T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2577.1 | I don't get it. | TOOK::MCPHERSON | Save a tree: kill an ISO working group. | Mon Mar 16 1992 20:27 | 14 |
| > After all the time and effort taken to find patches for V1.1.
Huh? What about note 1267.* ? Is there something I'm missing here? A "SHOW
CONFERENCE" in here will point you to the exact note...
> I would be gratefully if there was ONE notes entry for all
> the patches for each BaseLevel.
We don't issue patches for FT software. That's the point of having FT
baselevels... You issue Patches for products that have already SHIPPED and have
bugs that can't wait until the next relase to be fixed.
/doug
|
2577.2 | see conference notice | TOOK::CALLANDER | MCC = My Constant Companion | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:40 | 3 |
| the note is also pointed to by the conference notice
(show conference)
|
2577.3 | TwO entry for AMs (patches and kits) | SEDSWS::MALLOY | | Thu Apr 23 1992 15:43 | 21 |
| The patches and Kit note entries are becoming a mess.
Each AM should have a kit note entry and patch notes entry
eg
SNMP ------> snmp Am patches
SNMP -----> snmp (TCPIP_Am) kit location
TSAM -----> TSAM patches
TSAM------> TSAM kit location
The number of AMs is growing and therefore 3.**** and 1267.****.
I have the time or energy to go hunting for patches or kit locations.
I have customer problems to fix
Each BMS version should have a patch note entry
eg
BMS V1.1 -------> BMS V1.1 patches
BMS V1.2--------> BMS V1.2 patches
One entry for all BMS kits
|