T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3137.1 | | SLINK::CHILDS | Strike a poseur. | Fri Jun 05 1992 11:08 | 14 |
| The RBMS protocol document is marked "Digital Company Confidential".
From your description it sounds like you are helping a customer build
their own network manangement software. Legally, I don't think we can
just hand over our specs. You might want to pursue this with your
manager though.
One thing you could do, would be to have the customer purchase a DECmcc
ELM kit and a DECmcc Developer's Toolkit. Using the Bridge AM's API
you could write your own network management application which would
call the Bridge AM to get forwarding database information.
If your customer has DECbridge 5xx/6xx series, these are
SNMP-manageable (as well as RBMS). You could use any SNMP manager to
get the information you need, so why not DECmcc's?
|
3137.2 | | SUBWAY::REILLY | Mike Reilly - New York Bank District | Fri Jun 05 1992 18:17 | 11 |
| Use DECmcc with the bridge AM and enter the following command
MCC> show bridge .bridge.nnn forwarding table physical entry *,
with outbound port = x, to file bridge_nnn_port_x.dat
This works just fine for me. It would be nice if you could take your
code for querying the 3-com bridges and plug it into the sample
access module, thus giving us all a 3-com bridge access module !!!!
- Mike
|
3137.3 | | SLINK::CHILDS | Strike a poseur. | Mon Jun 08 1992 11:48 | 5 |
| MCC> show bridge .bridge.nnn forwarding table physical entry *,
With DECmcc ELM V1.2, this will no longer work. Physical Entry has
been split into Dynamic Entry (for addresses the bridge learns) and
Static Entry (for addresses that are management created).
|
3137.4 | | SUBWAY::REILLY | Mike Reilly - New York Bank District | Mon Jun 08 1992 12:49 | 5 |
| Thanks Ed,
I was wondering why some of my trouble-shooting procedures had
broken since I upgraded to 1.2.
- Mike
|
3137.5 | Thanks | MSDOA::LOVE | Do it with DNA | Tue Jun 16 1992 09:25 | 11 |
| Thanks for your commits. A customer has MCC and claims it takes
about{7 minutes to get this information from 1 600 series bridge. This
is down from the original 30 minutes. This is why I have been asked if
my code might help.
Yes, I have considered making it a module under MCC. The system is
designed to run on a stand alone VAXstation with a control module which
can serve up to 10 clients via DECnet.
The problem with SNMP is getting the forwarding table one address at
a time.
Norm
|