[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
1595.0. "Messages on the effect of DME on EMA from the EMA Architects" by BLUMON::SYLOR (Architect = Buzzword Generator) Fri Oct 04 1991 00:17
To: EMA Interest
From: EMA Architects
We've had a number of questions from people inside Digital on how
OSF's DME selection affects EMA. Simpler answers to such questions
are always better, so here are some simple but still correct "messages"
that capture the essence of our strategy. If you have other questions,
just ask. We have prepared a detailed response to factual errors in
the DME Rationale, and copies of this are available through the OSF-DME
VAXnotes conference.
To everyone inside Digital:
1 The key DME decision was made months ago when OSF based the DME
RFT and the evaluation criteria on the same fundamental concepts
as EMA, namely: management applications, a framework (i.e.
directors), managed objects (entities), attributes, actions and
notifications (events). We could hardly ask for more than that.
2 While the DME provides a general framework, that framework depends
on the rich functionality of the OSF environment (DCE et.al.)
and the applications and objects that OSF will deliver focus on
management of that environment. EMA has a broader applicability,
and addresses the true integration of management, not just
interoperability. These requirements have not gone away. We
believe our best chance of success in Enterprise Management is
to provide integrated solutions to real customers' needs. The EMA
architecture best addresses that problem. We must do a better
job of implementing that vision.
To users and customers:
3 Digital will integrate EMA and OSF DME such that your investment in
today's EMA products will be protected. In particular:
- EMA entities will be manageable from DME Systems
- DME objects will be manageable from EMA Directors.
To managed object developers inside and outside Digital:
4 As we have been recommending for some time, you should build your
managed objects (entities) using the EMA Common Agent. By doing so,
your managed objects will be manageable via a number of standards,
including SNMP, OSI and eventually, OSF DCE RPC.
5 When the DME framework is available, as an OSF member Digital
will be able to use that technology (including the source code)
at very low cost. Indeed, we will receive periodic snapshots of
the DME as it is developed. We intend to follow the DME
development closely to ensure it is well integrated with EMA.
In particular:
a We will sell OSF DME, and managed objects built on it.
b We will add DME support to the Common Agent. Thus,
managed objects built to the common agent interfaces will
interoperate with a DME environment and be manageable from
applications built to DME APIs.
c We may provide a veneer that maps the Common Agent API to the
"vanilla" OSF DME APIs. Thus, managed objects built to the
Common Agent APIs will be portable to any OSF DME system.
Whether or not we actually build this veneer depends on the
success of OSF DME and the practicality of this approach.
To management application developers inside and outside Digital:
6 As we have been recommending for some time, you should build your
management applications using DECmcc. By doing so, your applications
will be cleanly integrated with other applications developed by
other groups. DECmcc's AMs allow applications to manage more
kinds of managed objects than any other framework technology.
7 In the future, DECmcc's kernel and APIs will evolve into EMA/NAS
management framework services and APIs. We will provide backward
compatibility to support existing applications. We will add new
services and capabilities to the framework as needed to support
more and better management applications. We will continue to
improve the reliability, performance and functionality of
existing services.
8 When the DME framework is available, as an OSF member, Digital
will be able to use that technology (including the source code)
at very low cost. Indeed, we will receive periodic snapshots of
the DME as it is developed. We intend to follow the DME
development closely to ensure it is integrated with the rest of
EMA. In particular:
a We will sell OSF DME, and management applications built on it.
b We will provide the DME mechanisms and protocols as part of
the EMA/NAS management framework in addition to those now
supported by DECmcc. Thus management applications built to
the EMA/NAS framework APIs will interoperate with a DME
environment and can manage any managed object built on DME.
c As part of the evolution of the EMA/NAS management framework,
we will add any DME framework component or API that
enhances the EMA/NAS management framework. This is
consistent with our overall framework strategy to support
standards and to provide whatever services and APIs are
needed to build applications that solve our customers real
needs.
d We could...
build a veneer that maps the EMA/NAS management framework
APIs onto the "vanilla" OSF DME APIs,
or we could ...
port the EMA/NAS management framework onto vanilla OSF/1.
In either case, all management applications that are built
on the EMA/NAS framework APIs would then be portable to any
OSF platform. Which we do (if either) depends on the success
of OSF DME and a technical evaluation of its feasibility.
Finally, to everyone within Digital:
9 In the final analysis, it is management applications and managed
objects that solve customers' needs. The vast majority of our
developers and resources must be applied to doing a good job in
those areas, not the framework. The EMA architects, the Director
Framework developers and Common Agent developers are dedicated
to providing the services application and object developers
need.
10 We should embrace standards, like OSF DME, not fear them. In that
vein, we should recall a quote from FDR...
"The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself!"
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|