T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2832.1 | Half and half | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Thu Apr 23 1992 09:31 | 8 |
| This kit just leaves alone any links that it finds.
For SSB, we plan to require that the CMA subset be installed on the
system. However, for FT update, we were unable to complete the
processes of packaging the CMA subset with our kit, so the old
scheme is still in place today.
-- Erik
|
2832.2 | question on 1/2 and 1/2 | MICROW::LANG | | Fri Apr 24 1992 09:53 | 12 |
| Erik,
If CMA had been installed with links, but not MCC, would
MCC overwrite the links? (This is what we were seeing in
earlier kits.)
If we delete the links to MCC directories and reinstall, should
the links be to MCC directories?
thanks,
Bonnie
|
2832.3 | Confusion will go away for SSB | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Fri Apr 24 1992 10:02 | 17 |
| > If CMA had been installed with links, but not MCC, would
> MCC overwrite the links? (This is what we were seeing in
> earlier kits.)
The DECmcc installation procedure should not over-write existing links.
> If we delete the links to MCC directories and reinstall, should
> the links be to MCC directories?
If you install DECmcc, and there are no links present, you will get
links to the CMA files in the DECmcc directories.
I don't know what will happen to any links when you remove DECmcc (setld -d).
All this will go away when we stop shipping CMA files in DECmcc
directories at all for SSB.
|