[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
2543.0. "Strange compilation of DEPENDS ON clause in MSL." by KETJE::PACCO () Wed Mar 11 1992 11:30
Is there anything wrong the the following MSL? The translation always
gives the following error:
$ manage/tool/spec/lan=(mac,c) MCC_OLSC_AM_SRVC.MS
DECmcc Management Specification Language Translation Tool
Version X1.2.15
%MCCMSL-I-MSLLOCATION, Line: 884, File: MCC_OLSC_AM_SRVC.MS,
%MCCMSL-E-PARSER, syntax error: The value "3" is not expected
The "DEPENDS ON" clause is the cause of the error, because once removed
the MSL is compiled correctly. I reduced the MSL to a minimum. Can
somebody comment on this ?
Dominique.
TYPE
Xclass = 10007 (
0 = 0,
1 = 1,
2 = 2,
3 = 3,
4 = 4,
5 = 5,
6 = 6 );
...
CHILD ENTITY MODULE = 2 :
PARENT = ( OLSC ),
IDENTIFIER = ( ),
DYNAMIC = TRUE,
SYMBOL = CLASS_OLSC_MODULE,
...
CHARACTERISTIC ATTRIBUTES
ATTRIBUTE Class = 3101 : Xclass
ACCESS = NONSETTABLE,
DISPLAY = TRUE,
SYMBOL = Class,
CATEGORIES = ( CONFIGURATION)
END ATTRIBUTE Class;
ATTRIBUTE Last Source Address = 3111 : ID802
DEPENDS ON = "Class IN SET 2,3,4,5",
ACCESS = NONSETTABLE,
DISPLAY = TRUE,
SYMBOL = LastSourceAddress,
CATEGORIES = ( CONFIGURATION)
END ATTRIBUTE Last Source Address;
...
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2543.1 | Parenthesis around values? | CHRISB::BRIENEN | DECmcc LAN and SNMP Stuff... | Wed Mar 11 1992 15:52 | 3 |
| Maybe this will work?
DEPENDS ON = "Class IN SET (2,3,4,5)",
|
| 2543.2 | Compilation successfull now. | KETJE::PACCO | | Thu Mar 12 1992 13:22 | 6 |
| Chris,
Now ot works syntactically, I am confident that it also will work
functionally.
Dominique.
|
| 2543.3 | It may work now, but will it always? | TOOK::STRUTT | Management - the one word oxymoron | Wed Mar 18 1992 19:35 | 4 |
| You are defining an attribute whose name is CLASS.
Isn't "class" a reserved keyword?
Colin
|
| 2543.4 | CLASS usefull as attribute name. | KETJE::PACCO | | Fri Mar 20 1992 11:15 | 8 |
| It would be very ennoying if "Class" cannot be used as attribute,
because the HW accessed has already documented attributes, one of these
being "Class". Taking another name for that same attribute could lead
to misunderstanding and confusion.
I have still not hard facts to tell it works or not.
Dominique.
|