| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I apologize if this is covered else where (a pointer will be welcome)
As I understand it the "next" release of the SNMP AM will support the
MIB II. Does this mean that we can categorically state that the SNMP AM
V1.1 implements the RFC 1158 ( as opposed to the 1066 MIB I, one) ?
If not, then which RFC can be quoted ?
Amrit
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1366.1 | BSYBEE::EGOLF | John C. Egolf LKG2-2/T02 x226-7874 | Wed Aug 21 1991 12:46 | 9 | |
It will implement/support MIB I *and* MIB II in addition to having the ability to easily add vendor specific private mibs that are in the ASN.1 concise MIB format. As for the "RFC" specifically, our SNMP heavies are out in California doing Interop hot staging. I'll ask them to be explicit when they return. JCE | |||||
| 1366.2 | The doc says... | NEOV00::MRIVERA | Mario Rivera, EIS Monterrey Mexico | Fri Aug 23 1991 14:05 | 10 |
Preliminary doc of SNMP AM says (page 1-2) that it supports RFC 1156 (MIB I) RFC 1213 (MIB II) I revised my notes and RFC 1156 obsoletes 1066; and RFC 1213 obsoletes 1158. Regards, Mario | |||||
| 1366.3 | thanks for the pointer | CLARID::PATEL | We'll get it right on the night | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:33 | 3 |
Thanks a bunch
Amrit
| |||||