| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
The filtering of the "WITH" qualifier appears to work incorrectly with a SET
directive. Here is the scenario:
MCC> show server bill min proc, max proc
server TPEDNS_NS:.server.bill
Characteristics
AT 2-OCT-1990 11:03:49
Minimum Processes = 2
Maximum Processes = 50
MCC> show server phil min proc, max proc
server TPEDNS_NS:.server.phil
Characteristics
AT 2-OCT-1990 11:04:40
Minimum Processes = 0
Maximum Processes = 50
***The following directive is intended to set Maximum Processes to 99 for any
server with Minimum Processes = 2 ***
MCC> set server * max proc=99, with (min proc = 2)
server TPEDNS_NS:.server.bill
Characteristics
AT 2-OCT-1990 11:06:29
Modification of the specified attributes completed successfully
MCC> show server bill min proc, max proc
server TPEDNS_NS:.server.bill
Characteristics
AT 2-OCT-1990 11:06:58
Minimum Processes = 2
Maximum Processes = 99
***The MAX Proc attribute of this server "phil" should not have been set, but
it was.***
MCC> show server phil min proc, max proc
server TPEDNS_NS:.server.phil
Characteristics
AT 2-OCT-1990 11:07:02
Minimum Processes = 0
Maximum Processes = 99
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 372.1 | will be qared | TOOK::HAO | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:56 | 19 | |
You're right. The FCL does not handle WITH correctly on any command
other than Show and maybe Directory. The current logic in the FCL code
that does the WITH processing only handles filtering on the output.
Here's the specifics:
- FCL makes the mcc_call for user command
- checks if WITH has been specified; if so, makes
the mcc_call to get data for attribute specified
in WITH clause
- decides whether to display user command based on whether
the WITH clause evaluates to true or false
The goal is certainly to handle WITH on any type of command. I will
qar this against the FCL.
By the way, the user manual correctly describes how it should be
working. We're just not there yet.
Christine
| |||||