Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Does anyone have any feel for what sort of load DECmcc would place on a larger VAX when used as a DECwindows client? I've read the white paper on VT1000 Performance regarding X applications by Steve Bennett. I believe he lists a table of the approximate number of VT1000 users that would be reasonable on various system types for a DECwrite application. Does anyone have a feel for how MCC compares to a DECwrite application with regard to CPU loading? If this turns out to be a rather sizeable resource hog, it would be good to know so that when a customer asks if MCC can/should be run on their large system or member of a cluster, we could recommend for or against such use, preferring to keep the application on a workstation. Along these lines, when you run MCC as a window client, how does this effect licensing? Does the license cost change based on the number of users that can access a client, or any client for that matter? Any help appreciated. Al
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.1 | INFO - not yet available | GOSTE::CALLANDER | Wed Mar 21 1990 17:38 | 19 | |
That's a lot of questions. I will attempt to address the easy ones and leave things like pricing and licensing to some one else. Right now the Iconic Map PM is not yet in external field test. Until that time our local systems (the big ones) won't install it, so we haven't run the type of tests and generated estimates on performance and load yet. We have had a number of requests along these lines for MCC in general and are working on enhancing performance as well as getting some concrete benchmarks for the current performance. When more information is known/available it will be published. One thing to remember with MCC, different from applications like DECwrite, is that depending upon what you are doing your load can drastically differ. An example would be if you set up a large number of alarms running while at the same time started doing a lot of intensive work from the user interface as will (like processing all attributes for all entities in a bridges forwarding database). |