T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
9.1 | | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Fri Nov 10 1989 07:33 | 5 |
| I don't understand the N/A fields in the input column. Surely all values
which can be output have to be able to be input to allow for entity filters
(the NCL WITH clause). Isn't that the case?
Graham
|
9.2 | INFO- clarification | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Tue Nov 14 1989 08:41 | 16 |
|
Sorry for any confusion that the list might have caused. For the
T1.0 release we were unable to complete support of all the data
types specified by the System Reference Manual. For this reason
we prioritized the data types and attempted to complete those that
we felt would be used most frequently. So that all commands could
at least get data back via a reply we always print the data, even
if we have to dump it in hex.
The chart shows which data types are supported on input and output.
With the release of the field test update almost all data types
are supported. The exceptions are those data types that require
DNS support, these will not be available until the internal field
test end user kit scheduled for release in mid december.
|
9.3 | INFO - not all data types support an input BNF | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Wed Nov 15 1989 13:03 | 10 |
|
In rereading 9.1 I noticed that 9.2 doesn't really answer the question.
Certain data types, like MCCReply, do not support an input mechanism.
To see which data types do not support the use of the data type
for the input of attribute/argument values please refer to the Data
Types chapter (9) in the SRM. If an input BNF is not supplied then
there is no mechanism for using the data type on an input argument.
|
9.4 | | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Fri Nov 17 1989 16:33 | 4 |
| I don't have my copy of the SRM to hand but I would have thought that
Implementation and Component had to be enterable for filters.
Graham
|
9.5 | CLARIFICATION | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Mon Nov 20 1989 14:22 | 24 |
|
I see the confusion with my choice of examples. Within the MCCReply
data type there are many fields, two of them being the implementation
and component information. These fields in the MCCReply have to
do with the component that diagnosed the problem and created the
MCCReply that is being returned.
The implementation and component fields are not settable using the
MCCReply, but if defined in the components management specification as
settable attributes they can be entered using the SET directive, in
which case they will be encoded using the data type defined for the
attribute. As far as the use of the component and implementation as
filters, this can be done only if the component name and implementation
are defined in the management specification as attributes, if they are
then a filter can be defined using the WITH clause on the input command
line.
As it stands right now the MCCReply is a specialized record format
with predefined fields that have specific encoding and decoding
rules and meanings. This data type was defined for output of certain
types of error conditions within MCC, it was not designed for input
usage.
|