T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
786.1 | use the Phase4Name as a synonym | NAC::SCHLENER | | Tue Mar 12 1991 08:46 | 18 |
| You can have the user register the DNS name with a synonym which is
the Phase4Name. Then when you get a request, you need to determine if
you were given the DNS name and hence, need to go get its synonym.
I think the way we did it in the DECnet Phase 4 AM, since we could
accept either a Phase4Name, Phase4Address or a fullname, is to list
the identifiers in the MSL using the Phase4Name typed identifier first.
We followed that with the identifier which had the datatype of
Phase4Address. Then that was followed by the Fullname identifier. This
was due to the fact that the PM's would first try to fit the entity id
to the first msl's identifier (Phase4Name). If the entity id's datatype
fit all the rules for being a Phase4Name, viola - it's datatype would
be Phase4Name and the PM would use the first msl identifier.
Since pretty much any string could be a fullname, we kept the fullname
identifier as last - as a catchall.
Cindy
|
786.2 | But what are the MCC calls | MINDER::BLOWERG | | Tue Mar 12 1991 08:58 | 4 |
| That is the bit we have done, what we need to know are the MCC calls
required to get the synonym.
|
786.3 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Tue Mar 12 1991 12:19 | 12 |
| The synonym interface is a private interface to DNS from the DECNET AMs
designed to integrate the naming conventions of Phase IV and Phase V
DECNET with DNS. They are not documented in the SRM and should not
be used by other AMs as far as I know.
I guess we need to know how your AM relates to DECnet, or have you chosen
the Phase4Name identifier datatype for some other reason?
The normal DNS call to use would be mcc_dns_get_identifiers which will
return all alternate identifiers for a given primary (fullname ID).
|
786.4 | what are the parameters ? | MINDER::BLOWERG | | Tue Mar 12 1991 12:35 | 8 |
| mcc_dns_get_identifiers sounds like the call we want. What are the
parameters for the call.
Unfortunately without the SRM V1.1 its a bit like shooting in the
dark.
Thanks.
Graham
|
786.5 | | TOOK::WONG | | Wed Mar 13 1991 09:34 | 6 |
| The routines have been forwarded to the requestor. Also,
the availability of the documentation is being looked into.
regards,
\steve
|