[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:	DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:	Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:	TAEC::BEROUD

Created:	Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:	Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	6497
Total number of notes:	27359

2320.0. "Registration & Autotopology - How can I start over??" by MUTTON::LAMB (Peter Lamb - GSG Santa Clara) Tue Feb 11 1992 20:17

Hello,

I made the mistake of running DECnet & TCP autotopologies before I had either
an NCP database defined or a complete TCP/IP hosts file.  I realize I could
go through and deregister each of the nodes in the database but I'm wondering
if by any chance there is a faster way??

Thanks!

peter

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
2320.1	Wildcard worked!!	MUTTON::LAMB	Peter Lamb - GSG Santa Clara	`Tue Feb 11 1992 20:26`	8
	Amazing, I figured it out... Using the command line DEREGISTER NODE4 * did the trick Note DEREGISTER SNMP * seemed to have problems deregistering the first node it got to but hey 1 out of two isn't bad! Peter
2320.2	Q- could you please supply more info, potential problem	TOOK::CALLANDER	MCC = My Constant Companion	`Wed Feb 26 1992 08:12`	7
	what kind of "problem" did you have with the deregister snmp *. You really shouldn't have had a problem. If you have a log of it that would be real helpful. Also do you know if the snmp entities were only partially registered at the time of the attempted deregister?
2320.3		PJWL::LAMB	Peter Lamb - GSG Santa Clara MAIL=MUTTON::LAMB	`Wed Feb 26 1992 23:17`	6
	Yes, They were probably only partially registered... Why would this make a difference? Peter
2320.4	partial registration is a diff code path.	TOOK::CALLANDER	MCC = My Constant Companion	`Tue Mar 31 1992 18:30`	5
	Peter, it shouldn't matter, but it does go through a different logic flow that is why I was interested. Have you found the problem yet, or found a work around?