[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vaxcat::ef97

Title:EF97:A place for the mass debater
Notice:We're DOOMED! We're all DOOMED"our tea?
Moderator:VAXCAT::LAURIEN
Created:Thu Dec 05 1996
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:45
Total number of notes:3786

38.0. "UK General Election Note#" by MOVIES::POTTER (http://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/) Mon Mar 17 1997 13:41

That nice Mr Major has confirmed that the UK general election will be on 1st 
May.

So here's a note to discuss this exciting election.

regards,
//alan
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
38.1IJSAPL::ANDERSONAll that sheep tupping worked!Mon Mar 17 1997 14:084
    "A general election? Oh goody!" said the Chinaman as he entered the
    orgy.

    Jamie.
38.2VAXCAT::LAURIEDesktop Consultant, Project EnterpriseMon Mar 17 1997 16:004
    I fear the worst, I expect the worst, but I suspect Mr. Blair's majority
    will be less than 10.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
38.3who do I vote for ?COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceTue Mar 18 1997 10:3722
    I'm confussed, they're all so similar.  
    
    Here are my needs/wishes, now who should I vote for ?
    
    1) Improved NHS (And more funding for other services).
    2) Better schools/education (Better grants fro students, even the great
       unwashed get more funding then students).
    3) Similar or (even better) lower interest rates.
    4) Similar or (even better) lower tax.
    5) No motorway tolls (WTF do they do with Road Tax ?)
    6) Better, highly available public transport with no penalties for
       private car users who choose not to you public transport.
    7) No more lies.  (Tall order this one).
    
    The list probably goes on, but on the Tory record I think they will
    probably mess the above points up totally and labour will probably have
    a good go at screwing us, so who do I vote ?
    
    Cheers,
    
    Chris
     
38.445080::CWINPENNYTue Mar 18 1997 14:3316
    
    Well, it's in the bag for Labour, they've got The Sun on their side. A
    phrase involving rats and sinking ships comes to mind.
    
    One Tory MP commented that the minds of people won't be made by what
    they read in a newspaper however he was obviously overlooking two
    critical points. One that Sun readers can't and second that even if
    they could it would tax what little mind that they have to get past
    page 3. Seeing as that nice Mr.Murdoch has a big interest in satellite
    TV no doubt he'll get his views over to the great unwashed one way or
    another.
    
    Re: .3, Chris, if you have to ask who to vote for you'd better vote
    Liberal or whatever they are called these days.
    
    Chris
38.5COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceTue Mar 18 1997 15:031
    Liberal, what colour are they then ;-)
38.6CHEFS::UKARCHIVINGMaster of cracked foot style.Tue Mar 18 1997 15:395
    Hoorah, I shall be in San Francisco on May 1st, with any luck, the most
    I'll be aware of the election is when they announce the result on the
    nightly news just after the amusingly shaped potato item.
    
    Richard 
38.745862::DODDTue Mar 18 1997 16:228
    Will Mr Potter be spoiling his ballot again?
    
    Just so I can look completely silly on May 2nd...
    
    I predict no absolute majority. The Tories form a coalition government
    and another election within the year.
    
    Andrew
38.8MOVIES::POTTERhttp://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/Tue Mar 18 1997 22:3737
    Will Mr Potter be spoiling his ballot again?
    
Well, let's look at the options:

Labour.  I simply have no idea what they really stand for.  It's true that Blair
has ripped apart most of the things that I most loathed about the labour party
(eg nationalisation commitments, indebtedness to trades unions, insane fiscal
policy, etc).  But I look at local councils which shut schools and give money to
women's organisations, which raise council tax while sending the councillors on
fact-finding junkets worldwide, and I baulk at the thought of voting for them.

Tories.  The party I would naturally support.  I think that they are probably
the most competent on the economy, but they have been in power too long, and are
getting arrogant.  The way the government screwed Rosyth to give a major
contract to a shipyard in Devon which patently could not do the job, is simply
obscene and I would punish them for that.  So I won't vote for them.

LibDems.  The only national party left that appears to be left-wing.  I don`t
like their federal policy, trying to add an extra tier of government.  I pay
enough to keep governments going already, I don`t want more government.  I also
find their anti-car rants immensely annoying.

ScotNats.  No, sorry - I don't believe that people half a mile north of the
border are different from those half a mile south.  I want fewer borders, not
more.  So even leaving aside their brain-dead socialism, I just hate the idea of
nationalism.

That's the options, and there's none that appeals.  If I still lived in
Bannockburn, I would probably vote for Michael Forsyth.  I know he's pretty
right-wing, but he fights hard for Scotland in general and his constituents in
particular.  But now I live in Falkirk East, and that is _not_ a marginal
consitituency.

I think I shall be spoiling my paper again.

regards,
//alan
38.9VAXCAT::LAURIEDesktop Consultant, Project EnterpriseWed Mar 19 1997 09:4612
    RE: .7
    
    I vacillate between your position, Mr. Dodd, and the one I expressed
    earlier.
    
    RE: .8
    
    That sort of sums it up for me. It's a poor old do. Luckily, I forgot
    to send my ex-pat voting form back last October, and so can't vote this
    year. I do live in a marginal seat.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
38.10IJSAPL::ANDERSONAll that sheep tupping worked!Wed Mar 19 1997 10:2411
    With the Tory Party running somewhere between 22% and 28%, depending on
    which way the wind is blowing, behind the Labour party, and the fact
    that most people are sick to death of Tory policies, I can't really see
    that they have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.

    As to the Sun switching sides. It has been noticed in the past that
    Rupert Murdoch likes to back winners and then brag about it. In any
    event I doubt if anyone reads the Sun to form political opinions.

    Jamie.
                                                          
38.1145862::HILTONSave Water, drink beerWed Mar 19 1997 11:094
    Problem is spoiling your vote, means someone's going to get in, and it
    maybe the party you really don't want! So you'd best vote for someone!
    
