| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Are there any plans to have DECmcc support the use of X.500
implementations in place of DNS for a distributed object repository?
Is anyone working with our X.500 product development group?
-Dan
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3247.1 | There are more players than x.500 in the game | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Thu Jun 25 1992 12:37 | 3 |
Discussions are taking place between MCC Engineering and the DCE group
in exactly this regard. Bear in mind that the situation is complex
given DME, DCE, DNS, CDS, XDS, X.500, BIND, etc, etc.
| |||||
| 3247.2 | contact TBG | TOOK::MATTHEWS | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:44 | 10 | |
Dan, the only support that I know of is that we added support
for DSA child entity into DNA5 Node just before SSB kitting.
Most of the OSI related development for DECmcc is being handled
by the TBG folks in Valbonne. I would suggest sending E-Mail
to FERIC::HARPER or TAEC::STUNAULT and asking them. We are
focusing more on general framework issues these days and leaving
OSI specifics to TBG.
wally
| |||||
| 3247.3 | Well, yes but... | TAEC::HARPER | John Harper, DTN 828 5351 | Mon Jun 29 1992 14:40 | 7 |
Wally's statement, that future OSI-related work, is being undertaken
here in Valbonne, is correct. However, the base question has little to
do with Management. I have forwarded it to the person who is best
qualified in the company to deal with it.
John
| |||||