T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2105.1 | QAR 2124 | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development | Tue Jan 14 1992 16:17 | 2 |
| Entered as QAR 2124 at priority 1
|
2105.2 | DO you run with full privs? | TOOK::NAVKAL | | Wed Jan 15 1992 15:04 | 33 |
| Hi Merlin,
Well the good news is that I can reproduce the crash! The bad news is
I am not quite sure what causes it. Let me give you my findings first.
Okay the crash I observed happens under following situation. Please
verify that your situation is identical.
1. IP is invoked from Iconic map.
2. The account had all the privileges enabled.
3. option -p and -h were specified in the cf file.
5. The option host-permit was specified too.
Under the above condition UCX software causes the VMS operating system
to crash. Merlin, since you have the dump file, is it possible for
you to run SDA and let me know the image that caused the crash?
I also found that IP runs to its completion when the process has the
following privileges.
NETMBX, TMPMBX, OPER
The above privileges are all that the software needs. I am still puzzled as
to why a software should run fine with less privs and run wild if the privs
are turned on! But then again I know what happens when you leave the kids home
alone!!
I will post here my findings as I know better about the problem.
- Anil
|
2105.3 | Basic Privs - No Crash | MAIL::CLAYTON | Merlin Clayton DTN 445-7217 | Thu Jan 16 1992 14:42 | 18 |
| Anil,
I was running MCC with full privs originally. I turned off all but the
necessary privs for UCX (OPER, BYPASS, SYSPRV) and it did NOT crash! Is
this an undocumented feature?
However, after running the config and registration process from the IMPM,
the procedure still did not populate the targeted domain eventhough it
completed with success and said it found 20 nodes in two networks. Is
there another step I need to run to populate the domain?
I'm also working without documentation. Last time I looked, I didn't see any
documentation for the Autoconfig function on WORDY. Is this documentation
available elsewhere?
Merlin
|
2105.4 | Documentation is in the release notes | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, DECmcc Development | Thu Jan 16 1992 15:07 | 13 |
| Crashes are not a feature, regardless of your privs... :-)
>I'm also working without documentation. Last time I looked, I didn't see any
>documentation for the Autoconfig function on WORDY. Is this documentation
>available elsewhere?
There is some draft documentation at the end of the release notes.
The final documentation is still being written, so it is not
available on WORDY.
-- Erik
|
2105.5 | Did you specify the full name of the domain? | TOOK::FIGWER | Ulla Figwer LKG2-2/T2 x226-7858 | Thu Jan 16 1992 15:41 | 37 |
|
Hello Merlin,
> However, after running the config and registration process from the IMPM,
> the procedure still did not populate the targeted domain eventhough it
> completed with success and said it found 20 nodes in two networks. Is
> there another step I need to run to populate the domain?
A few thoughts...
It is not necessary for you to create a domain before invoking the
Autoconfiguration application. Autoconfiguration will create domain(s)
for you, starting with the top level domain you specify when you run
the utility.
The Autoconfiguration chapter of the release notes discusses namespace
planning and mentions a prefix file, MCC_AUTOCONFIG_PREFIX.DAT.
Autoconfiguration uses the prefixes specified in this file to generate
fullnames for all entities to be registered. This includes domains.
The default prefix for the DOMAIN entity class is .MCC.DOMAIN.
Thus, if you have not modified MCC_AUTOCONFIG_PREFIX.DAT, the full
specification of the domain created by Autoconfiguration would be
".MCC.DOMAIN.STO_TCPIP".
Try opening ".MCC.DOMAIN.STO_TCPIP" and see what happens. If this domain is
not populated, it is possible that Autoconfiguration ran into problems
registering entities in the domain.
If this is the case, the file TRACE_REGISTRATION.LOG in the directory
[<top dir>.IP.STO_TCPIP] would offer hints as to what went wrong.
Let us know what you find!
Regards,
Ulla Figwer
|
2105.6 | Did you chech the DNS for dirs in prefix file? | TOOK::NAVKAL | | Sun Jan 19 1992 18:18 | 36 |
| Re: .3
I am running IP autoconfig with the following three privileges.
TMPMBX, NETMBX, and OPER. I don't need any additional privileges.