    Greg
38.12CHEFS::7A1_GRNA hangover is the wrath of grapesWed Mar 19 1997 11:3714
    Re. 11
    
    I must say that I agree.  Personally, I think they are all a bunch of
    complete morons and I am sick of their hollow promises and self-seeking
    policies.  The Conservatives are experts at sweeping things under the
    carpet and blaming everybody else for their incompetence, while Labour are
    masters of hypocrisy and short sightedness.  However, spoiling one's 
    ballot in protest is just a waste of time - I would rather just abstain 
    alltogether.
    
    I still don't know who to vote for - perhaps, better the devil you know... 
    
    CHARLOTTE
                                                                  
38.13.12 is spot on !COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceWed Mar 19 1997 12:253
    Maybe there should be a box titled "None of the above"
    
    Chris
38.14TERRI::SIMONSemper in ExcernereWed Mar 19 1997 13:299
What annoys me is those people who don't vote or even 
worse refuse to register as a political statement, then
complain about the the governement that gets in.

Even more annoying is that they think they have a greater
right to complain than the voter has and can't comprehend 
that fact.

Simon
38.15MOVIES::POTTERhttp://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/Wed Mar 19 1997 14:3710
   What annoys me is those people who don't vote or even 
   worse refuse to register as a political statement, then
   complain about the the governement that gets in.

Agreed - one thing that I accept if I do choose to spoil my ballot paper is 
that my right to complain about the government we end up with is at best 
severely limited.

regards,
//alan
38.16TERRI::SIMONSemper in ExcernereWed Mar 19 1997 14:576
I suppose it is a bit like refusing to enter a competition
to win an Escort, then complaining it isn't a BMW.

:-)

Simon
38.17COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceWed Mar 19 1997 16:0112
    No,  I think it's more like a choice between Liver and Liver Stew
    (presumming you don't like liver) and then complaining that you're
    hungry when you don't eat it.
    
    It's all very well having a choice if you've got something to choose
    from.
    
    Does that make sense....I don't know...
    
    Chris
    
    
38.18SUPER::DENISEunholy water.... sanguine addiction...2 silver bulletsWed Mar 19 1997 16:023
    
    	hey chris!
    	what's new on the willy front???
38.19COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceWed Mar 19 1997 16:077
    Shhhhh, not here ::DENISE.
    
    Actually I don;t know, haven't heard from him for ages, think he;s been
    abducted by aliens (that's the only reasonable explanation now).
    
    Chris
    PS. Sorry to clogg this note up....
38.20SUPER::DENISEunholy water.... sanguine addiction...2 silver bulletsWed Mar 19 1997 20:097
    
    	like anybody is goint to CARE, chris.
    
    	i think you'd better send out your version of the cavalry,
    	toute suite!!!
    
    	p.s. i'm not.
38.2145080::CWINPENNYWed Apr 16 1997 11:1319
    
    When Michael Heseltine was asked this morning on Radio 4, "Seeing as
    how the majority of the Cabinets children attend public school what
    does this say for the handling of the education system over the last 19
    years?"
    
    His response, "I suppose you'd better ask Tony Blair". This either
    means his Governemnt has no defined policy on education other than to
    let it rot or Mr.Blair has been setting the education policy of the
    current Government. I doubt it's the latter.
    
    He then waffled on about giving parents choice. The only choice I can
    see for parents is to pay for a place in a public school or trust your
    chances with a run down underfunded education system. Now obviously
    Mr.Blair wants the best for his children and it is a crying shame that
    the only way he can get this is by taking his children out of the state
    system.
    
    Chris
38.22IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Wed Apr 16 1997 11:354
    I think Mr Blair should be commended for paying for his own children's
    education and thus removing some of the load on the state schools.

    Jamie.
38.23VAXCAT::LAURIEDesktop Consultant, Project EnterpriseWed Apr 16 1997 13:3015
    Sorry, Chris, but I don't believe the UK school system is under-funded.
    
    It's been raped over the years by trendy, liberal, wishy-washy
    so-called educationalists, who threw away the perfectly good Grammar
    School system and replaced it with the so-called Comprehensive system,
    and then screwed that up. Believe me, if there were a decent
    state-funded system, then people like me wouldn't be paying 14K a year
    for public schools. Throwing money at State education won't fix its
    problems. It's rotten to the core, and all thanks to that stupid
    Shirley Williams and her left-wing political agenda and ideology.
    
    That said, Heseltine should know better than to duck a perfectly good
    question and try to turn it into a school-boy taunt.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
38.24Agreed but.....IRNBRU::61549::SpikeWelcome to the Rimmer ExperienceWed Apr 16 1997 15:4624
>    Sorry, Chris, but I don't believe the UK school system is under-funded.
 
>    It's been raped over the years by trendy, liberal, wishy-washy
>    so-called educationalists, who threw away the perfectly good Grammar
>    School system and replaced it with the so-called Comprehensive system,
>    and then screwed that up. Believe me, if there were a decent
>    state-funded system, then people like me wouldn't be paying 14K a year
>    for public schools. Throwing money at State education won't fix its
>    problems. It's rotten to the core, and all thanks to that stupid
>    Shirley Williams and her left-wing political agenda and ideology.
 
Agree 100% but that was 20+ years ago.

>    That said, Heseltine should know better than to duck a perfectly good
>    question and try to turn it into a school-boy taunt.

He ducked it because he knows the Cons have made a bad situation far
worse. The ONLY interest the Cons have in education, as with most things
people care about, is how they can make political gain from it and hang
on to power.

>    Cheers, Laurie.

Rgds, Steve.
38.2545080::CWINPENNYWed Apr 16 1997 20:326
    
    Re: .23
    
    No need to be soory old bean, differences of opinion and all that.
    
    Chris
38.26VAXCAT::GOLDYNew romantic goldfishThu Apr 17 1997 09:327
    Re .23
    
    > No need to be soory old bean, differences of opinion and all that.
                    ^^^^^
    ODE.
    
