T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
37.1 | Help is on the way... | ALLZS::MORRISON | The Network IS the System | Mon Jan 08 1990 09:07 | 7 |
| I'm working on the program to assist in the importation of RBMS data into
MCC "even as we speak". It's not done yet, but if the necessary support is
added to the rest of MCC (bridge name support), then it should be ready by
external field test. The program will create a .COM file which is a series
of MCC commands to reproduce the information from the RBMS database(s).
Wayne
|
37.2 | | CCIIS1::ROGGEBAND | _ �hili��e _ | Thu Feb 01 1990 11:01 | 14 |
|
Wayne,
� MCC "even as we speak". It's not done yet, but if the necessary support is
� added to the rest of MCC (bridge name support), then it should be ready by
Is the non-support of bridge names the reason why I cannot register
my bridges? I tried the following command :
MCC>REGISTER BRIDGE TOTO 08-00-2B-08-54-FF
and get an "invalid entity identifier" message.
�hR.
|
37.3 | Yep, No Name=No Register. | CHRISB::BRIENEN | Christopher J. Brienen | Thu Feb 01 1990 11:39 | 19 |
| RE: Note 37.2
> Is the non-support of bridge names the reason why I cannot register
> my bridges?
Yes, this is part of the reason (problems in other pieces of MCC
also prevented bridge NAME support in IFT).
> I tried the following command :
> MCC>REGISTER BRIDGE TOTO 08-00-2B-08-54-FF
The proper syntax for registering a bridge will be :
MCC>REGISTER BRIDGE name ADDRESS={address[,address]}
as in: REGISTER BRIDGE TOTO ADDRESS={08-00-2B-08-54-FF}
Hope this helps.
|
37.4 | | CCIIS1::ROGGEBAND | _ �hili��e _ | Fri Feb 02 1990 09:24 | 10 |
| > The proper syntax for registering a bridge will be :
>
> MCC>REGISTER BRIDGE name ADDRESS={address[,address]}
>
> as in: REGISTER BRIDGE TOTO ADDRESS={08-00-2B-08-54-FF}
This syntax does make more sense. I just followed what is in the
documentation (pages 2-4 & 2-5 of the "Bridge AM Module Use").
�hR
|
37.5 | REGISTER Syntax Changing | CHRISB::BRIENEN | Christopher J. Brienen | Thu Apr 19 1990 18:10 | 21 |
| A change in the Register syntax is being made for the EFT Update
version of DECmcc.
The datatype for the ADDRESS argument is changing from SET OF ID802
to ID802. --------
What this means:
1) No curly braces will be required around the Bridge Address
(e.g. REGISTER BRIDGE TOTO ADDRESS=08-00-2B-08-54-FF)
2) Only one address can be specified (Bridge AM will acquire any
others automatically from the target bridge)
3) Register directive's ADDRESS argument datatype will match that
of STATION
Note that the Address Identifier attribute's datatype will remain
(as planned, not as implemented in EFT) SET OF ID802.
Chris
|
37.6 | are curly braces allowed? | DSTEG::HUGHES | | Fri Apr 20 1990 09:40 | 8 |
| Chris,
Your last note said that no curly braces will be required around
the bridge address on a register. Will they be allowed? or will I have
to change all my test scripts again?
Linda
|
37.7 | Nope. Not allowed. | CHRISB::BRIENEN | Christopher J. Brienen | Fri Apr 20 1990 10:15 | 8 |
| Sorry, but they will not be allowed.
It should be fairly straightforward to write a procedure that would
modify all of your REGISTER BRIDGE commands to remove the curly
braces...
BTW, have you considered the impact of the DECmcc command syntax
change on your scripts (i.e. MCC -> MANAGE/ENTERPRISE...)
|
37.8 | should work | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Fri Apr 20 1990 10:47 | 5 |
|
Should work, tell me if it doesn't.
jill
|
37.9 | sorry, not allowed | TOOK::HAO | | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:46 | 7 |
| Linda,
the curly braces aren't allowed. Jill mistakenly thought you were
talking about entity identifier.
Christine
|
37.10 | mcc vs manage/enterprise | DSTEG::HUGHES | | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:57 | 7 |
| re .7
As for the change from MCC to Manage/enterprise, we haven't done
anything because it works both ways. Is that going to change?
Linda
|
37.11 | old cld going away | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Sun Apr 22 1990 17:44 | 7 |
|
Yes it is going away with EFT update.
jill
(If you have a concern in this area please send mail to Peter
Savage, TOOK::P_SAVAGE.)
|