| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 3230.1 | Testing Hardware
| RALLYE::MERRIFIELD | | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:58 | 12 |
| Andy,
The Stress testing for DECmcc V1.2 was done using a variety of systems
that we happen to have access to. These includ DECstation 5000/125's,
VAXserver 3800's, VAXstation 3100 M38s', and a VAXstation 4000-60.
Most of the systems had 32MEG of memory. Testing was done using
both DNS and Local MIR. Most tests were done both for VAX/VMS and MIPS/ULTRIX
systems. Some tests used the LOCAL MIR, while others used DECDNS MIR, depending
on how the test machine was setup.
Bob Merrifield
|
| 3230.2 | Which offered the best performance? | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Fri Jun 26 1992 17:58 | 12 |
| Bob,
Can you provide some info on which system configuration was best
and how closely each was in relation to the other (performance-wise)?
I'm also interested in how performance related to a DNS-based
repository as opposed to a local MIR. What was your DNS server
platform? How many objects in the namespace? What were DNS$SERVER
account resources configured (BYTLIM, ...)? What was RMS buffer set to
for each clearinghouse?
-Thanks,
Dan
|
| 3230.3 | DNS vrs Local MIR performance? | KAZAN::HOPE | dtn: 858-1452, Paris, France | Mon Aug 03 1992 11:28 | 15 |
|
re -1
I'm also interested in this info, so to put this note back in the unseen
list I'm repeating the request.
>>> I'm also interested in how performance related to a DNS-based
>>> repository as opposed to a local MIR. What was your DNS server
>>> platform? How many objects in the namespace? What were DNS$SERVER
>>> account resources configured (BYTLIM, ...)? What was RMS buffer set to
>>> for each clearinghouse?
thanks
steve
|
| 3230.4 | Local MIR vs DNS performance | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Tue Aug 04 1992 01:53 | 13 |
| I've forgotten which of the DECmcc engineers passed this info to me.
(my apologies).
500 nodes or less, Local MIR will perform better.
Greater than 500 nodes to manage, DNS will perform better.
My only comment is that I hope the X.500 product will perform better
than DNS. I've heard it is an order of magnitude faster than DNS.
That ain't much, but it's a start.
By the way, who is the X.500 representative for DECmcc?
-Dan
|