    Goldy.
38.27MOVIES::POTTERhttp://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/Wed Apr 30 1997 19:579
Time to make your predictions known:

I say Labour, with an overall majority of 48 seats.  

And if so, pity me, for I live in Scotland and - if Labour sticks to its
promises - am about to get an extra tier of government.

regards,
//alan
38.2845862::DODDThu May 01 1997 09:2115
    I refer the honourable member to the answer I gave some moments ago
    (.7)
    
    My greatest wish is that Harrogate elects the Lib-Dem candidate or we
    will be doomed to 5 years of Norman Lamont smiling from the local
    paper. Or more likely we won't as he still lives down south. We have 2
    4 foot square lib dem boards in our garden.
    
    I shall be voting Tory for the local council.
    
    Andrew
    
    PS It was quaintly British, as I drove over to OLO this morning to see
    the "Polling Station" signs going up on shool halls, tin sheds etc in
    the bright spring sunshine.
38.29MOVIES::POTTERhttp://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/Thu May 01 1997 10:0714
>    We have 2 4 foot square lib dem boards in our garden.
>    I shall be voting Tory for the local council.
    
Talk about bucking the trend!  Most folk expect poeple to vote Tory or
Labour at the general elections and LibDem for local!

>    PS It was quaintly British, as I drove over to OLO this morning to see
>    the "Polling Station" signs going up on shool halls, tin sheds etc in
>    the bright spring sunshine.

Yeah, I had the same thought myself!

regards,
//alan
38.3045862::DODDThu May 01 1997 15:5216
    Not really Alan. I am being entirely consistent. I'm voting for the
    man, and what I think he has to offer.
    
    I do not want Norman Lamont as my MP - the Lib Dem has worked hard on
    the local council for years. If he wants to go on to be an MP that's
    fine by me.
    
    The Tory local councillor works hard for local issues. The council is
    run by the Lib-dems.
    
    In both cases I believe that too large a majority is a bad thing,
    witness what has happened to the Tories, arrogance and complacency.
    
    I rest my case.
    
    Andrew
38.31MOVIES::POTTERhttp://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/Thu May 01 1997 16:1215
I wasn't trying to suggest that you were in any way wrong, far from it.

WHat I was noting was that you are going the opposite way from the "received
wisdom" of the way that our electoral system tends to work.

We tend to be told that LibDems do well at local level because -- as you
observed -- LibDem councillors seem to be pretty savvy and work hard for their
constituents.  They tend to believe in local service and they aren't merely
using their council works as a holding area while they win brownie points to
let them stand as MPs.

That's all!

regards,
//alan
38.32CHEFS::7A1_GRNA hangover is the wrath of grapesThu May 01 1997 16:208
    Today, for the first time in a very long time, I read The Sun, which
    sports a picture of Tony Blair, the gold sparkly hand and the slogan,
    "It must be you" on the frontpage.
    
    I know that they have recently changed camps, but the amount of
    political bias in today's copy is utterly comical.
    
    CHARLOTTE 
38.33VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishThu May 01 1997 16:263
    I still haven't decided who to vote for.
    
    Goldy.
38.34VAXCAT::LAURIEDesktop Consultant, Project EnterpriseThu May 01 1997 17:113
    If I had a vote, I'd vote Tory for both national and local gummints.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
38.3545080::CWINPENNYThu May 01 1997 18:096
    
    If I had a vote, I'd vote Labour for both national and local gummints.
    
    But back home I don't think they'll miss my vote.
    
    Chris
38.36NPSS::MCSKEANEdrink me a riverFri May 02 1997 05:567
    
    Well after watching the Election results 'live' on the Web, it looks
    like Labour are back in power. In a way I'm glad that they're in, but
    then again, I'm glad I'm out of the country just in case they make a
    complete 2.12 of it all.
    
    POL$never_voted_Labour_in_his_life 
38.37IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 06:5330
    RTw  02-May-97 06:39    

    Latest state of parties in British election

    Copyright 1997 Reuters Ltd.  All rights reserved.
  
    LONDON, May 2 (Reuter) - Following is a breakdown of the number of
    parliamentary seats each party has won so far in Britain's election,
    the share of votes each has polled, and the estimated final tally of
    seats for each party, with 615 results in from Britain's 659
    constituencies - 

     CONSERVATIVES.......151 (151 held, 172 lost) 
     LABOUR..............413 (270 held, 143 gained) 
     LIBERAL DEMOCRATS....40 (13 held, 27 gained, 2 lost) 
     OTHERS...............11 (7 held, 4 gained) 
     Average swing to Labour from Conservatives - 10.4 percent 
     Projected final total of seats according to BBC estimate - 
     CONSERVATIVES.......164 
     LABOUR..............420 
     LIBERAL DEMOCRATS....46 
     OTHERS...............29 
     Predicted majority for Labour - 181 

    Share of the vote so far - Conservatives 31 percent, Labour 45 percent,
    Liberal Democrats 17 percent 

    REUTER


38.38IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 06:5910
    Well as you see from the previous reply it was not so much a landslide
    for Labour it was more of a rout of the Tories.

    Five cabinet ministers are now looking for honest work these include
    the Foreign Secretary, Riffkin and the Minister of Defence, Portillo.

    After 18 years in opposition Labour is now in with its biggest majority
    ever. The promised land should therefore be just round the corner.

    Jamie.
38.39Something about the colour of grass.HIPS::WATSONEenie meenie minee moe...That one!Fri May 02 1997 09:151
    The promised land is always just round the corner.
38.40IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 10:1512
    Labour 417

    Tory   160

    LibDem  40

    Other   11
    
    Current Labour majority 216

    Martin Bell, former war correspondent for the BBC and anti-sleaze
    candidate has taken the seat of Niel Hamilton with a 20,000 majority.
38.41VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 10:307
    Re .38
    
    > The promised land should therefore be just round the corner.
    
