Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hello, I'm working on both DECmcc/VMS V1.1. I want to follow throught DECnet IV AM the behavior of specific DECnet objects which are associated to a VMS process with a Process Id attribute (like PATHwork processes, for example...). If I use the FCL show command, I can obtain the Process ID attibutes. BUT, If I try to create an rule, ALARMS FM doesn't want to support the type Process Id (ie OCTET STRING) in the rule expression. Please see the following Captured FCL session... * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * %MCC-I-SAVEHEADER, DECmcc output region Wed Feb 26 17:15:40 1992 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * show node4 stras5 obj * Process Id, with process id <> %X00000000 Node4 47.465 Object $IPCACP AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:26 Characteristics Process ID = %X2020010E Node4 47.465 Object SMISERVER AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:27 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200110 Node4 47.465 Object REMACP AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:28 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200113 Node4 47.465 Object EVL AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:28 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200112 Node4 47.465 Object CTERM AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:29 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200113 Node4 47.465 Object DNS$TA AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:30 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200133 Node4 47.465 Object DNS$BACK AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:30 Characteristics Process ID = %X20200134 create mcc 0 alarm rule rule_test expression = (CHANGE_OF(node4 stras5 object DNS$TA process ID, *,*)) MCC 0 ALARMS RULE rule_test AT 26-FEB-1992 17:15:34 Data type of the attribute in the alarm expression is currently unsupported. capture * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * %MCC-I-SAVETRAILER, end of DECmcc output region * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I checked on a DECmcc/ULTRIX V1.1 (EFT) if the problem also occurs and I obtained the same message. 1) Is it a normal case ? Is it a bug ? 2) I wanted to change the DECmcc dictionary and rebuild th Parse Tables with a Process Id declared as a LATIN STRING. But I couldn't manage to do any change without overwritting the NODE4 class and subclasses hierarchy. How can I do that operation ? The aim is to be able to write an alarm rule with a DATATYPE recognized by the ALARM FM. Thank you for your help !! Renato
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2429.1 | Pb also occurs on DECmcc/ULTRIX EFT V1.2 | ZTOIS1::VISTA | Renato VISTA, SIS Strasbourg, France | Mon Mar 02 1992 08:48 | 10 |
Hello, Just a comment : of course, I tested the situation on a EFT DECmcc/ULTRIX V1.2 (not V1.1 !!...). Thank you for your help ! Renato | |||||
2429.2 | Assigned QAR number 02462 | TOOK::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Tue Mar 10 1992 10:51 | 3 |
Assigned QAR number 02462 s/rob | |||||
2429.3 | Info about QAR : delay, version, patchs ? | ZTOIS1::VISTA | Renato VISTA, SIS Strasbourg, France | Wed Apr 08 1992 06:21 | 13 |
Hello Rob, Thank you for your reply ! Is it possible to have information about the QAR and about the status of the problem (delay? , new version ?, patchs ?) Regards, Renato PS : a recent note has been opened (note 2695.*) and I've also replied. | |||||
2429.4 | TOOK::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Wed Apr 15 1992 11:53 | 13 | |
We are discussing problems in unreleased code so I wouldn't expect patches or versions to fix things. The issue will be if the added function of this datatype support will be added to the currently under development release or deferred untill a later release. The QAR is a mechanisim to be sure we don't forget to address it. I believe that a reply to note 2695 has already addressed what is likely to be done in the short term. s/rob |