T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
18.1 | | AXEL::FOLEY | http://axel.zko.dec.com | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:13 | 8 |
18.2 | Different things look good at different times. | WAYLAY::GORDON | Resident Lightning Designer | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:30 | 6 |
18.3 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:13 | 4 |
18.4 | the Truth... | ABACUS::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Mon Jan 13 1997 16:41 | 8 |
18.5 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:19 | 5 |
18.6 | | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Tue Jan 14 1997 08:59 | 5 |
18.7 | What about height?? | ABACUS::MALSON | | Tue Jan 14 1997 12:30 | 22 |
18.8 | Imagine! | BRAT::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Tue Jan 14 1997 13:07 | 11 |
18.9 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Tue Jan 14 1997 13:13 | 6 |
18.10 | | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Tue Jan 14 1997 14:59 | 19 |
18.11 | sorry ;*( | BRAT::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Tue Jan 14 1997 15:12 | 6 |
18.12 | | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Tue Jan 14 1997 15:18 | 10 |
18.13 | Height *DOES* matter... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:42 | 49 |
18.14 | We tend to be more flexible as we age | WRKSYS::BROWER | | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:53 | 17 |
18.15 | my .02 | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:03 | 16 |
18.16 | Hope for the vertically challenged: | DANGER::ARRIGHI | Life is an else-if construct | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:24 | 17 |
18.17 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:24 | 5 |
18.18 | watch out I can sneak up on you when... | ABACUS::MALSON | | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:11 | 52 |
18.19 | how about a lighweight guy with a heavier woman or vis versa? | WRKSYS::BROWER | | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:15 | 9 |
18.20 | | BOOKIE::KENYON | | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:36 | 14 |
18.21 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:40 | 8 |
18.22 | Oh no! You mean it's just me?! | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Thu Jan 16 1997 10:34 | 24 |
18.23 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Thu Jan 16 1997 10:36 | 6 |
18.24 | | TUXEDO::BAKER | | Thu Jan 16 1997 13:20 | 26 |
18.25 | | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Thu Jan 16 1997 13:25 | 11 |
18.26 | what difference??? | ABACUS::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Thu Jan 16 1997 14:49 | 10 |
18.27 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Thu Jan 16 1997 15:14 | 7 |
18.28 | height never phased me | WRKSYS::BROWER | | Thu Jan 16 1997 15:36 | 8 |
18.29 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jan 17 1997 08:11 | 7 |
18.30 | Gee Ollie.... | TBC001::DROVER | HEDGEHOG | Fri Jan 17 1997 09:58 | 4 |
18.31 | | AXEL::FOLEY | http://axel.zko.dec.com | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:02 | 15 |
18.32 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:13 | 5 |
18.33 | new club for men... | ABACUS::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:31 | 14 |
18.34 | | CBROWN::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:33 | 4 |
18.35 | sorry %^) mike | ABACUS::DELBALSO | they call me Teasha | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:40 | 7 |
18.36 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jan 17 1997 12:40 | 5 |
18.37 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Fri Jan 17 1997 12:55 | 3 |
18.38 | | AXEL::FOLEY | http://axel.zko.dec.com | Fri Jan 17 1997 15:02 | 9 |
18.39 | Hey medium man.... | ABACUS::MALSON | | Mon Jan 20 1997 12:42 | 27 |
18.40 | Oh Daryll :-P | PCBUOA::DEWITT | running on fire and dreams... | Mon Jan 20 1997 12:44 | 5 |
18.41 | Will try harder now. | SALEM::DODA | One World within.... | Mon Jan 20 1997 12:57 | 5 |
18.42 | ;') | ABACUS::MALSON | | Mon Jan 20 1997 13:17 | 6 |
18.43 | I am not a number... | ipl31.zko.dec.com::LARU | au contraire... | Wed Jan 22 1997 11:23 | 36 |
18.44 | Just my opinion ... | HAZMAT::WEIER | | Wed Jan 22 1997 12:44 | 34 |
18.45 | but I heard jokers are wild!!!!!! | ABACUS::MALSON | | Wed Jan 22 1997 12:59 | 17 |
18.46 | Another viewpoint ;-) | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Tue Feb 18 1997 12:51 | 20 |
| <from note 46>
On the role of beauty and handsomeness in love:
> "If you want to be loved by somebody who isn't already in
> your family, it doesn't hurt to be beautiful." Anita C.,
> age 8
> "It isn't always just how you look. Look at me. I'm
> handsome like anything and I haven't got anybody to
> marry me yet." Brian, age 7
> "Beauty is skin deep. But how rich you are can last a long
> time." Christine, age 9
;-)
B
|
18.47 | Weak in the knees | WRKSYS::BROWER | Pokey Smurf | Thu Apr 10 1997 09:25 | 26 |
| This note has been idle for awhile... I think Carol had a very
good question. ie: what makes you weak in the knees.
