| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Ultrix Phase V NCL will accept the NSAP or the NET as an input entity. I was wondering if there are plans for any MCC Phase V modules to do the same ?
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2700.1 | which entities are you interested in | TOOK::MATTHEWS | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:23 | 9 | |
You need to be more specific about which child entities of node that
you are referring to. Although in general we like to stay as close
to the NCL products as is feasible, we make no guarantees to track
them exactly. If you supply me with a list of specific child entities
and a description of the possible alternate identifiers that Ultrix
NCL accepts, I will see what we have done for V1.2.
wally matthews
| |||||
| 2700.2 | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Tue Apr 07 1992 08:21 | 13 | |
Wally, I would guess that the author of .0 wants to use the NSAP as the identifier for the Node global class. As mentioned in .0, ULTRIX NCL allows a variety of forms for the node identifier: fullname (and any abbreviations or defaulting handled by DNS), synonym (Phase IV name), towerset, Phase IV address (nn.mmmm), NSAP are the ones I know work (NET and VMS style Phase IV address (nnnnn) may also be supported, I am not sure). Note that the "NSAP" form doesn't use backtranslation: it effectively constructs a towerset containing the NSAP (with the other floors hardcoded). Graham | |||||
| 2700.3 | nice feature for the future | TOOK::MATTHEWS | Tue Apr 07 1992 16:08 | 19 | |
Based upon Graham's information, It is unlikely that for V1.2 DECmcc
will support the wide range of node identification that Ultrix NCL
supports. This was brought to our attention only recently and there
isn't adequate time to resolve it, since our code has been essentially
frozen for a few weeks. I will bring this to the UI teams attention
for the next development cycle.
One of the reasons DECmcc has not been as attentive to this issue as
NCL is that DECmcc is a wide spectrum management system which spans
more than a single technology. NCL to do this, uses a lot of DNA5
specific knowledge in its User Interface to fill in the blanks so
to speak. This is divergent from the goal of DECmcc for its User
Interface to generic and not have technology specific code built into
it. This is another case in point where a point product can be more
user friendly than a general product. To improve DECmcc we need to
find some way for the various AMs to influence the user interface
in doing just this sort of thing.
wally
| |||||
| 2700.4 | expansion on .0 | PARZVL::SHIAU | Tue Apr 07 1992 16:23 | 101 | |
Hi,
Thank you for the quick reply. My name is Jerry, I work with the author of
.0. Our question is about using NSAP or NET as Identifier to make the AM call as
Graham has mentioned.
The problem we are having is when we are trying to access a Phase V node, of
which the only information available to us at the point is NSAP. Right now, we
are writing the code to translation the NSAP to backtranslation and retrieve the
fullname and then issue the AM calls. Since there is no garantee the existence
of the backtranslation of each NSAP or any of the NSAP, the chance of exception
is pretty big. When I tested it with WAVE1, the NCL didn't accept NSAP. However,
lately I tested on a Ultrix Phase V node, it did as the attatchment (well, it
worked with 3 out of 4 NSAP at least, even thought I know there is no
backtranslation for the NET: 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0D-A4-87.
So our question is whether MCC will be able to accept NET or NSAP as the NCL
command showing below:
ncl> sh node 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0D-A4-87
Node 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0D-A4-87
AT 1992-04-07-15:56:48.140-04:00I0.153
Identifiers
Name = DEC:.lkg.shlump
Address =
{
(
[ DNA_CMIP-MICE ] ,
[ DNA_SessionControlV3 , number=19 ] ,
[ DNA_OSItransportV1 , 'DEC0'H ] ,
[ DNA_OSInetwork , 49::00-04:AA-00-04-00-35-11:21 (cte_ns:.lkg.shlump)
]
) ,
(
[ DNA_CMIP-MICE ] ,
[ DNA_SessionControlV3 , number=19 ] ,
[ DNA_NSP ] ,
[ DNA_OSInetwork , 49::00-04:AA-00-04-00-35-11:20 (cte_ns:.lkg.shlump)
]
) ,
(
[ DNA_CMIP-MICE ] ,
[ DNA_SessionControlV3 , number=19 ] ,
[ DNA_OSItransportV1 , 'DEC0'H ] ,
[ DNA_OSInetwork , 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0D-A4-87:21 ]
) ,
(
[ DNA_CMIP-MICE ] ,
[ DNA_SessionControlV3 , number=19 ] ,
[ DNA_NSP ] ,
[ DNA_OSInetwork , 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0D-A4-87:20 ]
)
}
and for other DNA5 routing AMs:
ncl> show node 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0F-31-8D:20 routing all char
Node 41:45418715:00-41:08-00-2B-0F-31-8D:20 Routing
AT 1992-04-07-11:19:03.290-04:00Iinf
Characteristics
Version = T1.0.6
Type = L2Router
Maximum Path Splits = 1
Maximum Buffers = 100
Redirect Holding Time = 600
Generate Checksums = False
Lifetime = 63
Manual L1 Algorithm = Link State
Manual L2 Algorithm = Routing Vector
Manual Area Addresses =
{
41:45418715:00-41
}
Segment Buffer Size = 576
PhaseIV Buffer Size = 0
PhaseIV Address = 12.5
PhaseIV Prefix = 49::
PhaseIV Maximum Address = 1023
PhaseIV Maximum Hops = 30
PhaseIV Maximum Cost = 1022
PhaseIV Maximum Area = 63
PhaseIV Broadcast Routing Timer = 10
PhaseIV Area Maximum Hops = 30
PhaseIV Area Maximum Cost = 1022
PhaseIV Maximum Visits = 63
Protocols =
{
ISO8473
}
Thanks for the help,
Jerry Shiau
| |||||
| 2700.5 | Thanks, Wally, that is what I need to know. | PARZVL::SHIAU | Tue Apr 07 1992 16:27 | 0 | |