[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
1067.0. "Attribute group question" by QUIVER::CIARFELLA (Saabless and happy) Wed May 29 1991 11:34
Im my MS I've got the following attribute group defined:
ATTRIBUTE GROUP SNMP Trap Addresses = 90:
DIRECTIVES-SUPPORTED = (Show,Add,Remove),
CATEGORIES = (CONFIGURATION),
ATTRIBUTE-LIST = (
Trap Address Table,
Trap Address )
END ATTRIBUTE GROUP SNMP Trap Addresses;
When I run the IMPM, this group is highlighted in the operations window
when I select the ADD,SHOW, or REMOVE directives (as expected).
But, unexpectedly, this group is highlighted when I select SET (which
is not part of the DIRECTIVES-SUPPORTED clause).
I do not want this group defined for SET. Can I do this?
Also, I'm running V1.1 and the two attributes (trap address table,trap
address) are defined with ACCESS = SETTABLE.
Thanks for the help,
Paul C
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1067.1 | | VERNA::V_GILBERT | | Wed May 29 1991 11:38 | 8 |
| Paul,
The reason that you see the directive SET is because one or more of your
attributes have ACCESS=SETTABLE. Whenever this is the case, we include
the directive Set. If you change the access of both to non-settable,
the Set directive should not be displayed.
Verna
|
1067.2 | Add/Remove without Set? | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Wed May 29 1991 12:43 | 13 |
| I don't understand what meaning Add and Remove have on an attribute group.
Add and Remove modify values of set-valued attributes -- what does that mean
for an attribute group? I suppose it could have some meaning if the group
consists entirely of attributes of the same (set-valued) datatype. Then ADD
<group-name> {1,2,3} could mean add the value {1,2,3} to the values of all
the members of the group.
How can you possibly have an attribute (or group) which has Add and Remove
defined but not Set? That is just perverse (and a violation of the Entity
Model)! If the attribute can be modified by Add and Remove then why are you
trying to stop the manager replacing the value altogether with Set?
Graham
|
1067.3 | | POLE::LEMMON | | Mon Jul 15 1991 13:26 | 13 |
| The DIRECTIVES-SUPPORTED definition is obsolete. The MS compiler
should have rejected it.
Attribute groups apply only to examine and modify directives. Set
is a modify directive and for it to be in the menu at least one
attribute within the group is settable.
There isn't a mechanism yet to filter out which directives belong
in the operations for a specific entity. We plan on implementing
this functionslity after v1.2.
/Jim
/Jim
|