T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
514.1 | use of alarms procedure; will this due? | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Tue Dec 04 1990 14:27 | 18 |
| One thing I know is available now can be used by modifying your
rules to include the logging automatically. Provided with the kit
are a sampling of command procedures that can be called from the
Alarms FM every time a rule fires (or misfires). These procedures
are located in the MCC_COMMON directory. There is a procedure
explicitly for the purpose of logging, this is call
MCC_ALARMS_LOG_ALARMS.COM I believe. The user can set this up as
the action procedure to be called when a rule fires. A default log
file name is supplied (something like sys$login:mcc_alarms.log)
but the user can set up their own log file location/name as they
see fit by overriding the default.
The uses for the alarms command procedures, as well as descriptions
of the procedures that are supplied with the kit, are located in
the MCC Alarms Use manual. Note that these procedures are examples
(that do work) but that can also be customized to allow the user
to initiate multiple actions from a single rule firing.
|
514.2 | How about automatic fault detection? | PANIC::GILL | John, DTN 847-5849 | Wed Dec 05 1990 06:57 | 13 |
| Jim,
Thanks for your reply. I am quite happy that automatic logging of
faults is available once they are detected. How about automatic
detection - or to be more precise - detection of faults without having
to poll across the network for them.
For instance if a link on a remote node goes down will there be some
mechanism of 'sinking' the DECnet message to the network management
system and triggering an alarm.
JG
|
514.3 | Sorry ... No Auto Rules | WAKEME::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Alarms Team | Wed Dec 05 1990 08:03 | 43 |
| RE: .2
>> How about automatic detection - or to be more precise - detection of
>> faults without having to poll across the network for them.
Sorry, in DECmcc v1.1 there is no capability of 'Auto Rules'.
>> For instance if a link on a remote node goes down will there be some
>> mechanism of 'sinking' the DECnet message to the network management
>> system and triggering an alarm.
If there is an Event generated by DECnet when this happens .. you can
write an Alarms Rule to monitor that event. When the event occurs, the
information will be written to your log file (or mailed to you, etc...)
If there no event generated - then you can try the CHANGE_OF function. This
will pole the entity/attribute at a rate you specify, and detect changes
in the value.
-----------------------------------
Example Rule Expression for an Event:
Expression = (NODE4 WAKEME COUNTERS ZEROED)
The default time specification for an Rule on an Event is 'forever'.
ie, check this event forever, until I disable the rule.
Example Rule Expression for a Change of function:
Expression = (CHANGE_OF(NODE4 WAKEME USER BYTES SENT,*,*))
This rule will monitor the value of Node WAKEME's User Bytes Sent
Attribute...If it changes, you will be notified (by the mechanism
you select; Mail, Log file, Broadcast message, etc...). The default
time specification for a Rule on an Attribute is 'every 15 minutes.
Does this help ??
/Keith
|
514.4 | Don't forget the Keyword! | WAKEME::ANIL | | Wed Dec 05 1990 13:54 | 16 |
| >Example Rule Expression for an Event:
>
> Expression = (NODE4 WAKEME COUNTERS ZEROED)
>
> The default time specification for an Rule on an Event is 'forever'.
> ie, check this event forever, until I disable the rule.
A typo in the above expression:
The correct usage is:
Expression = (OCCURS (NODE4 WAKEME COUNTERS ZEROED))
- Anil Navkal
|
514.5 | Sorry about the Cheif ! (never did like the occurs keyword) | WAKEME::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - DECmcc Alarms Team | Wed Dec 05 1990 15:45 | 0 |
514.6 | FYI finding out event names | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Wed Dec 05 1990 15:55 | 42 |
| RE .2
Boy some times I wonder around here...more people address notes
to me as "Jim" than "Jill". I guess I should sign my notes
more often.
Anyway, did the stuff from Keith and Anil help clarify things? In
the newest (EFT) releases of the AM Use manuals you will find that
the events supported should be documented and their meanings explained.
For a quick list of the event supported you can use the FCL FORMS
mode. Do the following to get the list:
MCC> USE MODE FORMS
<forms mode comes up>
Verb: GETEVENT
Entity: <the entity class you are interested in>
Arguments: <PF2>
This will then look something like this:
Verb: getevent
Entity: node4 goste
Arguments:
Qualifiers:
List Of Valid Event IDs
Event Records Lost
Automatic Counters
Counters Zeroed
Local Node State Change
Access Control Reject
Node Cryptographic failure
Invalid Message
Invalid Flow Control
Aged Packet Loss
Any Events
You can then use the Alarms FM "occurs" function to create a rule
on any of these events.
|
514.7 | many thanks | PANIC::GILL | John, DTN 847-5849 | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:54 | 11 |
|
Thanks for all the input. I am clear now on what can/cannot be done.
My prospective customer does not know much about EMA yet and they have
said that management and ownership are key issues for them. I reckon
they will be pretty impressed with what we have on offer.
Thanks again,
JG
P.S. Sorry about getting the name wrong Jill
|
514.8 | Event Support is in DECmcc V1.1 | TOOK::MATTHEWS | | Mon Dec 10 1990 09:42 | 15 |
| V1.0 of DECmcc did not provide event support. It was an item that
we traded off for time to market. V1.1 DECmcc provides event support.
Not all AMs have implemented an event logger but the kernel has
implemented a central event log mechanism. There are a set of
Notifications Services to distribute events to users asynchronously
including alarms to the iconic map PM. The ALARMS FM supports
asynchronous events at both its AM and FM interfaces. The DNA4
AM provides events for V1.1. What is missing is events for DNA5
(mostly because we have no real DNA5 event objects to test against),
SNMP, etc. Bridges do not generate events so there is no event
support in the Bridge AM.
I hope this answers your concerns.
wally
|
514.9 | Automatic fault isolation and/or recovery tools | QUIVER::HAROKOPUS | | Thu Jul 11 1991 10:38 | 9 |
|
I am working on requirements for automated network fault isolation and
recovery techniques for a smart hub project. I am interested in finding
out what work has been done in these areas either inside or outside of mcc.
If there is somewhere else where I should inquire please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Bob
|