Obviously a drop dead gorgeous woman ;-)
But beyond looks I think really connecting with someone and
feeling "WOW I feel like I've know this person my whole life!"
Wel I suppose that gives you those wonderful butterflies as well
as weakness in the knees.
Getting a rose or card from anonymous. Hey mystery and intrigue
make this guy weak kneed.
Sometimes just being noticed by someone.. I had an instance in the
coffee line in the cafe. Where an attractive woman gave me the up and
down 2 or 3 times then had a devilish grin on her face.. Hmm weak knees
and a bit of a blush from me.. I don't consider myself overly
handsome.. Which is probably why I clown around in here so much. Gotta
do somethin to mask that bit of insecurity..
Weak in the knees.. The first time you gently reach over and
attempt to hold hands and she gives you a shy smile.. Ahh I better
stop I'm giving myself butterflies....
bb
|
18.48 | look at this | FABSIX::L_VALLONE | | Sun Apr 13 1997 06:13 | 7 |
| The "YOU MAKE ME HOT, LOOK'S" eventually get old. when you are with
someone for a length of time the VISUAL INFATUATION DOES WARE OFF!!!!!
any one who say's no is full of horse shi*
What really matters is friction and timing
leon
|
18.49 | Oh, I don't know about that..... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Mon Apr 14 1997 11:41 | 11 |
| Well, I'll jump in and argue that one in .-1. How long does it take
to wear off, Leon? My first wife and I grew apart, but I never stopped
thinking she was attractive. I *still* think she's an attractive woman.
I've been with my second wife now for almost 3 years, and I think she
looks hotter every time I look at her. She worries about her age and
her weight, and I don't know what she's worrying about because she just
looks better to me all the time. I think when the strong emotional and
loving bond is there between two people, then the physical attraction
is not only there but goes well beyond your short-lived infatuations.
I'll report back in 15-20 years and let you know if I still feel that
way.
|
18.50 | big hot button for me... | WHYNOW::KENYON | | Mon Apr 14 1997 13:58 | 12 |
| This is a real hot button for me...
I was married for 11 years and my ex divorced me because he felt I was
"too fat" ... for him the relationship was over 6 years before he ended
it by taking up with someone else, 5'2" and petite..
so, it happens, and it hurts...
If the visual is all you base your attraction on, then the relationship
will end... there is so much more to love than sex...
|
18.51 | AGreed Kathleen | WRKSYS::BROWER | Pokey Smurf | Mon Apr 14 1997 14:11 | 4 |
| I agree 100% Kathleen. Anyone so hung up on looks is being
awfully shallow.
bb
|
18.52 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | hold me while I dream... | Mon Apr 14 1997 14:35 | 12 |
| Big difference between "in fatuation" and "in love" to me anyway,
the "infatuation" is usually physical only (very good looking person)
the "in love" is when there's physical and emotional chemistry...
Yeah we're all attracted to great looking people, but if there's
nothing inside, it fades (or you're really shallow and appearance is
all that matters).
When you're "in love" they're spendid even when their hair is in 12
directions :-)
joyce
|
18.53 | Beauty only skin deep | WRKSYS::BROWER | Pokey Smurf | Mon Apr 14 1997 14:56 | 10 |
| Or even when their hair all falls out ;-)
On the weight thing... I've had times when I felt I've been
shunned by other women because I'm slender.. Or becuase I'm bald.
Certainly neither thing is directly under my control. I suppose if
I stopped running and otherwise working out I'd maybe put on 10-15
pounds... But it does feel good to be in shape..
bb
|
18.54 | | DANGER::ARRIGHI | and miles to go before I sleep | Mon Apr 14 1997 15:42 | 24 |
|
>>If the visual is all you base your attraction on, then the relationship
>>will end... there is so much more to love than sex...
Agreed, but let me put a different spin on this, while being careful
not to say anything that I don't really mean:
There are almost as many different kinds of sex as there are different
kinds of love (or ways to prepare shrimp, if you're a Gump fan). I
think that a fundamental problem is equating certain visual cues with
the expectation of great sex. Sex can be a very big part of a
relationship without invalidating the relationship, if the participants
have realistic expectations. If I expect that the only great sex I'll
ever have is with someone who looks like Kim Basinger, then I'll likely
be self-limited and disappointed.
And from the other side of the gender gap: Back when I was more
in-shape than I am now, the lady I was with always made me feel like
she was doing me a favor. After acquiring the body I currently occupy,
I was with a lady who always made me feel like she considered me a
valued gift. It was a LOT of fun doing what I could to live up to
that. :-)
Tony
|
18.55 | think about this... | ABACUS::DELBALSO | she'll make her way | Mon Apr 14 1997 16:31 | 6 |
|
Do any of you feel that caring more about a person seems to make that
person more attractive in your eyes?
???
|
18.56 | been there... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Mon Apr 14 1997 16:50 | 17 |
| Absolutely Jan! I've always said that! It also makes you
care less and less how they would appear in someone else's
eyes, too...and sometimes even more.