    I just hope they can deliver the promises they have made.
    
    Goldy.
38.42HIPS::WATSONLiving in interesting timesFri May 02 1997 10:464
    Anyone know where I can get hold of the current Labour Party manifesto
    so I can determine in greater detail what these promises entail ?
    
    Rik
38.43CURRNT::WARBURTONFri May 02 1997 10:477
    
    I am happy with the result, regardless of who I voted for, as I think a
    bit of new blood can't do the country any harm. And they've only got 4
    years to prove it one way or the other anyway. 
    
    Julie. 
    
38.44What next?45862::blyth.lzo.dec.com::hiltong[email protected]Fri May 02 1997 10:476
So what happens next? Blair get's in, picks his cabinet, then what?

Is there a budget?
A massive announcement with loads of new policies?

Greg (never seen a change of government in my voting life before)
38.45VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 10:527
    Goodness Greg, I'd forgotten you were a youngster too!
    
    I too would be interested to (now) read the Labour Party Manifesto. I
    saw the Con and LB ones on sale in Tesco's but not Labour's. I wonder
    if it's available on the world-wide wibble wobble.
    
    Goldy.
38.46CHEFS::7A1_GRNA hangover is the wrath of grapesFri May 02 1997 10:5612
    Re. 42
    
    The manifesto is on the web.  
    
    Re. 44
    
    Well, there certainly will be a cabinet re-shuffle and then I expect Mr
    Blair will embark on his first foreign visit to meet with other world
    leaders to discuss "investment and foreign policy" over copious
    quantities of cognac and Havana cigars :^)
    
    CHARLOTTE
38.47VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 10:574
    Re .46
    
    Where?
    
38.48CHEFS::7A1_GRNA hangover is the wrath of grapesFri May 02 1997 11:006
    In gentlemens' clubs? :^)
    
    Goldy, if you mean the manifesto, I used altavista and then searched for
    "Labour". 
    
    CHARLOTTE
38.49VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 11:017
    Ah.
    
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/election97/framedir/partiesframe.htm
    
    http://www.labour.org.uk
    
    Goldy.
38.50VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 11:085
    You can download a text version of the Labour manifesto from
    
    http://www.labourwin97.org.uk/manifesto/britain/manifesto.txt
    
    Goldy.
38.51Most of the Labour manifesto, my link dropped.IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 11:1394
    Britain will be better with new Labour
    'Our case is simple: that Britain can and must be better'
    'The vision is one of national renewal, a country with drive, purpose
    and energy'
    'In each area of policy a new and distinctive approach has been mapped
    out, one that differs from the old left and the Conservative right.
    This is why new Labour is new'
    'New Labour is a party of ideas and ideals but not of outdated
    ideology. What counts is what works. The objectives are radical. The
    means will be modern'
    'This is our contract with the people'
    I believe in Britain. It is a great country with a great history. The
    British people are a great people.  But I believe Britain can and must
    be better: better schools, better hospitals, better ways of tackling
    crime, of building a modern welfare state, of equipping ourselves for a
    new world economy.
    I want a Britain that is one nation, with shared values and purpose,
    where merit comes before privilege, run for the many not the few,
    strong and sure of itself at home and abroad.
    I want a Britain that does not shuffle into the new millennium afraid
    of the future, but strides into it with confidence.
    I want to renew our country's faith in the ability of its government
    and politics to deliver this new Britain.
    I want to do it by making a limited set of important promises and
    achieving them. This is the purpose of the bond of trust I set out at
    the end of this introduction, in which ten specific commitments are put
    before you. Hold us to them. They are our covenant with you. 
    I want to renew faith in politics by being honest about the last 18
    years. Some things the Conservatives got right. We will not change
    them. It is where they got things wrong that we will make change. We
    have no intention or desire to replace one set of dogmas by another. 
    I want to renew faith in politics through a government that will govern
    in the interest of the many, the broad majority of people who work
    hard, play by the rules, pay their dues and feel let down by a
    political system that gives the breaks to the few, to an elite at the
    top increasingly out of touch with the rest of us.
    And I want, above all, to govern in a way that brings our country
    together, that unites our nation in facing the tough and dangerous
    challenges of the new economy and changed society in which we must
    live. I want a Britain which we all feel part of, in whose future we
    all have a stake, in which what I want for my own children I want for
    yours.
    A new politics
    The reason for having created new Labour is to meet the challenges of a
    different world. The millennium symbolises a new era opening up for
    Britain. I am confident about our future prosperity, even optimistic,
    if we have the courage to change and use it to build a better Britain.
     To accomplish this means more than just a change of government. Our
    aim is no less than to set British political life on a new course for
    the future.
    People are cynical about politics and distrustful of political
    promises. That is hardly surprising. There have been few more gross
    breaches of faith than when the Conservatives under Mr Major promised,
    before the election of 1992, that they would not raise taxes, but would
    cut them every year; and then went on to raise them by the largest
    amount in peacetime history starting in the first Budget after the
    election. The Exchange Rate Mechanism as the cornerstone of economic
    policy, Europe, health, crime, schools, sleaze � the broken promises
    are strewn across the country's memory.
    The Conservatives' broken promises taint all politics. That is why we
    have made it our guiding rule not to promise what we cannot deliver;
    and to deliver what we promise. What follows is not the politics of a
    100 days that dazzles for a time, then fizzles out. It is not the
    politics of a revolution, but of a fresh start, the patient rebuilding
    and renewing of this country � renewal that can take root and build
    over time. 
    That is one way in which politics in Britain will gain a new lease of
    life. But there is another. We aim to put behind us the bitter
    political struggles of left and right that have torn our country apart
    for too many decades. Many of these conflicts have no relevance
    whatsoever to the modern world � public versus private, bosses versus
    workers, middle class versus working class. It is time for this country
    to move on and move forward. We are proud of our history, proud of what
    we have achieved � but we must learn from our history, not be chained
    to it.
    New Labour
    The purpose of new Labour is to give Britain a different political
    choice: the choice between a failed Conservative government, exhausted
    and divided in everything other than its desire to cling on to power,
    and a new and revitalised Labour Party that has been resolute in
    transforming itself into a party of the future. 
    We have rewritten our constitution, the new Clause IV, to put a
    commitment to enterprise alongside the commitment to justice. We have
    changed the way we make policy, and put our relations with the trade
    unions on a modern footing where they accept they can get fairness but
    no favours from a Labour government. Our MPs are all now selected by
    ordinary party members, not small committees or pressure groups. The
    membership itself has doubled, to over 400,000, with half the members
    having joined since the last election. 
    We submitted our draft manifesto, new Labour new life for Britain, to a
    ballot of all our members, 95 per cent of whom gave it their express
    endorsement.
    We are a national party, supported today by people from all walks of
    life, from the successful businessman or woman to the pensi
38.52Labour Manifesto (full version)VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 11:181936
Britain will be better with new Labour



