T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2576.1 | | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Toolkit Team | Tue Mar 17 1992 08:02 | 21 |
| RE: .0
Gary,
Could you enable Notification Services so you will get a list when each
Alarms Rule Fires?
You can do this from the Iconic Map (under the applications pull-down)
run the FCL interface in another window (on the same system) and use the
notify directive:
notify domain <domain-name>
Where <domain-name> is the where your circuit and alarms rules are stored.
---------
Each Alarms Rule Fired (or exception) event which Alarms detects will be
listed by Notification Services.
/keith
|
2576.2 | set notification "Recieved error message" | SEDSWS::MALLOY | | Thu Mar 19 1992 13:04 | 38 |
| Keith
I enable notification as requested.
Switch line SVA-0 off/on
The node iconic changed colour as per Node4 circuit SVA-0 alarm
rule.
These alarm events were display on the notification window.
Again
The circuit rule failed to fire. (No notification)
Next
====
I then changed the state of the circuit administrative state to unlocked
to locked. The circuit SVA-0 when down
The alarm rule of adminstrativechange fired as counter
evaluation true increased to 1.
There was no notification just two error messages
ONE message on a error message window
"notify request 1 from domain Gary encounter an error
%MCC-E-ILVINE , specified not found within current constructor"
One error message on decterm which activated the Iconic Map
"MCC_NS_OCC_CREATE
Unexpected error 52875178 decoding response from request 1"
Gary Malloy
dtn 7844 3308
|
2576.3 | This may be the problem with Alarms and Event Id codes | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Toolkit Team | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:54 | 8 |
| This may be the same seen elsewhere in this conference.
Alarms has a problem with the occurs function, in the way it
passes the event id code to the target MM (in this case the Circuit AM).
Try using 'any event' inplace of the event name.
/keith
|
2576.4 | Crircuit Am is total mess when it comes to alarming
| SEDSWS::MALLOY | | Fri Mar 20 1992 13:21 | 24 |
| Keith
I appreciate what you are saying but there were four alarm rule
setup for this CIRCUIT.
But only one fired and it caused an exception.
Event Names
aendpointcheange
componentcheanged
NMFadminstrativestatechanged----->fired--->exception
NMFoperationalstatecheange
I will try the other events for CIRCUIT AM
Gary Malloy
(DTN 7744 3308)
|
2576.5 | | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Toolkit Team | Fri Mar 20 1992 13:28 | 11 |
| > I appreciate what you are saying but there were four alarm rule
> setup for this CIRCUIT.
Because the Event code that Alarms passes to the Circuit AM is not
being processed correctly (by Alarms), anything is possible.
Garbage In ==> Garbage Out
This problem is on the list of things to fix for 1.2
/keith
|