T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1394.1 | process quotas: | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Mon Aug 26 1991 17:15 | 11 |
| By the way, my process quotas are as foolows:
Maxjobs: 0 Fillm: 100 Bytlm: 40000
Maxacctjobs: 0 Shrfillm: 0 Pbytlm: 0
Maxdetach: 0 BIOlm: 40 JTquota: 4096
Prclm: 20 DIOlm: 48 WSdef: 512
Prio: 4 ASTlm: 100 WSquo: 3000
Queprio: 0 TQElm: 128 WSextent: 10000
CPU: (none) Enqlm: 600 Pgflquo: 50000
/Nils
|
1394.2 | More info. (Please help...) | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Thu Aug 29 1991 17:00 | 21 |
| Still have the problem...
Aren't there anyone who have had this kind of problem before and has
any clues on what to look for.
What SYSGEN-params is needed. Are there any logical
(MCC_ICONIC_MAP_PM_LOG ?) to set so that I get some more info.
The errormessage is:
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, ..., reason code=00, virtual address=00000100,
PC=00011F25, PSL=0BC00000
Show calls in the debugger tells me that it's the VXC-RTL that accvios
called from SHARE$MCC_ICONIC_MAP_PM. Don't know what routine in there,
because SET IMAGE doesn't work with the IMPM (no symbol table). There
are 5 call-frames between VAXC-RTL and the routine
MCC_INVOKE_PRESENTATION in the module MCC_KERNEL_PRESENTATION.
What can I do?
Help!
/Nils
|
1394.3 | A N Y B O D Y O U T T H E R E ? ? ? ? | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 03 1991 08:20 | 38 |
| I give up!!!
[* flame on *]
ARE THERE ANYONE READING THIS NOTESFILE?
No answers on this topic. Has the IMPM-responsible persons quit
DIGITAL or what....? Usually we see replys very quick, but not this
time...
[* flame off *]
Again, are there any logicals to define to get some more
info on what's going on with the Iconic Map PM?
Now, after running out on ideas on what to do I reinstalled the whole
VS3100 from scratch. VMS v5.4 + DECWindows, VAX-C, DNS v1.1 and DECmcc
BMS v1.1. Everything installed from July-91 CD-distribution.
The [MCC]-directory is on a separate disk than the system-disk.
Everything looks fine; the mcc-IVP runs OK, DNS-directories are setup.
Process-quotas set up according to rel-notes.
Still, I can't run the Iconic Map PM! It crashes with an ACC-VIO.
I'm running on a standalone WS with no connections to any networks,
(DECnet is running). 16 MB memory, Systemdisk on a RZ23 with pagefile
(45000 blocks) and swap-file on another RZ23. [MCC]-dir and
[DNS$SERVER]-dir on a RZ55 (it's not my disk, so I can't use it as
systemdisk wich would be the normal...)
Anyone who has any clues on what to do/look for/change/setup/..../
regards,
Nils
|
1394.4 | It can't hurt | MAYDAY::ANDRADE | The sentinel (.)(.) | Tue Sep 03 1991 09:14 | 13 |
|
Did you try, giving your MCC account quotas a big increase, specially
BYTLM, try doubling it from 40K to 80K.
Also, it can't hurt to make sure of the following:
You are running standalone VMS. You do have DECnet setup as a regular
node anyway, right ? With all default accesses, objects, and so on.
Another thing to check, is the DNS access priviledges. Do the objects
and directories give access to the account running DECmcc,...
Gil
|
1394.5 | | TOOK::F_MESSINGER | | Tue Sep 03 1991 11:12 | 9 |
|
What are you mcc_maps, mcc_uil, mcc_icons, decw$user_defaults logicals
set to?
What are the protections on mcc_icons:*icon.dat files?
Is anything printed on the terminal before it craps out?
Fred
|
1394.6 | Check protections of files too | NSSG::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:43 | 4 |
| I have seen this kind of think when I didn't have access to all the
files in MCC_COMMON:
s/rob
|
1394.7 | reply to .5 | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:26 | 16 |
| repl .5
>>> What are you mcc_maps, mcc_uil, mcc_icons, decw$user_defaults logicals
>>> set to?
mcc-logicals points to MCC_COMMON (= RZ55:<MCC>)
decw$user_defaults points to SYS$LOGIN
>>> What are the protections on mcc_icons:*icon.dat files?
It shouldn't have anything to do with protection on files.
I try it from the SYSTEM-account with all all privs.
>>> Is anything printed on the terminal before it craps out?
NO, just ACCESS VIOLATION...
/Nils
|
1394.8 | reply to .6 | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:29 | 6 |
| repl .6
It shouldn't have to have anything to do with protection on files.
I tried to run with all privs enabled.
/Nils
|
1394.9 | | TOOK::F_MESSINGER | | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:34 | 6 |
|
Allow me to ask the question again...What are the protections of the files
set to?
