Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Last week we developped an AM for managing UB ethernet hardware . When integating this AM in DECMCC we encoutered a problem that we didn't really solve . For talking to UB entities we've used UB proprietary protocol and UCX udp sockets . When compiling linking our Am with UCX$IPC.OLB/LIB library , nothing wrong appeared . Enroll of AM was succesfull , but when we tried to use commands such as " show ub pcub all counters " we received an "access violation" when calling the routine "SOCKET" . Then we recompiled and relinked the AM with another library , UCX$IPC_SHR.EXE/SHARE . Enrollment was still successfull , but with commands we got another error message : " opcode reserved for digital" or something like that . Finally , wu used UCX udp QIOs an rewrote our AM . All was OK . ( we tried to use MCC_QIO but didn't find the routine description in SRM V1.1 ) This could be an issue when integrating some software developped on other UNIX platforms into the AM code . ch.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
631.1 | slow down | MKNME::DANIELE | Thu Jan 17 1991 08:50 | 8 | |
It sounds like simple programming errors. I use the UCX sockets with no problem, and the code worked with NO modification on Ultrix. If you'd like we can follow this up off line, but I suggest you just go back to the socket documentation and work it out. Regards, Mike | |||||
631.2 | may be programming errors | TLSE01::HAGENMULLER | Fri Jan 18 1991 11:39 | 8 | |
may be simple programming errors . however , the code used for talking to UB entity was tested out of DECMCC and worked well . We used UCX V1.2 . May be my doc set was not complete . I you agree I can send you the code ( < 50 line s in C ) and follow this up off line , but I don't want to waste your time anyway . thanks , ch |