I remember one man I was with for a long time. Not the best
looking man you've seen, believe me. But there was something
about him that just grabbed me. And I'll be real honest, for
a while I found myself thinking I was the only one who could
see it. I felt I wouldn't have to be jealous when he was "out
and about".
The more I cared about him, the more I worried that *anyone* could
see and feel the same way and I did not feel quite so secure. Now
I see that my own thought process was shallow even as I didn't care
that he was homely.
cj *->
|
18.57 | | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Mon Apr 14 1997 16:52 | 18 |
| definitely... we've all been conditioned to accept external,
arbitrary, culturally defined standards of "beauty." As we come
to know a persons, our internal filters open up, and we start
seeing the other more as they truly are...
and it works both ways... people who [believe] that they don't
meet the external standards very often tighten up physically,
so that they exude pain and stress... as they begin to feel
comfortable, and loved, they tend to loosen up and let their
natural beauty shine through... I noticed this when I was
taking pictures... there are some people who know that they
just "take lousy pictures," so whenever a camera was around,
they freeze up and guess what? they take a lousy picture...
If I could just get them to trust me, to feel comfortable with
me, I could get a much better picture, that they were much more
likely to feel comfortable with...
/bruce
|
18.58 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | hold me while I dream... | Mon Apr 14 1997 17:00 | 6 |
| So Bruce are you coming to Barb's party to take the next set of
singles_chat party pictures? :-)
I agree, the longer you know someone the more attractive they get.
joyce
|
18.59 | good notes Jan and cj | WRKSYS::BROWER | Pokey Smurf | Mon Apr 14 1997 17:22 | 6 |
| re:55 Why of course Jan.. When you truly care about someone as cj
put so well you see things in them that other people don't see. Also
when you're really in love not just lusting after somone I think you
exude an air of self confidence that makes you more attractive.
bb
|
18.60 | | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Tue Apr 15 1997 09:11 | 7 |
| � So Bruce are you coming to Barb's party to take the next set of
� singles_chat party pictures? :-)
I may actually be able to make this gathering...
but I'm not doing any photography right now...
/b
|
18.61 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | hold me while I dream... | Tue Apr 15 1997 13:25 | 3 |
| S'ok - I'm sure Barb still has her camera...
joyce
|
18.62 | | FABSIX::L_VALLONE | | Sun Apr 27 1997 01:11 | 19 |
|
After some thought I am replying to 18.49,50,51.
The three of you have got allot of "balls" pointing a finger and labeling
me a person who "has short lived infatuations(.49),If the visual is
all you base your attraction on the relationship will end.(.50)"
and that I am a person who bases relationships on look's and sex.
I believe you read allot more into my comment and it was taken out of
context. As for my thought's,feelings and attractions they are mine and
I will not be judged by you!!! YOU DON'T KNOW A THING ABOUT ME
As for note 18.50 "I agree Kathaleen anyone so hung up on looks is
being awfully shallow"
pokey smurf, if you must must make a observation/comment directed
at me I suggest you get off of kathaleen's coat tale and do it!
love Leon
|
18.63 | | PCBUOA::DEWITT | chasing rainbows... | Sun Apr 27 1997 08:58 | 4 |
| In .48 Leon said the same thing so many of us has said - it isn't
what you look like - its who you are and the chemistry between you...
joyce
|
18.64 | | BOOKIE::KENYON | what about awe and wonder? | Mon Apr 28 1997 08:29 | 14 |
|
Hi Leon,
I wasn't commenting on you as a person. I was commenting on what you
said. Yeah, people do change physically, but if the relationship
is what it should be, then it won't matter.
What you said and how you said it just hit too close to home for me.
Like I said "this is a big hot button for me"...
Kathleen
|
18.65 | Hmm my response was based on Kathleen's reply | WRKSYS::BROWER | Pokey Smurf | Mon Apr 28 1997 09:48 | 12 |
| Hey Leon,,
I also wasn't commenting directly to you either.. You've taken what
you felt was directed at you out of context.. Fact is my response
was based purely on Kathleen's note.. So I guess I was riding on her
coatails not realizing she may or may not have been responding to
another note??
We've all had ahem if I might use the word relationships based at
first purely on lust..As I've grown older though I tend to be more
of the type that's more concerned with what's inside.
Bob
|
18.66 | Violent agreement? | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Mon Apr 28 1997 13:49 | 10 |
| I think we all latched on to different things we said, and some
taken out of context, and ended up in violent agreement. Hey, it's the
DEC way. I originally focused on a line from Leon's note about how the
physical attraction part of a relationship will wear off. What he was
trying to say, I now believe, is that if you're talking strictly
infatuation and that's all there is, it'll eventually wear off, and
you'll have nothing. I thought he was saying that the physical
attraction part of *any* relationship wears off eventually and argued
that point. So, Leon, I think you can calm down now. I think we all
agree.
|