T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2815.1 | re .0 | ANOSWS::COMFORT | Spent a little time on the hill | Wed Apr 22 1992 11:36 | 16 |
|
I am curious to know how many domains you have and whether your
map interface has notification enabled. At one point with MCC,
I had over 150 domains and this caused the maps to take up to 15 minutes
to come up on a 3100 model 76/SPX. With notification disabled the
same map appears in less than a minute.
Additionally, my nameserver is also slow, but I see this when doing
things in line or forms modes such as dir domain *, or show node4
* all references, in domain xyzzy. Have you increased your RMS
buffer size on the DNS server? The default is 3, which I believe
caches only three buckets worth of the dns clearinghouse file.
Regards,
Dave Comfort
|
2815.2 | Info on Domains and DNS Buffer Size | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Wed Apr 22 1992 12:49 | 13 |
| Dave,
I have roughly 100 domains, but only 7 are DYNAMIC. Others are
STATIC. I have not had this problem before. I could get my map up in
a minute or so on a VAXstation 3100/76 32MB system. Now it takes 5
minutes or longer.
My DNS BUFFER SIZE is 127 (the maximum). I'm looking into a few
other issues as well based on suggestions from the DNS notes file
(note 657). I'll keep you posted, but any other suggestions are
welcome in the mean time.
-Dan
|
2815.3 | No answer, more info | ANOSWS::COMFORT | Spent a little time on the hill | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:36 | 8 |
|
Just another piece of info. Working the boyz at the CSC (Walt and
Steve), we believe that static domains still will have notification
enabled. We were looking into that when I had experienced memory
problems due to too many domains.
Dave
|
2815.4 | DNS resources increased; IMPM problem looking into domain | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Thu Apr 23 1992 02:41 | 28 |
| Dave,
Using $ SHOW PROC/CONT on the DNS$TA process on the DNS server node I
noticed that 37,000+ page faults.
I was able to increase DNS performance by increasing WSextent from 2000
to 16384, WSquo from 600 to 4096, BIOLM from 100 to 4096, PGLFQUO from
50000 to 75000. This was done for the DNS$SERVER account via the
AUTHORIZE utility. I then did an @SYS$STARTUP:DNS$STOP.COM followed by
an @SYS$STARTUP:DNS$STARTUP.COM to allow DNS$BACK and DNS$TA processes
to grab the new resources.
My DECmcc T1.2.7 IMPM startup improved; however,
------->>>> I am still unable to look into one of my domains.
The IMPM process had a 200,000+ Buffered I/O count after 20+ minutes
sitting at the LOOKING INTO window. I finally killed it. CPU time was
being consumed like crazy.
I did not have this problem with previous field test versions.
I can't see how 100+ domains could cause a problem, even with
notification enabled. This should not happen.
I also ran the new MCC_AUDIT.COM with NO CHANGES being recommended.
Any ideas?
-Dan
|
2815.5 | very slow ... | MFRNW1::SCHUSTER | Karl Schuster @MFR Network Services | Thu Apr 23 1992 03:59 | 5 |
| Yesterday I installed T1.2.7.
It took me 40 Minutes to get a Map on the screen. I saved the Map, the
next time it came up after 1 Minute - strange ?
Karl
|
2815.6 | re -.* | ANOSWS::COMFORT | Spent a little time on the hill | Thu Apr 23 1992 15:53 | 21 |
|
I have to apologize. Any statements I made referred to MCC V1.1.
My customer has not given the green light for V1.2 testing, even
though I understand we qualify as an external field test site.
Dan, just out of curiosity, have you tried disabling notification?
Also, what do your process resources look like... the account the
I run the map interface from looks like this:
Maxjobs: 0 Fillm: 100 Bytlm: 65536
Maxacctjobs: 0 Shrfillm: 0 Pbytlm: 0
Maxdetach: 0 BIOlm: 100 JTquota: 1024
Prclm: 20 DIOlm: 100 WSdef: 256
Prio: 4 ASTlm: 100 WSquo: 8192
Queprio: 0 TQElm: 128 WSextent: 20000
CPU: (none) Enqlm: 2000 Pgflquo: 80000
Dave
|
2815.7 | Workaround to IMPM Looking into Domain performance problem | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Fri Apr 24 1992 02:01 | 28 |
| Looks like Karl found the answer. I double-clicked on the domain icon
to "look into" it and just let it run for -->> 46 minutes <<--- before
it finally succeeded. I saved the map as Karl suggested, then got out
of the IMPM and invoked DECmcc again to check it out.
