T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
12.1 | URL to DTC White Paper | A1VAX::GILFIX | | Tue Jan 14 1997 17:44 | 4 |
| For additional information, see the ObjectBroker Desktop Connection
White Paper at
http://www.digital.com/info/objectbroker/product/obwp_desk.htm#top_page
|
12.2 | How does licensing work for developers? | CFSCTC::HUSTON | Steve Huston | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:58 | 9 |
| Is DTC a developer-type product? Do applications built using DTC
require a run-time piece to be distributed with the application? How
does the licensing work if there is a "developer" and a "run-time" piece?
From the price ($500 a piece in quantity 10) I'm guessing that developers
pay the license and distribute the app (or ActiveX control, etc.) without
further licensing by the user.
-Steve
|
12.3 | | SEND::STORM | | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:49 | 12 |
| I've forwarded this note to Dan Gilfix, our product manager, to
addressing. He has been out of the office.
The licenses is required for all systems. We don't differentiate
between a Development use and a runtime use.
Dan can provide more info about how he came up with that price, but
my understanding is that this is less than what our competitor (IONA)
charges for their similar product.
Mark,
|
12.4 | DTC priced competitive AND SOME! | BOSEPM::GILFIX | | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:00 | 26 |
| Right you are, Mark. I just got back in the office.
DTC does not differentiate between development, runtime, client, or
server license. We are licensing DTC in a very very simple manner: one
price, one PC-style (a la Microsoft) license per desktop. Since DTC
only runs on Win-32, we're only talking about Win95 and Windows NT
(both Intel and Alpha).
I wouldn't use $500 as the baseline price. Our "sweet spot" is $9995
for 50 licenses, which is less than $200 per copy. We're hoping
customers will think twice about paying $5000 for 10 when for another
$5K they receive five times that amount.
As far as competitive positioning is concerned, ObjectBroker Desktop
Connection is significantly undercutting our chief competitor, Iona
Technologies, as well as other vendors like HP. Both vendors package
their inferior OLE Automation-CORBA bridge in their development kit.
This means that every PC wanting access to remote CORBA objects needs
to spend $2500. Even at $500 per copy, ObjectBroker Desktop Connection
is a bargain. What's more, DTC users can do substantially more coding
with these objects than Iona or HP users (see Mark's competitive
write-up.)
Some of our prospective customers are considering deployments well in
access of 50 PC seats. Needless to say, we've got aggressive volume
discounts which kick-in beyond the 50-pack, making DTC extremely
attractive both technically and from an ROI perspective.
|
12.5 | | OSAV03::NOSE | Tooru Nosse, Japan West PSC/OS2 | Thu Jan 30 1997 22:19 | 9 |
| Hi, all.
As packaging haven't been written well yet, I have a question.
DTC is the bridge to OBB, right? So does DTC bundle all or limited
pieces of OBB needed for DTC?
Or do customer have to buy OBB separately? Then pricing story will
be different...
Tooru
|
12.5 | Makes sense for in-house developer market | CFSCTC::HUSTON | Steve Huston | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:28 | 23 |
| Ok, so you're going for sites who you can entice to buy a large number of
licenses at once. Like the in-house corporate developer type. Makes perfect
sense for that.
For me, who's more of a third-party developer who might write apps for sale,
and not in-house use, it is tough. I now have to decide a few things:
1. Will my customers pay up $500 more than I would normally charge them, so
I can include a DTC license?
2. If 1 is 'no', do I believe that I can safely buy, 50, or 500 DTC licenses
up front to reduce the add-on cost? Can I come up with $10,000 or $20,000
up front to allow me to cut the cost?
3. Do I want to architect using some other technology?
I can understand that you're not primarily after this developer market, and I
can understand why. But if you do decide to pursue that market, I would be
a potential customer, and the above is what I'd be thinking.
FWIW,
-Steve
|