T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
445.1 | half way there. | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Tue Nov 20 1990 12:41 | 20 |
| We are working on the internationalization issues all of the time.
We started this effort with the text. MCC attempts (and some time
in the future wants to be complete in this area) to store all text
external to the code. This is done using message files and the
dictionary files. If the text of the Management Specifications (input
files for the dictionary) and the message files are translated to
another language that is half the battle.
The other half that we are still working on are things like the
different ways in which numeric values, dates, and times are displayed
and input; as well as the difference in text characters (accents
and the such) and their input (right to left versus left to right...).
There is still a long way to go to be a completely internationalizable
product without requiring some edit work and relink, but the message
files for all of the tools and MCC proper, along with the Management
Specifications is a good start.
jill
|
445.2 | I18N, plans and strategy | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | Arctophile by Accident | Fri May 03 1991 18:11 | 20 |
|
Our group (DECtp) is using MCC as the director, and the first release
of our product will support the Kanji and Katakana character sets.
Aside from translating, (called localization) we also would like to see
international support for data representation of locale-specific
information (such as date/time, numeric separators, etc...). But most
important, we would like to see support for MOCS or Unicode character
sets (and the resulting issues such as collation).
We have no "requirement" that directives and entity class names be
represented in Kanji, but in order to be a competitive product, that
would be a big plus.
Any comments on the state of internationalization and MCC?
Marc
order to handle Kanji.
|
445.3 | any more progress in this area? | SKIGOD::PFROMER | Pfroamin' at the mouth... | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:20 | 13 |
|
Has there been any more progress in this area?
The product I'm working on will provide an MCC compliant generic interface
to various media loader robots. We plan to allow 3rd parties to develop
"media robot drivers" (code which manifests a particular robot) that will
plug into a "media robot server" MOM provided by DEC. A problem I have is
how to allow the 3rd party developer to specify additional robot specific
error messages WITHOUT having to coordinate his/her product release with
our product release.
Any ideas?
|
445.4 | Internationalization will have to wait | TOOK::CALLANDER | MCC = My Constant Companion | Wed Oct 23 1991 20:28 | 8 |
| Right now we are very busy trying to get V1.2 out to field test.
No major investigations are going on into any of these areas at
this time. To do many of the things you are requesting (like
language specific value formats) will require coding changes.
One of the changes we would like to make is to provide a mechanism
where you could enroll routines for datatype conversions directly into
the kernel system ,so you could modify the interpretation of data on
input and output without having to modify the base system.
|