T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2358.1 | a few pointers... | BSYBEE::EGOLF | John C. Egolf LKG2-2/T02 x226-7874 | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:18 | 10 |
| Contact Steve Lane for the current SPD and related docs.
Directory BSYBEE::DUA0:[PUBLIC]
V12_BMS_SPD_DRAFT.TXT
V12_DIR_PROD_FAMILY_DRAFT.TXT
V12_DIR_SPD_DRAFT.TXT
V12_SALES_UPDATE_DRAFT.TXT
NETU292.PS (Contains min hardware for VMS and ULTRIX)
|
2358.2 | Be careful of quoting bare minimum systems | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development, dtn 226-5033 | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:40 | 7 |
| But please be aware that the minimum requirements are for minimum
functionality. As you increase the load on the system (more alarm rules,
more historical recording, etc) you will want more disk space, and
especially more memory, in order to maintain performance.
-- Erik
|
2358.3 | Min config = Late nights | SIOG::TINNELLY | Next village America.. | Wed Feb 19 1992 05:00 | 12 |
|
Many thanks for the pointers. I agree on the point re min config., from
experience I would never propose a bare minimum configuration. You
generally end up with an unhappy customer and lots of headaches.
It would be useful if some table existed to help field specialists
configure DECmcc.eg small network 10 nodes requires the following
hardware, medium sized network requires... If the configurations of the
Field tests sites were entered and sizes of networks being managed was
inputted here, and how they performed, would be very usefeul info.
regards Peter
|