'Our case is simple: that Britain can and must be better' 'The vision is

one of national renewal, a country with drive, purpose and energy' 'In

each area of policy a new and distinctive approach has been mapped out,

one that differs from the old left and the Conservative right. This is

why new Labour is new' 'New Labour is a party of ideas and ideals but

not of outdated ideology. What counts is what works. The objectives are

radical. The means will be modern' 'This is our contract with the

people'



I believe in Britain. It is a great country with a great history. The

British people are a great people.  But I believe Britain can and must

be better: better schools, better hospitals, better ways of tackling

crime, of building a modern welfare state, of equipping ourselves for a

new world economy. I want a Britain that is one nation, with shared

values and purpose, where merit comes before privilege, run for the many

not the few, strong and sure of itself at home and abroad. I want a

Britain that does not shuffle into the new millennium afraid of the

future, but strides into it with confidence. I want to renew our

country's faith in the ability of its government and politics to deliver

this new Britain. I want to do it by making a limited set of important

promises and achieving them. This is the purpose of the bond of trust I

set out at the end of this introduction, in which ten specific

commitments are put before you. Hold us to them. They are our covenant

with you. I want to renew faith in politics by being honest about the

last 18 years. Some things the Conservatives got right. We will not

change them. It is where they got things wrong that we will make change.

We have no intention or desire to replace one set of dogmas by another.

I want to renew faith in politics through a government that will govern

in the interest of the many, the broad majority of people who work hard,

play by the rules, pay their dues and feel let down by a political

system that gives the breaks to the few, to an elite at the top

increasingly out of touch with the rest of us. And I want, above all, to

govern in a way that brings our country together, that unites our nation

in facing the tough and dangerous challenges of the new economy and

changed society in which we must live. I want a Britain which we all

feel part of, in whose future we all have a stake, in which what I want

for my own children I want for yours.





A new politics The reason for having created new Labour is to meet the

challenges of a different world. The millennium symbolises a new era

opening up for Britain. I am confident about our future prosperity, even

optimistic, if we have the courage to change and use it to build a

better Britain. To accomplish this means more than just a change of

government. Our aim is no less than to set British political life on a

new course for the future. People are cynical about politics and

distrustful of political promises. That is hardly surprising. There have

been few more gross breaches of faith than when the Conservatives under

Mr Major promised, before the election of 1992, that they would not

raise taxes, but would cut them every year; and then went on to raise

them by the largest amount in peacetime history starting in the first

Budget after the election. The Exchange Rate Mechanism as the

cornerstone of economic policy, Europe, health, crime, schools, sleaze �

the broken promises are strewn across the country's memory. The

Conservatives' broken promises taint all politics. That is why we have

made it our guiding rule not to promise what we cannot deliver; and to

deliver what we promise. What follows is not the politics of a 100 days

that dazzles for a time, then fizzles out. It is not the politics of a

revolution, but of a fresh start, the patient rebuilding and renewing of

this country � renewal that can take root and build over time. That is

one way in which politics in Britain will gain a new lease of life. But

there is another. We aim to put behind us the bitter political struggles

of left and right that have torn our country apart for too many decades.

Many of these conflicts have no relevance whatsoever to the modern world

� public versus private, bosses versus workers, middle class versus

working class. It is time for this country to move on and move forward.

We are proud of our history, proud of what we have achieved � but we

must learn from our history, not be chained to it.





New Labour The purpose of new Labour is to give Britain a different

political choice: the choice between a failed Conservative government,

exhausted and divided in everything other than its desire to cling on to

power, and a new and revitalised Labour Party that has been resolute in

transforming itself into a party of the future. We have rewritten our

constitution, the new Clause IV, to put a commitment to enterprise

alongside the commitment to justice. We have changed the way we make

policy, and put our relations with the trade unions on a modern footing

where they accept they can get fairness but no favours from a Labour

government. Our MPs are all now selected by ordinary party members, not

small committees or pressure groups. The membership itself has doubled,

to over 400,000, with half the members having joined since the last

election. We submitted our draft manifesto, new Labour new life for

Britain, to a ballot of all our members, 95 per cent of whom gave it

their express endorsement. We are a national party, supported today by

people from all walks of life, from the successful businessman or woman

to the pensioner on a council estate. Young people have flooded in to

join us in what is the fastest growing youth section of any political

party in the western world.





The vision We are a broad-based movement for progress and justice. New

Labour is the political arm of none other than the British people as a

whole. Our values are the same: the equal worth of all, with no one cast

aside; fairness and justice within strong communities. But we have

liberated these values from outdated dogma or doctrine, and we have

applied these values to the modern world. I want a country in which

people get on, do well, make a success of their lives. I have no time

for the politics of envy. We need more successful entrepreneurs, not

fewer of them. But these life-chances should be for all the people. And

I want a society in which ambition and compassion are seen as partners

not opposites � where we value public service as well as material

wealth. New Labour believes in a society where we do not simply pursue

our own individual aims but where we hold many aims in common and work

together to achieve them. How we build the industry and employment

opportunities of the future; how we tackle the division and inequality

in our society; how we care for and enhance our environment and quality

of life; how we develop modern education and health services; how we

create communities that are safe, where mutual respect and tolerance are

the order of the day. These are things we must achieve together as a

country. The vision is one of national renewal, a country with drive,

purpose and energy. A Britain equipped to prosper in a global economy of

technological change; with a modern welfare state; its politics more

accountable; and confident of its place in the world.