Fred
|
1394.10 | reply to .4 | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:48 | 28 |
| repl .4
>>> Did you try, giving your MCC account quotas a big increase, specially
>>> BYTLM, try doubling it from 40K to 80K.
Yes, no change.
>>> You are running standalone VMS. You do have DECnet setup as a regular
>>> node anyway, right ?
YES!
>>> With all default accesses, objects, and so on.
I guess so; It's a default VMS- DECnet- DECwindows installation.
Nothing special. What accesses, objects is needed?
$MC NCP SHOW KNOWN OBJECT gives $IPCACP, $MOM, $NICONFIG,
MCC_DNA4_EVL, SMISERVER, TASK, X$X0, FAL, HLD, NML, REMACP, MIRROR,
EVL, MAIL, PHONE, CTERM, DNS$TA, DNS$BACK, VPM, DTR.
Anything missing?
>>> Another thing to check, is the DNS access priviledges. Do the objects
>>> and directories give access to the account running DECmcc,...
As I understand it, default installation of DNS gives all users all
access to all objects. Right?
$ MC DNS$CONTROL SHOW ACCESS on all directories gives me all access
as well as on all objects.
/Nils
|
1394.11 | fileprotection on MCC_COMMON | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:54 | 10 |
| repl .9
all files in MCC_COMMON have the protection (RWED, RWED, RWED, RE)
except for:
MCC_DEFINITION.DAT, MCC_DICTIONARY.DAT, MCC_DISPATCH_TABLE.DAT,
MCC_META_DEFINITION.DAT, MCC_META_DICTIONARY.DAT,
MCC_MIR_ATTRIBUTE.DAT, MCC_MIR_DIRECTORY.DAT, MCC_PTB_PARSER.BPT
which have (RWED, RWED, RWED, R)
/nils
|
1394.12 | more tests done, still ACC-VIO | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Wed Sep 04 1991 18:24 | 26 |
| I've run the AUDIT_MCC.COM-procedure and it says that the
sysgen-parameter PAGEFILE_PAGE is 30992 and should be >= 120000.
I don't recognize that SYSGEN-parameter. I created one more pagefile
on the RZ55-disk, 120000 blocks, and no more complaints about
PAGEFILE_PAGE. Shouldn't the text say "PAGEFILE-SIZE instead of
PAGEFILE_PAGE" (but that's another story...)?
It also says that RDB is not started. Is that a requirement? If so, I
missed it in the rel-notes as well as in the install-guide. Is that
the problem, or is RDB only needed for the exporter-fm?
I'm also told that 16Mb is not adaquate to run DECmcc, but I guess
that's just a performance issue; I guess that lack of memory can't
cause the ACC-VIO.
After speaking with Jill Callander today (thanks Jill for your time)
she suggested to try running DECWRITE to test a 'heavy'
DECwindows-application to see if the problem could have anything to do
with VMS/DECwindows not properly setup. Sorry to say, DECWRITE works
really well, but still ACC-VIO on IMPM.
What else can I do?
I guess I could need some help from above now...
/nils
|
1394.13 | AUDIT_MCC update available | NSSG::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Thu Sep 05 1991 14:41 | 6 |
| Thanks for bug report on Audit_MCC. I agree and have updated the
proceedure to indicate that it is Pagefile Size that needs increasing.
Also, I updated the text around the RDB startup and memory size.
s/rob
|
1394.14 | running out of ideas, memory may just be it | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Sat Sep 07 1991 10:13 | 29 |
| Nils,
I really don't have much in the way of ideas, my last attempt
at this would be to try running the same sequence of events that
the IM PM does at start up from the FCL.
Unluckily, since you are a clean installation that really amounts
to doing just about nothing, except accessing the dictionary to
setup some of the menu items.
There have ben so many notes here, did you say that the FCL
worked alright? also have you tried the FCL forms mode that
requires more memory as well.
Now note that insufficient memory in the system can actually
cause an accvio if the kernel is unable to load the image into
memory. We try to handle all cases where insufficient memory can
be returned but sometimes these get missed and cause an accvio.
You see I don't know of anyone running with only the 16meg of
memory. Is anyone out thee doing it? and did you have to do anything
special to get it started?
For now, do a quick test of some commands on the domains and
registration FM to see if things work okay there. (IM PM uses
these modules at startup). Attempt to show domain * all ident, and
try to register anything.
jill
|
1394.15 | repl to .14 | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:23 | 80 |
| repl .14
>>> did you say that the FCL worked alright? also have you tried the
>>> FCL forms mode that requires more memory as well.
YES and YES.
>>> Now note that insufficient memory in the system can actually
>>> cause an accvio if the kernel is unable to load the image into
>>> memory. We try to handle all cases where insufficient memory can
>>> be returned but sometimes these get missed and cause an accvio.
>>> You see I don't know of anyone running with only the 16meg of
>>> memory. Is anyone out thee doing it? and did you have to do anything
>>> special to get it started?
