[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

581.0. "Security issues" by CCIIS1::ROGGEBAND (_ �hili��e _) Thu Dec 27 1990 10:10

    Hello,
    
    Several of my customers have raised the following security issues. They
    would like to be able in enable / disable access to VERBS. 
    
    An exemple, they want to allow operators to look at things ("Show") but
    not to modify them (no "Set"). They would like DECmcc to provide some
    way of doing this, as the objects they are referring may have no access
    control built in. One way of doing this is to implement some form in a
    Specific AM, but when the object is a SNMP-type object and they use the
    standard SNMP ?
    
    Other exmples of security issues concern the maps & registration of
    objects. They want to configure the maps for the operators, but do not
    want the operator to modify anything on the map, so they would like to
    inhibit the use of the toolbox. Thay would also like to be able to
    customize the interface so that it offers no "Save Map" option, and no
    "register" command. I have told them that one way to achieve (some of)
    this is to set access rights on DNS directories and to put ACL's on map
    files, and / or on FM images, but they feel this is a somewhat messy
    way of doing things.
    
    To cut a long story short, the main criticism is the same as the one we
    had with DECnet Monitor : the same interface is used to configure what
    we want to manage, and to manage the things we just configured.
    Customers dread the idea that an over-privileged and under-trained
    (whose fault is that ?) operator may try a "DEREGISTER object *"
    command  "just to see what happens"... but they would like a DECmcc
    integrated way of preventing this. Anything in the pipelines ?
    
    I'll add that ALL customers I've show the product to are impressed by
    the DECwindows PM. Comment from the IS manager of Air France : "I do
    not want my operators to see this, they'll ask me to get rid of
    NETview".
    
    May 1991 be the "Year of DECmcc".
    
    Philippe.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
581.1Maybe the Easter Bunny will bring it!!TOOK::F_MESSINGERThu Dec 27 1990 13:318
    
    Re -.1
    
    Several people have expressed the need to "lock" or "unlock" the
    map window.  The mechanics of implementing this are quite simple.
    It's on the wish list! 
    
    Fred
581.2an important topic -- or so it looksGOSTE::CALLANDERThu Dec 27 1990 15:2211
    Philippe,
    
    This area has definitely been discussed, from all aspects of the
    system. I know that the area of your concern is shared by many; no
    promises are being made, but work is continuing (investigation and
    discussions) in this area. As to the if and whens of see this
    implemented --- I would suggest that try sending a quick write-up of
    your requirements (and your note does a good job of it) to product
    management for incorporation into the next set of MCC product
    requirements. You can try sending them to Hakim (DELNI::) Dhilla.
     
581.3BSYBEE::EGOLFJohn C. Egolf LKG2-2/T02 x226-7874Thu Dec 27 1990 18:034
	Hakim is  no  longer  in DECmcc product management.  If anybody
	does wish to send requiremnts of product suggestions, send them
	to    Steve    Lane    (DELNI::S_LANE)    or    Randy    Covill
	(DELNI::R_COVILL).