[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:	DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:	Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:	TAEC::BEROUD

Created:	Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:	Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	6497
Total number of notes:	27359

758.0. "Phase V AM with DNVEXT node?" by CABOOS::WRIDE (Remember what the Dormouse said) Wed Feb 27 1991 14:16

I noticed that the recent FT release of DNVEXT supports a CMIP Management 
Listener, so thought it would be fun to try installing it and using the 
Phase V AM to talk to it. I deleted the node as a Phase IV entity and 
added it back in as a Phase V entity, then did a 

$ MANAGE/ENTERPRISE SHOW NODE APO.LIONEL ALL ATTRIBUTES
DECmcc (V1.1.0)
Node ARTMCC_NS:.APO.LIONEL 
AT 27-FEB-1991 13:56:36 All Attributes
                                   Name = 
%MCC-E-FULLNAME_ERROR, error in Full Name value
%MCC-E-FULLNAME_ERROR, error in Full Name value
                      Functions Enabled = {}
                                     ID = AA-00-03-01-10-D1
                                  State = Off
                                    UID = 57190000-8A1D-11C8-8000-FFFFFFFFFFFF
                     Changes of Address = 0 Changes
                          Changes of ID = 2 Changes
                          Creation Time =  1-JAN-1990 00:00:00.00
                   IDROM Check Failures = 0 Failures
                                Renames = 0 Renames
                      Maximum Listeners = 0
                                Version = T5.0.2
                    Implementation Desc = ""
                               Location = ""
                           MAIL Account = ""
                           Phone Number = ""
                                Remarks = ""
                     Responsible Person = ""
                              Text File = ""

That raises two questions: 

  1. Is it really necessary to delete the Node4 before registering as a 
     Node? (I got a message about incompatible attributes or something.) 
     Eventually all nodes will go from Phase IV to Phase V, so it seems 
     there should be an easy way to make that change in DECmcc. 

  2. Having the same problem with the name as with the DNU software. Two 
     examples don't make a rule, but this is a disturbing trend. (Defining 
     MCC_DNA5_AM_LOG to 200 didn't make any difference.) 

                                        Steve

T.R Title User Personal
Name Date Lines

758.1 maybe a known bug in DNU EFT1 NAC::ENGLAND Thu Mar 07 1991 09:35 8

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
758.1	maybe a known bug in DNU EFT1	NAC::ENGLAND		`Thu Mar 07 1991 09:35`	8
	Are you using the first EFT release of DECnet-ULTRIX? That release has a known bug in sending back the node name which is fixed in the EFT update kit. If you want a pointer to the (FINAL!!) DNU EFT update kit, send mail to me at netrix::england, DNU is looking for people to test it. ben

    Are you using the first EFT release of DECnet-ULTRIX?  That release has
    a known bug in sending back the node name which is fixed in the EFT
    update kit.  If you want a pointer to the (FINAL!!) DNU EFT update kit,
    send mail to me at netrix::england, DNU is looking for people to
    test it.
    
    ben