T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1840.1 | polling prob?? | JETSAM::WOODCOCK | | Thu Nov 21 1991 16:18 | 21 |
| >> Exception: Error occurred while accessing the entity.
Hi Joe,
The experience I have with the above error is typically that the poll failed.
It could be because the node only supports single links (DR250,DECSA), the
node is overloaded with traffic (mngmt messages are the first to get dropped),
your system is overloaded and can't handle the poll rate, or you've got network
problems getting to the node. Pick one. If this is a 100% consistent error
try a SHOW command for the same info for a sanity check. It could also be
something to do with accounts or privs at the node.
>> Expression = (change_of (node4 WR3DR1 circuit syn-2 state,*,*), at every=00:30:00), -
Also, you probably want to monitor the 'substate' rather than 'state' if
you're looking for circuit up/down indicators. State shows whether the circuit
is turned ON or OFF (characteristic) while substate shows up or down (status).
best regards,
brad...
|
1840.2 | | BABY::MOTYL | | Fri Nov 22 1991 09:57 | 8 |
|
Let me tell you a little bit about this network. The entire network is
made up of 56kbs circuits countected though dec router 2000, and these
routers are hosted by 3500's. As of lately the utilization on this
network has been low due to the current status of the ACT's, so not
being able to poll doesn't seem to make sense. As far as accounts or
privs, could you be a little more specific.
|
1840.3 | MCC needs much resources | MFRNW1::SCHUSTER | Karl Schuster @MFR Network Services | Fri Nov 22 1991 11:22 | 12 |
| I get the same error relativly often for slow or busy DECnet nodes.
I have tuned the systems ( Pool, MAXPROCESSCOUNT, Quotas ...), but
we still get "error accessing entity" errors.
NCP connections work fine.
The reason is, that MCC really needs much resources on the remote
systems to be polled ( e.g. multiple management links ).
Perhaps there will be changes in V1.2 ?
Karl
|
1840.4 | | BABY::MOTYL | | Mon Nov 25 1991 15:56 | 9 |
| Karl, in an effort to save some time, could you elaborate some on the
specfice tuning that you did, also, is this tuning talked about in any
of the alarms docs, if so where?
Thanks
Joe
|
1840.5 | We still get the errors .... | MFRNW1::SCHUSTER | Karl Schuster @MFR Network Services | Tue Nov 26 1991 03:52 | 9 |
| re .4
I did not do great things.
You should consider the following (for the remote system):
- enough process entry slots (MAXPROCESSCNT)
- enough pool space ( 25% free ) SRPcount,IRPcount,LRPcount
If the CPU is overloaded, then you have no chance.
In many cases we still get the errors, and I hope that MCC V1.2
consumes less resources for polling.
Karl
|