I am still trying to see what the problem is with full privileges.
I do not plan on considering this as a "feature". Crashing
VMS is no small offense.
Re your problem about notes not getting registered, have
you checked if the DNS has the directories indicated in the
prefix file (MCC_AUTOCONFIG_PREFIX.DAT)? The command to be
used for checking the presence of the default dirs indicated in
the prefix files is as follows:
$ mcr dns$control
DNS> SHOW DIR . known child
:
The output should indicate MCC as one of the children.
DNS> SHOW DIR .MCC know child
This command should indicate (at least) two children.
.ip
.DOMAIN
If you have the above dirs defined, and you are still experiencing a
problem, let us know.
Regards,
- Anil
|
2105.7 | UCX Required SYSPRV and BYPASS | MAIL::CLAYTON | Merlin Clayton DTN 445-7217 | Mon Jan 20 1992 10:42 | 23 |
|
Re: .6
> I am running IP autoconfig with the following three privileges.
> TMPMBX, NETMBX, and OPER. I don't need any additional privileges.
UCX would not run unless I added SYSPRV and BYPASS to my process
privs.
> Re your problem about notes not getting registered, have
> you checked if the DNS has the directories indicated in the
> prefix file (MCC_AUTOCONFIG_PREFIX.DAT)? The command to be
> used for checking the presence of the default dirs indicated in
> the prefix files is as follows:
Remember, I'm running with a local namespace, not DNS, so the above
is N/A.
Regards,
- Anil
|
2105.8 | Progress so far is very slow.. | TOOK::NAVKAL | | Mon Jan 20 1992 14:32 | 63 |
| >> UCX would not run unless I added SYSPRV and BYPASS to my process
privs.
I don't understand why your UCX should require the extra privs.
Can you get hold of UCX installation guide and verify the privs needed?
As I said I have no problem running UCX with bare minimum pirvs.
Infact if you don't specify ping option you don't even need
the OPER privledges.
>> Remember, I'm running with a local namespace, not DNS, so the above
is N/A.
Sorry I missed that. Can you register any thing at all?
I am still working on the original VMS crash problem. The progress thus
far is as follows:
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
|Topology| O/S Version |Privs |Invoked |Options | Result|
| | |enabled |from | | |
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
|IP | VMS 5.4-3 | NETMBX |DCL |-h -p | Worked|
| | | TMPMBX | |host-permit nn.nn.0.0 | just |
| | | OPER | |mask 255.255.0.0 | fine! |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |host nn.nn.0.0 | |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 | |
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
|IP | VMS 5.4-3 | NETMBX |Iconic |-h -p | Worked|
| | | TMPMBX |map |host-permit nn.nn.0.0 | just |
| | | OPER | |mask 255.255.0.0 | fine! |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |host nn.nn.0.0 | |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 | |
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
|IP | VMS 5.4-3 | ALL |DCL |-h -p | Worked|
| | | | |host-permit nn.nn.0.0 | just |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 | fine! |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |host nn.nn.0.0 | |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 | |
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
|IP | VMS 5.4-3 | ALL | Iconic |-h -p | VMS |
| | | | Map |host-permit nn.nn.0.0 | |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 |Crashed!|
| | | | | | |
| | | | |host nn.nn.0.0 | � |
| | | | |mask 255.255.0.0 | � |
+--------+--------------+--------+--------+------------------------+--------+
� The crash dump was not enabled so I lost the data! :(
� Another m/c on which we managed to crash VMS is being shipped to
COMNET show and is off line right now. :( :(
So the bottom line is I am now enabling a crash dump on my boot node
run the utility, and hope for the crash! If I get the crash I will report
my findings here.
- Anil
|
2105.9 | UCX Privs | MAIL::CLAYTON | Merlin Clayton DTN 445-7217 | Mon Jan 20 1992 17:39 | 12 |
| Anil,
When I first tried to run the IP auto config with the minimum privs that
you suggested, I got a UCX error something to the effect of insufficient
privs. I went back and scanned the UCX release notes for required privs
and found a reference to obne functions requiring BYPASS and SYSPRV, so
I added these privs to my process privledges.
Next time I did the auto config, it worked.
Merlin
|