Programme: a new centre and centre-left politics In each area of policy

a new and distinctive approach has been mapped out, one that differs

both from the solutions of the old left and those of the Conservative

right. This is why new Labour is new. We believe in the strength of our

values, but we recognise also that the policies of 1997 cannot be those

of 1947 or 1967. More detailed policy has been produced by us than by

any opposition in history. Our direction and destination are clear. The

old left would have sought state control of industry. The Conservative

right is content to leave all to the market. We reject both approaches.

Government and industry must work together to achieve key objectives

aimed at enhancing the dynamism of the market, not undermining it. In

industrial relations, we make it clear that there will be no return to

flying pickets, secondary action, strikes with no ballots or the trade

union law of the 1970s. There will instead be basic minimum rights for

the individual at the workplace, where our aim is partnership not

conflict between employers and employees. In economic management, we

accept the global economy as a reality and reject the isolationism and

�go-it-alone' policies of the extremes of right or left. In education,

we reject both the idea of a return to the 11-plus and the monolithic

comprehensive schools that take no account of children's differing

abilities. Instead we favour all-in schooling which identifies the

distinct abilities of individual pupils and organises them in classes to

maximise their progress in individual subjects. In this way we modernise

the comprehensive principle, learning from the experience of its 30

years of application. In health policy, we will safeguard the basic

principles of the NHS, which we founded, but will not return to the

top-down management of the 1970s. So we will keep the planning and

provision of healthcare separate, but put planning on a longer-term,

decentralised and more co-operative basis. The key is to root out

unnecessary administrative cost, and to spend money on the right things

� frontline care. On crime, we believe in personal responsibility and in

punishing crime, but also tackling its underlying causes � so, tough on

crime, tough on the causes of crime, different from the Labour approach

of the past and the Tory policy of today. Over-centralisation of

government and lack of accountability was a problem in governments of

both left and right. Labour is committed to the democratic renewal of

our country through decentralisation and the elimination of excessive

government secrecy. In addition, we will face up to the new issues that

confront us. We will be the party of welfare reform. In consultation and

partnership with the people, we will design a modern welfare state based

on rights and duties going together, fit for the modern world. We will

stand up for Britain's interests in Europe after the shambles of the

last six years, but, more than that, we will lead a campaign for reform

in Europe. Europe isn't working in the way this country and Europe need.

But to lead means to be involved, to be constructive, to be capable of

getting our own way. We will put concern for the environment at the

heart of policy-making, so that it is not an add-on extra, but informs

the whole of government, from housing and energy policy through to

global warming and international agreements. We will search out at every

turn new ways and new ideas to tackle the new issues: how to encourage

more flexible working hours and practices to suit employees and

employers alike; how to harness the huge potential of the new

information technology; how to simplify the processes of the government

machine; how to put public and private sector together in partnership to

give us the infrastructure and transport system we need. We will be a

radical government. But the definition of radicalism will not be that of

doctrine, whether of left or right, but of achievement. New Labour is a

party of ideas and ideals but not of outdated ideology. What counts is

what works. The objectives are radical. The means will be modern. So the

party is transformed. The vision is clear. And from that vision stems a

modern programme of change and renewal for Britain. We understand that

after 18 years of one-party rule, people want change, believe that it is

necessary for the country and for democracy, but require faith to make

the change. We therefore set out in the manifesto that follows ten

commitments, commitments that form our bond of trust with the people.

They are specific. They are real. Judge us on them. Have trust in us and

we will repay that trust. Our mission in politics is to rebuild this

bond of trust between government and the people. That is the only way

democracy can flourish. I pledge to Britain a government which shares

their hopes, which understands their fears, and which will work as

partners with and for all our people, not just the privileged few. This

is our contract with the people.





Over the five years of a Labour government:



1 	Education will be our number one priority, and we will increase

the share of national income spent on education as we decrease it on the

bills of economic and social failure



2 	There will be no increase in the basic or top rates of income tax



3 	We will provide stable economic growth with low inflation, and

promote dynamic and competitive business and industry at home and abroad



4 	We will get 250,000 young unemployed off benefit and into work



5 	We will rebuild the NHS, reducing spending on administration and

increasing spending on patient care



6 	We will be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime, and

halve the time it takes persistent juvenile offenders to come to court



7 	We will help build strong families and strong communities, and lay

the foundations of a modern welfare state in pensions and community care



8 	We will safeguard our environment, and develop an integrated

transport policy to fight congestion and pollution



9 	We will clean up politics, decentralise political power throughout

the United Kingdom and put the funding of political parties on a proper

and accountable basis



10 We will give Britain the leadership in Europe which Britain and

Europe need



We have modernised the Labour Party and we will modernise Britain. This

means knowing where we want to go; being clear-headed about the

country's future; telling the truth; making tough choices; insisting

that all parts of the public sector live within their means; taking on

vested interests that hold people back; standing up to unreasonable

demands from any quarter; and being prepared to give a moral lead where

government has responsibilities it should not avoid. Britain does

deserve better. And new Labour will be better for Britain.





A copy of the manifesto is available in Braille and on cassette. Please

phone 0171 277 3410



Visit Labour's general election website at http://www.labourwin97.org.uk



















We will make education our number one priority





- Cut class sizes to 30 or under for 5, 6 and 7 year-olds - Nursery

places for all four year-olds - Attack low standards in schools - Access

to computer technology - Lifelong learning through a new University for

Industry - More spending on education as the cost of unemployment falls





Education has been the Tories' biggest failure. It is Labour's number

one priority. It is not just good for the individual. It is an economic

necessity for the nation. We will compete successfully on the basis of

quality or not at all. And quality comes from developing the potential

of all our people. It is the people who are our greatest natural asset.