It worked. I got into my domain in less than a minute.
???? What happened??
To answer your question, Dave, I did not disable notification. There
were no alarm rules defined since I had not completed the installation
verification of T1.2.7. I'm assuming by your comments that
notification being enabled will cause a problem performance-wise,
especially if I have several domains. If so, why didn't I have this
problem before?
As far as my account resources are concerned, my account parameters are
much higher than yours (e.g., BYTLM=2000000, PGFLQUO=150000,
BIOLM=4096, WSEXTENT=30000, DIOLM=4096, ...). I'm running a VAXstation
3100/76 with 32MB memory. It is a cluster member (LAVc), but most
files are on local disks.
Turns out that the DNS problem and this DECmcc problem were not
related.
I'd still like to know why I had the look-into-domain problem.
Thanks,
Dan
|
2815.8 | disabling notification doesn't matter for t1.2.7 | DADA::DITMARS | Pete | Tue Apr 28 1992 09:42 | 9 |
| There's been a change in V1.2 where the domain hierarchy is always walked
when opening a domain, even if the map window's notification setting is
"disabled". This is because the user can request notification via an
alternative method, and without the domain hierarchy information the
notifications wouldn't bubble up through the domains.
We're currently doing work to push the domain hiearchy traversal into a
background thread, so the map window will come up in a reasonable amount of
time for large domain hierarchies.
|
2815.9 | is the open "fast" forever after the initial open? | DADA::DITMARS | Pete | Tue Apr 28 1992 09:47 | 11 |
| > it finally succeeded. I saved the map as Karl suggested, then got out
> of the IMPM and invoked DECmcc again to check it out.
>
> It worked. I got into my domain in less than a minute.
This might point to a performance problem with the IMPM autoplacing members in a
domain?
If it varies open-to-open, with things slowing down significantly when a
large amount of time elapses between opens, then perhaps DNS caching (only
available with Phase V implementations) is the reason.
|
2815.10 | Autoplacment seems to be the key | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Thu Apr 30 1992 01:46 | 23 |
| RE:.9
Pete,
The worst offender was a domain which contained roughly 40 entities
that had been autoplaced. There were also about 15 STATIC domains in
this domain along with the autoplaced entities.
Once the map was saved, everything was fine.
I didn't like what happened, though. I wish you could come up with a
better (read this "faster") way to get the job done.
During the process of gaining information, I once spent 63 minutes
looking into a domain! The DNS$TA process on one of our nameserver
nodes (DNS V1.1 on VMS V5.5) was consuming 35% CPU time and clicking
off 30 Buffered i/o's per second. There were over 300 Converted locks
per second.
My network management workstation (VAXstation 3100/76 32MB) was
hammered by the IMPM process (40% avg CPU, 126 Buff I/O per sec).
-Dan
|
2815.11 | Found problem | BARREL::LEMMON | | Thu Apr 30 1992 13:56 | 10 |
| I reviewed the algoritm with William Kwak this morning and see
the problem (actualy he found it and told me to fix it :-).
The alternate id support with respect to entities in the domain
but not in the map file needs to be optimized. This will
be addressed for v1.2.
/Jim
|
2815.12 | Good job | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Fri May 01 1992 02:09 | 7 |
| Nice job, gentlemen. Anything else you can do to speed up DNS access
would be most appreciated.
MCC is looking much better with each iteration.
Thanks,
Dan
|
2815.13 | summation | TOOK::CALLANDER | MCC = My Constant Companion | Wed Jun 17 1992 15:35 | 15 |
| A number of items have been mentioned in this note. It is time to
sum things up. *ALL* of the definiciencies that you have noted and
some one from mcc has acknowledged (thanks Jim, Pete) have been
addressed and their fixes are now in the kit getting ready for
SSB. Our internal test we are now using have a domain hierarchy that
includes over 800 domains within it. With the latest kit it
takes less than 1 minute (50-55 seconds to be exact) for the map
to become operational. Please noe though that notification still
takes a while before it becomes active. The way that now works is
that the events as soon as they are available will show up in the
notification window, but color changes will still have to wait
until the map notification structures are setup, and in a large hierarchy that
can be a substantial period of time (5-45 minutes depending upon
how huge the structures are), unless you are dealing with a smaller
domain.
|