[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

1180.0. "DECmcc Status Update June 17,1991 " by TOOK::JSG () Fri Jun 21 1991 14:31

	The latest version of the DECmcc Status Update, June 17,1991, is now
available.  Please remember that this document contains Digital Confidential
and Proprietary material.  Vendors that in our in the unannounced section
may not be discussed with customers.

	The report is available in three formats (.ln3, .ps, .txt).  The .txt
format is provided on an as is basis(ie. it is .dvi to .txt conversion,
so.............)

	The files are:

		TOOK::USER$43:[JSG.PUBLIC]VENDOR_LIST.LN3;101
					  VENDOR_LIST.PS;4
					  VENDOR_LIST.TXT;3

JonG
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1180.1Where is System Center ?MAIL::CLAYTONMerlin Clayton DTN 445-7217Thu Jun 27 1991 17:3916
Jon,

Why isn't SCI on the strategic vendor list referred to in the original note?

I hope this isn't an indication that SCI is dropping out of the DECmcc 
strategic program, and therefore, Digital is back to ground-zero for SNA
management capabilities.

Is there problems with the SCI/NETmaster/NETview DECmcc development program?

If so, could you please fill us in?

Thanks.

Merlin

1180.2Cause it is Joint Development?NSSG::R_SPENCENets don't fail me now...Mon Jul 01 1991 16:237
    I would guess that SCI isn't on the Stratigic Vendor list because
    we have a joint development effort going with them. This is much
    stronger than the agreements with the SVPs.
    
    If this isn't the case, please correct me though.
    
    s/rob
1180.3Have a problem with the documentADO75A::SHARPEC is bliss?Mon Jul 01 1991 22:5422
I get this error when I print the file:

%LPS-W-UNDEF, undefined: Name not known - offending command is ln03:resetpoints
-CPS-I-JOB_ID, for job VENDOR_LIST (queue ADO_EIS_POST, entry 663) on ADO_EIS_CP
S

After deleting these (ln03:resetpoints) from the file, I get the following:

%LPS-W-UNDEF, undefined: Name not known - offending command is ln03:defpoint
-CPS-I-JOB_ID, for job VENDOR_LIST (queue ADO_EIS_POST, entry 670) on ADO_EIS_CP
S

The offending command exists in the file as:

337 2604 p ln03:defpoint 33(544.88998pt,)
0 r ln03:defpoint 35(51.26999pt,)


What Can I do? Can you re-create the file for an ln03r?

Regards
Richard Sharpe
1180.4RE: Where is System Center ?TOOK::JSGTue Jul 09 1991 11:2910
Merlin,

	SCI isn't on this list simply because we are not envolved with them.
The SCI is a joint dev deal between T&N Eng and SCI.  For completeness it
should probably be listed in some fashion.

	As a matter of fact the project with SCI just closed Phase 1 of the
pahse review process.

JonG
1180.5DECmcc Strategic Vendor Program Status Update -- Dec 18,1991TOOK::JSGWed Dec 18 1991 17:3017
	The latest version of the DECmcc Strategic Vendor Program Status
Update, December 18,1991, is now available.  Please remember that this document
contains Digital Confidential and Proprietary material.  Vendors that in our in
the unannounced section may not be discussed with customers.

	The report is available in three formats (.ln3, .ps, .txt).  The .txt
format is provided on an as is basis(ie. it is .dvi to .txt conversion,
so.............)

	The files are:

		TOOK::USER$43:[JSG.PUBLIC]VENDOR_LIST.LN3;112
					  VENDOR_LIST.PS;5
					  VENDOR_LIST.TXT;4

JonG
1180.6DECmcc SVP Program Status Updated pulled.TOOK::JSGThu Dec 19 1991 09:288
Folks,

	There is an error in this update. I have pulled the vendor status
uopdate to correct it.  I will put it back online later today.  Sorry for
the inconvience.  If you have already made a copy then please delete it.
Sorry for the inconvience.

JonG
1180.7File Protection ViolationULYSSE::JULLIENVincent JullienThu Dec 19 1991 11:237
I am not able to access the VENDOR_LIST.* series of files, because of a file 
protection lock... 


	%RMS-E-PRV, insufficient privilege or file protection violation

Thanks for your help, Vincent
1180.8See note 1180.6.MCDOUG::MCPHERSONScientific progress goes 'Boink!'Thu Dec 19 1991 12:070
1180.9DECmcc Strategic Vendor Program Status Update -- Dec 19,1991 (BACK ONLINEQ)TOOK::JSGThu Dec 19 1991 15:4719
(Now BACK ONLINE! Offline for awhile due to an error.)

	The latest version of the DECmcc Strategic Vendor Program Status
Update, December 19,1991, is now available.  Please remember that this document
contains Digital Confidential and Proprietary material.  Vendors that in our in
the unannounced section may not be discussed with customers.

	The report is available in three formats (.ln3, .ps, .txt).  The .txt
format is provided on an as is basis(ie. it is .dvi to .txt conversion,
so.............)

	The files are:

		TOOK::USER$43:[JSG.PUBLIC]VENDOR_LIST.LN3;112
					  VENDOR_LIST.PS;5
					  VENDOR_LIST.TXT;4

JonG
1180.10Correction to the file version numbers.TOOK::JSGThu Dec 19 1991 15:5010
	This is what I get for using cut & paste. Note 1180.9 listed the
incorrect version numbers for the status update files. They should be:

		TOOK::USER$43:[JSG.PUBLIC]VENDOR_LIST.LN3;114
					  VENDOR_LIST.PS;6
					  VENDOR_LIST.TXT;5

JonG

1180.11can't print VENDOR_LIST.PS;6TNPUBS::CHANDONAITset me free in the deep blue seaThu Dec 26 1991 11:329
    RE: 1180.10
    When I sent the VENDOR_LIST.PS;6 file to print, it "terminated with
    error status". The error message is:
    
    %LPS-W-UNDEF, undefined: Name not known - offending command is
    ln03:resetpoints
    %LPS-E-FLUSHING, Rest of Job (to EOJ) will be ignored
    
    -Ruth Chandonait
1180.12RIPPLE::KOPEC_STSeattle WA 206-(DTN545)-637-4207Mon Mar 16 1992 20:404
    the problem with the PS file is still there.  can someone please
    address it?
    
    Thx, Stan
1180.13Fix to .ps version & note on .txt version.TOOK::JSGThu Mar 26 1992 17:4419
	I fixed the 12/19/91 .ps version of the Status Update.  It took
a latex/postscript guru to fix it.  Actually he didn't fix it we just
tried several of his environments until it worked right.

	Also the .txt version prints out nicely if you do it in landscape mode.

	Just to recap the files are:

		TOOK::USER$43:[JSG.PUBLIC]


			VENDOR_LIST.LN3;114
			VENDOR_LIST.PS;6
			VENDOR_LIST.TXT;5
		


JonG