We will ensure they can fulfil their potential. Nearly half of 11

year-olds in England and Wales fail to reach expected standards in

English and maths. Britain has a smaller share of 17 and 18 year-olds in

full-time education than any major industrial nation. Nearly two thirds

of the British workforce lack vocational qualifications. There are

excellent schools in Britain's state education system. But far too many

children are denied the opportunity to succeed. Our task is to raise the

standards of every school. We will put behind us the old arguments that

have bedevilled education in this country. We reject the Tories'

obsession with school structures: all parents should be offered real

choice through good quality schools, each with its own strengths and

individual ethos. There should be no return to the 11-plus. It divides

children into successes and failures at far too early an age. We must

modernise comprehensive schools. Children are not all of the same

ability, nor do they learn at the same speed. That means �setting'

children in classes to maximise progress, for the benefit of high-fliers

and slower learners alike. The focus must be on levelling up, not

levelling down. With Labour, the Department for Education and Employment

will become a leading office of state. It will give a strong and

consistent lead to help raise standards in every school. Standards, more

than structures, are the key to success. Labour will never put dogma

before children's education. Our approach will be to intervene where

there are problems, not where schools are succeeding. Labour will never

force the abolition of good schools whether in the private or state

sector. Any changes in the admissions policies of grammar schools will

be decided by local parents. Church schools will retain their

distinctive religious ethos. We wish to build bridges wherever we can

across education divides. The educational apartheid created by the

public/private divide diminishes the whole education system.





Zero tolerance of underperformance Every school has the capacity to

succeed. All Local Education Authorities (LEAs) must demonstrate that

every school is improving. For those failing schools unable to improve,

ministers will order a �fresh start' � close the school and start afresh

on the same site. Where good schools and bad schools coexist side by

side we will authorise LEAs to allow one school to take over the other

to set the underperforming school on a new path.





Quality nursery education guaranteed for all four year-olds Nursery

vouchers have been proven not to work. They are costly and do not

generate more quality nursery places. We will use the money saved by

scrapping nursery vouchers to guarantee places for four year-olds. We

will invite selected local authorities to pilot early excellence centres

combining education and care for the under-fives. We will set targets

for universal provision for three year-olds whose parents want it.





New focus on standards in primary schools Primary schools are the key to

mastering the basics and developing in every child an eagerness to

learn. Every school needs baseline assessment of pupils when they enter

the school, and a year-on-year target for improvement. We will reduce

class sizes for five, six and seven year-olds to 30 or under, by phasing

out the assisted places scheme, the cost of which is set to rise to �180

million per year. We must recognise the three �r's for what they are �

building blocks of all learning that must be taught better. We will

achieve this by improving the skills of the teaching force; ensuring a

stronger focus on literacy in the curriculum; and piloting literacy

summer schools to meet our new target that within a decade every child

leaves primary school with a reading age of at least 11 (barely half do

today). Our numeracy taskforce will develop equally ambitious targets.

We will encourage the use of the most effective teaching methods,

including phonics for reading and whole class interactive teaching for

maths.





Attacking educational disadvantage No matter where a school is, Labour

will not tolerate under-achievement. Public/private partnerships will

improve the condition of school buildings. There will be education

action zones to attack low standards by recruiting the best teachers and

head teachers to under-achieving schools; by supporting voluntary

mentoring schemes to provide one-to-one support for disadvantaged

pupils; and by creating new opportunities for children, after the age of

14, to enhance their studies by acquiring knowledge and experience

within industry and commerce. To attack under-achievement in urban

areas, we have developed a new scheme with the Premier League. In

partnerships between central government, local government and football

clubs, study support centres will be set up at Premier League grounds

for the benefit of local children. The scheme will be launched on a

pilot basis during the 1997/8 season. We support the greatest possible

integration into mainstream education of pupils with special educational

needs, while recognising that specialist facilities are essential to

meet particular needs.





Realising the potential of new technology Labour is the pioneer of new

thinking.  We have agreed with British Telecom and the cable companies

that they will wire up schools, libraries, colleges and hospitals to the

information superhighway free of charge. We have also secured agreement

to make access charges as low as possible. For the Internet we plan a

National Grid for Learning, franchised as a public/private partnership,

which will bring to teachers up-to-date materials to enhance their

skills, and to children high-quality educational materials. We will use

lottery money to improve the skills of existing teachers in information

technology. In opposition, Labour set up the independent Stevenson

Commission to promote access for children to new technology. Its recent

report is a challenging programme for the future.  We are urgently

examining how to implement its plans, in particular the development of

educational software through a grading system which will provide schools

with guarantees of product quality; and the provision for every child of

an individual email address. An independent standing committee will

continue to advise us on the implementation of our plans in government.





The role of parents We will increase the powers and responsibilities of

parents. There will be more parent governors and, for the first time,

parent representatives on LEAs. A major objective is to promote a

culture of responsibility for learning within the family, through

contracts between all schools and parents, defining the responsibilities

of each. National guidelines will establish minimum periods for homework

for primary and secondary school pupils. Teachers will be entitled to

positive support from parents to promote good attendance and sound

discipline. Schools suffer from unruly and disruptive pupils. Exclusion

or suspension may sometimes be necessary. We will, however, pilot new

pupil referral units so that schools are protected but these pupils are

not lost to education or the country.





New job description for LEAs The judge and jury of LEA performance will

be their contribution to raising standards. LEAs are closer to schools

than central government, and have the authority of being locally

elected. But they will be required to devolve power, and more of their

budgets, to heads and governors. LEA performance will be inspected by

Ofsted and the Audit Commission. Where authorities are deemed to be

failing, the secretary of state may suspend the relevant powers of the

LEA and send in an improvement team.





