Conference azur::mcc

554.0. "ACCVIO on enrollment of AM using T1.1.0 (EFT)" by BYBLOS::TAMER () Thu Dec 13 1990 13:14

I am unable to enroll my AM using the new kit (EFT T1.1.0). It access violates
at enrollment. No changes whatsover happened to the AM code since successful
enrollments in the IFT kit ( I recompiled and relinked again, but problem 
persists).

Here is a screen dump:
$ man/ent/debug

         VAX DEBUG Version V5.4-019

%DEBUG-I-NOGLOBALS, some or all global symbols not accessible
%DEBUG-I-INITIAL, language is C, module set to MCC_MAIN

DECmcc (T1.1.0)


TP_manager> enroll mcc_tp_am
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=00000019, PC
=00012119, PSL=03C00000
%DEBUG-I-EXITSTATUS, is '%SYSTEM-E-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, vir
tual address=0017F400, PC=B2C00404, PSL=00000000'
DBG> exit

>>>Note that It is blowing up before ever getting to my mcc_<mm>_init/
   mcc_<mm>_probe routines.

BYBLOS::sh log mcc_tp_am
   "MCC_TP_AM" = "DECTPV1:[PROTO.TAMER.EXE]MCC_TP_AM.EXE" (LNM$PROCESS_TABLE)
BYBLOS::sh log mcc_tp_am_log
   "MCC_TP_AM_LOG" = "1" (LNM$PROCESS_TABLE)

>>>The only change in the environment since IFT is that mcc_common is not in 
   sys$common:[mcc] but in a diffrent directory:

$ sh log mcc_system
   "MCC_SYSTEM" = "MCC_SPECIFIC" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
        = "MCC_COMMON"
1  "MCC_SPECIFIC" = "SYS$SPECIFIC:[MCC]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
1  "MCC_COMMON" = "SYSMGR_DSK:[MCC]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)

>>>Process parameters are >= <those recommended in the release notes>, e.g.

Maxjobs:         0  Fillm:       500  Bytlm:        50000
Maxacctjobs:     0  Shrfillm:      0  Pbytlm:           0
Maxdetach:       0  BIOlm:       100  JTquota:       1024
Prclm:          25  DIOlm:        24  WSdef:          512
Prio:            4  ASTlm:       100  WSquo:         2048
Queprio:         0  TQElm:       130  WSextent:     10000
CPU:        (none)  Enqlm:      3000  Pgflquo:      60000

>>>dispatch table protection is as follows:

$ dir mcc_system:mcc_dispatch_table.dat

Directory SYSMGR_DSK:[MCC]

MCC_DISPATCH_TABLE.DAT;1
                        450  13-DEC-1990 09:47:47.97  (RWED,RWED,RWE,RWE)



>>>I DELETED classes NODE, NODE4, BRIDGE, and STATION from the the develeopment
   dictionary, but that should have no effect I can think of, right ?

>>>All other FMs, PMs enroll successfully (as specified in MCC_ENROLL_DIR.COM)

Thanks in advance for your help in solving the puzzle. Let me know if further 
info is needed.

Phil

    Please check note 134