T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
605.1 | Let's call it a "Restriction" | TOOK::CAREY | | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:43 | 17 |
|
Bug or Feature? How 'bout restriction?
I didn't realize that NCL rebounded from that error.
MCC could probably be trained to respond similarly, I'm just not sure
that we should spend the resources on that right now.
We have high hopes that as the routers mature they will not be as prone
to this sort of resource problem and the whole thing will become a
non-issue. Perhaps that is wishful thinking.
Anyway, thanks for pointing out the difference, do you have strong
opinions in either direction?
-Jim Carey
|
605.2 | | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Thu Jan 10 1991 15:44 | 17 |
| > We have high hopes that as the routers mature they will not be as prone
> to this sort of resource problem and the whole thing will become a
> non-issue. Perhaps that is wishful thinking.
You must be joking :-)
Actually that particular problem seems to have gone away. At least I
haven't seen it here (in OSIrouter 500 development) for a while. However,
the DEMSA-based routers will always be very tight on memory (even newer
routers aren't going to be happy to waste much memory which could be used to
support larger networks).
It would be nice if MCC continued. That error can sometimes be fatal and
sometimes not (it depends where the resource problem occurs). However, the
CMIP protocol indicates unambiguously whether there is more data.
Graham
|
605.3 | I'd rather see all the information | MEK::KENNEDY | Give me your watch & I'll tell you | Thu Jan 10 1991 16:52 | 24 |
| Re: .1
I'd prefer DECmcc to display the rest of the info, assuming that its possible.
In this case (see rest of note), the problem is completely reproducible, so
I don't see how retrying the command (hoping that the resource situation has
improved) would help.
Re: .2
> Actually that particular problem seems to have gone away. At least I
> haven't seen it here (in OSIrouter 500 development) for a while.
I'm anxiously awaiting the EFT update now. (tho not relevant to this
discussion, I think the error might be misleading:
Show Node MEK_NS:.vrtnr1 Routing Destination Node AA-00-04-00-3C-30
%NCL-E-INVALIDCMLDATA, return data corrupt or incorrectly encoded
at %X00000000000000000000000000000000
Command failed due to:
no resources available
It always fails on this node, which (coincidentally?) is the router itself.
I'm pretty ignorant about what's going on here, but it doesn't really smell
like a resource problem to me.
|
605.4 | | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:23 | 7 |
| There was indeed a non-resource related problem with the Routing Destination
Node management which has been fixed. It may well have been related to
this.
By the way, the %NCL-E-INVALIDCMLDATA error is fixed in EFTU as well.
Graham
|