Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hello, I just ran into a problem when installing the freshly available TS AM: the DECmcc/Director & BMS license check fails miserably and aborts the installation, with the message : "requires decmcc". This is despite the fact that MCC is installed and that I have the required licenses. I commented out the license check in the KITINSTAL.COM and was amused by the fact that this is known as a "potential problems" (re: the comments in KITINSTAL.COM...). I'm afraid it changed from a potential to kinetic ! Installation now underway... I'll go and have a cup of coffee while the parse tables get rebuilt ! Regards, Philippe.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
679.1 | SCRPIO::LIZBICKI | Thu Jan 31 1991 12:42 | 10 | ||
Philippe - What version of DECmcc are you running? It looks like the installation procedure is checking only for V1.0 licenses, while it should actually check for V1.0 or V1.1. Lynne | |||||
679.2 | ? | MKNME::DANIELE | Fri Feb 01 1991 08:21 | 11 | |
> It looks like the installation procedure is checking only for > V1.0 licenses, while it should actually check for V1.0 or > V1.1. Are you sure? I don't believe the callback checks versions. At any rate, the V1.0 TCP/IP AM checks for BMS or Director V1.0 licenses, and it installs fine over V1.1 licenses. The only failure I've seen is because there wasn't a valid BMS/Dir license at all ( but there WAS a EMS or SMS license... ) Mike |