| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi folks, We have been doing some testing in DEC: and may have found an anomoly with the access needed to place an object on a map. If the 'NODE' object has been registered via another MCC I can issue FCL commands against the 'node' successfully having only READ and TEST access. However, if I try to place this 'node' on a map with found it required READ, TEST, and WRITE access on the object using IMPM. This inconsistency doesn't appear appropriate and does cause a security issue for MCC to use the namespace. Can anyone comment on whether this should be the proper access needed and if there are any plans to change this before FCS? thanks for any info, brad...
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2502.1 | Adding entity to MAP modifies DNA object attributes | TRM::KWAK | Thu Mar 05 1992 15:52 | 16 | |
RE: .0
Placing an entity on a map means that you are modifying/creating
the attributes of bothe the entity and the domain.
Suppose you add .lkg.foo to a domain .a.mydomain, you are modifying or
creating "MCC_DOMAIN_LIST" attribute of ".lkg.foo" and
"DNS$Members" attribuite of ".a.mydomain".
Under FCL, if you issue command
MCC> create domain .a.mydomain mem .lkg.foo
you need READ, WRITE ands TEST access on both node and domain objects.
| |||||
| 2502.2 | thanks | ICS::WOODCOCK | Thu Mar 05 1992 16:24 | 3 | |
thanks for the speedy reply...
| |||||