| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 408.1 | which specification? | TOOK::DENSMORE | Dirty deeds done dirt cheap | Mon Oct 15 1990 13:43 | 10 |
| Are you referring to the MS files? If so, I can send you a copy of one
of the Phase V MS files. You can use it as a template.
If you are referring to the Module Reference Manuals (MRMs), you need
to contact Bob Merrifield (TOOK:MERRIFIELD).
If you are referring to architecture specs, maybe Mark Sylor or one of
the architects can supply a suggestion.
Mike
|
| 408.2 | tried the LSE .env? | FORTY2::MELLING | Chris Melling @REO. 830-4528 | Tue Oct 16 1990 07:20 | 5 |
| If you are referring to the MS (or MSL) files, then there is an LSE language
template in the toolkit kit (!). This makes the writing of the MS files a
lot less arduous.
Chris
|
| 408.3 | I'll give it a go.... thanks! | SIEVAX::MIDONA | Alan Midona, SIE Reading, DTN 830 3996 | Tue Oct 16 1990 12:45 | 0 |
| 408.4 | MS vs MRM | TOOK::DENSMORE | Dirty deeds done dirt cheap | Tue Oct 16 1990 15:48 | 12 |
| Alan (.0) and I "conversed" off line via mail. The specifications that
he refers to in .0 are "Module Reference Manuals". These are "prose"
descriptions of the services offered/required by a management module.
The MSL (or MS) specifications are compilable descriptions of these
same services. The former are put together under LaTeX using special
style macros. There are no templates as such but one can get the
source for something like the Sample AM and work from there. The
latter, as mentioned in .-2, have LSE templates. You MUST have an MS
specification. The Reference Manual is..., well let me just say that I
don't consider them to be the best part of my job and leave it at that.
Mike
|