T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2483.1 | New SRM not yet available | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Wed Mar 04 1992 13:40 | 9 |
| There are a number of changes that will be documented in the V1.2
SRM, which is not yet available.
However, I'm not sure that these particular routines were intended
for general use, and their inclusion in the manual may have been
an oversight.
-- Erik
|
2483.2 | These routines are useful for portable MM's | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Toolkit Team | Wed Mar 04 1992 14:32 | 7 |
| Yes .. the MMP manual certainly says to use these routines. By using
them you can write your MM once for both VMS and Ultrix, as the Kernel
will do the right thing for you (Operating System dependent).
I believe these routines must be documented for v1.2 ...
/keith
|
2483.3 | Not planned for SRM | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:35 | 7 |
| The current plan does not include documenting these routines for
the V1.2 SRM, (which means they should be removed from the toolkit
documentation). DECthreads (CMA) already provides wrapper routines
for these functions, and DECmcc does not plan to provide another
layer for what are basic system routines (rather than management
specific routines).
|
2483.4 | | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Toolkit Team | Thu Mar 05 1992 13:35 | 18 |
| > The current plan does not include documenting these routines for
> the V1.2 SRM, (which means they should be removed from the toolkit
> documentation). DECthreads (CMA) already provides wrapper routines
> for these functions, and DECmcc does not plan to provide another
> layer for what are basic system routines (rather than management
> specific routines).
Erik,
If there are common DECthread routines (which work for both VMS and ULTRIX)
then by all means these are the routines which we should recommend MM
developers to use...and the Toolkit documentation will be updated to reflect
this.
But - what are these routines? and are the identical in form & function for
both Operating Systems?
/keith
|
2483.5 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Thu Mar 05 1992 16:24 | 6 |
| No they are not identical but it is not MCC's job to maintain a
library of portable OS interface routines. This would be an
unbelievable time sink. The less we make MCC into an operating system
the more time we can spend on enterprise management better.
|