Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I'm confused about the following, The protections on the DECmcc dictionary file should allow read/write access. -rw-rw-rw- 1 caille 999424 May 25 13:37 /usr/users/caille/mcc_dev/mcc_system/mcc_dev_fdictionary.dat However, when starting DECmcc Dictionary Administrator Program the dictionary is open for read-only access solix:mcc_dev> mcc_dap %DAP-S-USE_DICT_RDONLY, Using dictionary file: /usr/users/caille/mcc_dev/mcc_system/mcc_dev_fdictionary.dat, with read-only access DECmcc Dictionary Administrator Program Version T1.2.7 DAP> Could somebody tell me what is wrong ??? Jean-Mary.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3086.1 | Must be write-locked by another reader... | DFLAT::PLOUFFE | Jerry | Wed May 27 1992 18:03 | 24 |
Jean-Mary: The following paragraph was extracted from the DAP section of the latest version of the Toolkit Reference Manual. Hope this helps to explain your situation: DAP automatically tries to open the dictionary file with read-write access. The status message that is displayed when you run DAP tells you if the dictionary is opened with read-only access; otherwise the dictionary is opened with read-write access. If DAP can't open the file in read-write mode, it will try to open the file with read-only access. DAP will not be able to open a dictionary file at all if another DAP session has that dictionary file opened with read-write access. ==> DAP will open a dictionary file with read-only access if another ==> management module or DAP session currently has the file opened with ==> read-only access. - Jerry P.S. It may be advisable to peruse the latest version of the TK Reference Manual if you can. | |||||
3086.2 | DAP access right | NSDC::CAILLE | Mon Jun 01 1992 12:02 | 12 | |
Hello Jerry, thanks for your help... the two paragraphs your mentioned in your reply held me a lot to undersand my problem. Actually, I'm using the Toolkit Ref in the bookreader format, which does not include, as far as I known, any concern about concurrent DAP access. So that I'm going to copy the Postscript version of this document. Thanks again for your help, Jean-Mary. |