To get what started? I haven't done anything specail to get anything
started, except that IMPM isn't starting, but that you all know by now.
I tried at the bank to run IMPM at a 16Mb B/W VS3100 (satelite in a
cluster) and it worked OK.
>>> Attempt to show domain * all ident
Works OK.
>>> and try to register anything.
Hmmm... This is what I do: (I'm not very good at using FCL, I've done
all the registering with the IMPM, so maybe I do something wrong)
MCC> regi node4 .dna_node.knutte ! KNUTTE is the name of this node
SYNONYM = KNUTTE
Node4 KNUTTE_NS:.dna_node.knutte
AT 9-SEP-1991 19:59:43
The requested operation cannot be completed
MCC Unhandled Service Reply = Internal error in DECnet Phase IV AM.
Here I do a CREATE OBJECT .DNA_NODE.KNUTTE with DNS$CONTROL
MCC> regi node4 .dna_node.knutte
SYNONYM = KNUTTE
Node4 KNUTTE_NS:.dna_node.knutte
AT 9-SEP-1991 20:00:17
The requested operation cannot be completed
MCC Unhandled Service Reply = Internal error in DECnet Phase IV AM.
MCC> dir node4 .dna_node.knutte
Node4 KNUTTE_NS:.dna_node.knutte
AT 9-SEP-1991 20:08:36
Directory successful.
Registered Name = KNUTTE_NS:.dna_node.knutte
MCC> show node4 knutte all ident
Node4 62.146
AT 9-SEP-1991 20:18:02 Identifiers
Examination of Attributes shows:
Address = 62.146
Name = KNUTTE
MCC> deregi node4 .dna_node.knutte
Node4 KNUTTE_NS:.dna_node.knutte
AT 9-SEP-1991 20:19:36
The requested operation cannot be completed
MCC Unhandled Service Reply = Internal error in DECnet Phase IV AM.
Looking with DNS$CONTROL the node is still there.
I don't understand anything no more....
Any help is very much appreciated....
/nils
|
1394.16 | 16 Mbs tested okay with me | VCSESU::WADE | | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:31 | 11 |
| >You see I don't know of anyone running with only the 16meg of
>memory. Is anyone out thee doing it? and did you have to do anything
>special to get it started?
I've installed ssb 1.1 and applied all the patches on 16 mb 3100s
and all was fine.
Just a WAG but did you say VS3100 or WS3100?
Bill
|
1394.17 | VAXstation 3100/GPX | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Mon Sep 09 1991 16:43 | 8 |
| repl .16
>>> Just a WAG but did you say VS3100 or WS3100?
$ write sys$output f$getsyi("HW_NAME") ==> VAXstation 3100/GPX
/Nils
|
1394.18 | Grasping at straws | TOOK::GUERTIN | Don't fight fire with flames | Mon Sep 09 1991 17:14 | 4 |
| Try increasing your Pgflquo to 100000. Also make sure your sysgen
parameter VIRTUALPAGECNT is greater than your Pgflquo value.
-Matt.
|
1394.19 | Case closed. | NENE::D_WONG | David Wong @LKG 2-2 | Tue Sep 10 1991 17:22 | 11 |
|
Nils has the logical MCC_COMMON defined as disk:<MCC_COMMON>, and
Iconic Map is expecting disk:[MCC_COMMON]. So, that's why it
acc-vio'd when it's parsing the icon files spec.
Solution for now: Change MCC_COMMON to disk:[MCC_COMMON] (and don't
forget to change SYS$STARTUP:MCC_LOGICAL_DIR.COM.
Solution for future: Iconic map will be fixed to handle both cases.
\david.
|
1394.20 | YIIPPPIIIIIEEEE, the bug is found! | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren EIS/Project dpmt, Sweden DTN 876-8287 | Tue Sep 10 1991 17:28 | 20 |
| Finally I found the bug.
When looking for mcc_*_icon.dat-files the IMPM scans in the full
filename for a ']', like in "DISK1:[MCC]MCC_BRIDGE_ICON.DAT;1" to find
the start of the name itself. Well the problem is if MCC_COMMON is
defined as DISK1:<MCC> (which it is in my installation). The full
filename would be DISK1:<MCC>MCC_BRIDGE_ICON.DAT;1 and no beginning is
found ==> ACC-VIO.
To verify my thaughts, I redefined MCC_COMMON to be DISK1:[MCC] and
guess what:
I T W O R K S !!!!!
Thanks everyone, especially DAVID WONG, for all sugestions and
help. It's nice to know you're out there.
/Nils
|
1394.21 | Let the system parse it? | NSSG::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Thu Sep 12 1991 14:03 | 5 |
| Hmmm, wouldn't it be easier to use the VMS System Service to parse the
filename and return the part wanted? There must be a system call which
is equivilent to the DCL Lexical F$PARSE.
s/rob
|