| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2562.1 | QAR 2486 | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Fri Mar 13 1992 13:07 | 4 |
| No, this is not correct behavior. You should be able to do what
you are trying to do.
QAR # 2486 in mcc_internal.
|
| 2562.2 | exit | TOOK::KROSE | | Fri Mar 13 1992 13:50 | 13 |
| The "in domain qualifier", is not supported in this way.
However, you can accomplish the desired results in the
following manner :
MCC> create circuit dummy
MCC> create domain gary member dummy
When you invoke the iconic map and open domain gary, you should find
all of your circuit icons.
...Karyn
|
| 2562.3 | I check the DOCumentation
| SEDSWS::MALLOY | | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:39 | 12 |
| Thanks
I have check the documentation and Karyn is right.
But the form interface should complained that the
"in domain" qualifier is incorrect.
Thanks again for your quick response
Gary
|
| 2562.4 | good suggestion | TOOK::CALLANDER | MCC = My Constant Companion | Mon Mar 23 1992 08:54 | 17 |
| Actually the PM has no knowledge as to which entities/commands
do and do not support any of the qualifiers. We always pass the
qualifiers down and allow the MM to do the validation. In this
case the MM decided to ignore the in domain and
allow the command to complete successfully.
There have been discussions in the past of extending the MCC
registration process to allow xMs to inform the PMs as to what
qualifiers are supported. If this change makes it into the V2.0
kit then the PMs will be able to do just what you are asking.
Thanks for the suggestion and keep up the input, it helps us in
prioritizing what needs to be done and what is viewed by the users as
problems in the system.
jill
|