T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1278.1 | Check your LAN connection; Try a STATION command on it | MCDOUG::MCPHERSON | i'm only 5 foot one... | Tue Jul 23 1991 17:41 | 21 |
| The delay is becuase the AM code is trying over and over to get to the Translan,
with some delay. There is a timeout value that basically says how long the
AM should wait before giving up.
CANNOT COMMUNICTATE WITH TARGET means that you couldn't make ethernet connect-
ivity with the box from your DECmcc system. You're *sure* your DECmcc system
is on the same LAN, right?
If you want to eliminate whether or not it's the TRANSLAN AM, try REGISTERing
the TRANSLAN as a STATION and see what happens.
e.g.
MCC> REGISTER STATION translan_station 008-00-7C-00-48-31
If that fails, check one more time to make sure that you have *direct* ethernet
connectivity to the Translan (no routers between you...) and if you *still*
have the same problem report back here with detailed information about the
configuration
- Translan types
- Translan software version on each
- Translan net configuration (esp with respect to the DECmcc system)
|
1278.2 | REGISTER STATION worked | TROOA::GILBERT | | Wed Jul 24 1991 11:29 | 14 |
| Thanks for the help. I have asked the customer to verify the direct
access aspect to the point where I am becoming a bother. However, I
did try the register station command and, after almost the same delay,
it registered successfully. I attribute the delay this time to the
slowness of DNS as well as having made a connection to the station.
So, where do I go from here? Should I be trying to modify the timers
within the TRANSLAN AM or do I have a bigger problem here? If the
TRANSLAN timers are respectable, I must have a network problem. If
not, can I increase the timers?
Thanks again,
Peter
|
1278.3 | Still need some environmental/configuartion information | MCDOUG::MCPHERSON | i'm only 5 foot one... | Wed Jul 24 1991 12:41 | 31 |
| If you were able to register the TRanslan as a STATION, then your have local
Ethernet connectivity to the Translan.
If the Translan is *busy* then it will drop management requests on the floor.
Once again: please report in here with some environmental information:
Is the Translan busy?
What type of Translan?
What Software version is the Translan running?
What how many serial lines on the Translan?
what speed for each line?
how busy is each line?
Capture output from the following commands and post it here as well.
MCC> SHOW STATION 08-00-7C-00-48-31 ALL ATTRIBUTES
MCC> SHOW TRANSLAN 08-00-7C-00-48-31 ALL ATTRIBUTES
If the Translan *still* doesn't respond, then exit MCC, and at DCL
$ DEFINE MCC_TRANSLAN_AM_LOG 26
then start mcc again and do this:
MCC> SHOW TRANSLAN 08-00-7C-00-48-31 ALL ATTRIBUTES
Post the full resulting output here (or mail it to me) and we'll see
if we can figure out what's going on
|
1278.4 | Spanning Tree=False was the problem | TROOA::GILBERT | | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:01 | 11 |
| After much confusion with some help from Doug MacPherson I found that
the customer had set the Spanning Tree variable to False on Group 0,
which contains the Ethernet port. Setting this variable also sets
TX/RX Management messages to False, presumably telling the Vitalink
bridge to ignore everything I was sending it.
Some documented bridge settings would have helped. The Vitalink AM
book says nothing about actual bridge parameter settings, only those on
the VAX and DECmcc side.
Peter
|