T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2919.1 | QAR 2873 | TOOK::BURGESS | | Sun May 03 1992 11:03 | 1 |
| QAR 2863 entered.
|
2919.2 | What do you mean? | RADBOX::ANDERSON | | Mon May 04 1992 13:24 | 7 |
| What is meant by .1? Is this problem a new QAR (2863), or is there an existing
QAR (2863) on this problem? If this is an existing QAR how can I get into the
QAR system to see if there is a resolution?
Thanks.
Bill Anderson
|
2919.3 | New QAR | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Mon May 04 1992 14:23 | 8 |
| It is a new QAR.
When one of the developers enters a note as a QAR, we leave in the
header, and the maintainers try to respond to the note when
the QAR is addressed (but sometimes we miss).
-- Erik
|
2919.4 | Any progress... | RADBOX::ANDERSON | | Fri May 08 1992 20:20 | 6 |
| Has there been any progress or resolution to this issue?
Could you please let me know how to access the QAR system so that I can check on
the status of this QAR?
Thanks.
|
2919.5 | Maybe a fix.... | RADBOX::ANDERSON | | Fri May 08 1992 20:41 | 5 |
| I have just talked to one of the support people at Wollongong, and they said
that we need to link the wollongong object library after the VAXRTL. They said
they have seen problems when the order is reversed.
I will give this a try and report back here if it works.
|
2919.6 | | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Sat May 09 1992 19:48 | 3 |
| You need to request a QAR system account if you want access to the
QAR system. See note 1.
|
2919.7 | Update please... | RADBOX::ANDERSON | | Mon May 11 1992 13:00 | 3 |
| Could someone give me an update on this QAR?
Thanks.
|
2919.8 | Nothing yet | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Mon May 11 1992 14:11 | 8 |
| The actual QAR on this subject is # 2873, filed at priority 2,
against the TCP/IP access module component. However, there are
other problems affecting that component as well.
There is no answer yet for QAR 2873.
-- Erik
|
2919.9 | Report back on .5 | RADBOX::ANDERSON | | Mon May 11 1992 18:52 | 3 |
| I just wanted to report back on the suggestion given to me by Wollongong in
the .5 entry. Changing the order of the link modules had no effect on the
Wollongong stuff.
|