Grant maintained schools Schools that are now grant maintained will

prosper with Labour's proposals, as will every school. Tory claims that

Labour will close these schools are false. The system of funding will

not discriminate unfairly either between schools or between pupils. LEAs

will be represented on governing bodies, but will not control them. We

support guidelines for open and fair admissions, along the lines of

those introduced in 1993; but we will also provide a right of appeal to

an independent panel in disputed cases.





Teachers: pressure and support Schools are critically dependent on the

quality of all staff. The majority of teachers are skilful and

dedicated, but some fall short. We will improve teacher training, and

ensure that all teachers have an induction year when they first qualify,

to ensure their suitability for teaching. There will be a general

teaching council to speak for and raise standards in the profession. We

will create a new grade of teachers to recognise the best. There will,

however, be speedy, but fair, procedures to remove teachers who cannot

do the job. The strength of a school is critically dependent on the

quality of its head. We will establish mandatory qualifications for the

post. A head teacher will be appointed to a position only when fully

trained to accept the responsibility.





Higher education The improvement and expansion needed cannot be funded

out of general taxation. Our proposals for funding have been made to the

Dearing Committee, in line with successful policies abroad. The costs of

student maintenance should be repaid by graduates on an income-related

basis, from the career success to which higher education has

contributed. The current system is badly administered and payback

periods are too short. We will provide efficient administration, with

fairness ensured by longer payback periods where required.





Lifelong learning We must learn throughout life, to retain employment

through new and improved skills. We will promote adult learning both at

work and in the critical sector of further education. In schools and

colleges, we support broader A-levels and upgraded vocational

qualifications, underpinned by rigorous standards and key skills.

Employers have the primary responsibility for training their workforces

in job-related skills. But individuals should be given the power to

invest in training. We will invest public money for training in

Individual Learning Accounts which individuals � for example women

returning to the labour force � can then use to gain the skills they

want. We will kickstart the programme for up to a million people, using

�150 million of TEC money which could be better used and which would

provide a contribution of �150, alongside individuals making small

investments of their own. Employers will be encouraged to make voluntary

contributions to these funds. We will also promote the extension of the

Investors in People initiative into many more small firms. Our new

University for Industry, collaborating with the Open University, will

bring new opportunities to adults seeking to develop their potential. 

This will bring government, industry and education together to create a

new resource whose remit will be to use new technology to enhance skills

and education. The University for Industry will be a public/private

partnership, commissioning software and developing the links to extend

lifelong learning.





Government spending on education The Conservatives have cut government

spending on education as a share of national income by the equivalent of

more than �3 billion as spending on the bills of economic and social

failure has risen. We are committed to reversing this trend of spending.

Over the course of a five-year Parliament, as we cut the costs of

economic and social failure we will raise the proportion of national

income spent on education.













We will promote personal prosperity for all - Economic stability to

promote investment - Tough inflation target, mortgage rates as low as

possible - Stick for two years within existing spending limits -

Five-year pledge: no increase in income tax rates - Long-term objective

of ten pence starting rate of income tax - Early Budget to get people

off welfare and into work



T  he Conservatives have in 18 years created the two longest, deepest

recessions this century. We have experienced the slowest average growth

rate of any similar period since the second world war. There has been a

fundamental failure to tackle the underlying causes of inflation, of low

growth and of unemployment. These are: too much economic instability,

with wild swings from boom to bust too little investment in education

and skills, and in the application of new technologies too few

opportunities to find jobs, start new businesses or become self-employed

too narrow an industrial base and too little sense of common purpose in

the workplace or across the nation. Britain can do better. We must build

on the British qualities of inventiveness, creativity and adaptability.

New Labour's objective is to improve living standards for the many, not

just the few. Business can and must succeed in raising productivity.

This requires a combination of a skilled and educated workforce with

investment in the latest technological innovations, as the route to

higher wages and employment. An explicit objective of a Labour

government will be to raise the trend rate of growth by strengthening

our wealth-creating base. We will nurture investment in industry,

skills, infrastructure and new technologies. And we will attack

long-term unemployment, especially among young people. Our goal will be

educational and employment opportunities for all. Economic stability is

the essential platform for sustained growth. In a global economy the

route to growth is stability not inflation. The priority must be stable,

low-inflation conditions for long-term growth. The root causes of

inflation and low growth are the same � an economic and industrial base

that remains weak. Government cannot solve all economic problems or end

the economic cycle. But by spending wisely and taxing fairly, government

can help tackle the problems. Our goals are low inflation, rising living

standards and high and stable levels of employment. Spending and tax:

new Labour's approach The myth that the solution to every problem is

increased spending has been comprehensively dispelled under the

Conservatives. Spending has risen. But more spending has brought neither

greater fairness nor less poverty. Quite the reverse � our society is

more divided than it has been for generations. The level of public

spending is no longer the best measure of the effectiveness of

government action in the public interest. It is what money is actually

spent on that counts more than how much money is spent. The national

debt has doubled under John Major. The public finances remain weak. A

new Labour government will give immediate high priority to seeing how

public money can be better used. New Labour will be wise spenders, not

big spenders. We will work in partnership with the private sector to

achieve our goals. We will ask about public spending the first question

that a manager in any company would ask � can existing resources be used

more effectively to meet our priorities? And because efficiency and

value for money are central, ministers will be required to save before

they spend. Save to invest is our approach, not tax and spend. The

increase in taxes under the Conservatives is the most dramatic evidence

of economic failure. Since 1992 the typical family has paid more than

�2,000 in extra taxes � the biggest tax hike in peacetime history,

breaking every promise made by John Major at the last election. The

tragedy is that those hardest hit are least able to pay. That is why we

strongly opposed the imposition of VAT on fuel: it was Labour that

stopped the government from increasing VAT on fuel to 17.5 per cent.

Taxation is not neutral in the way it raises revenue. How and what

governments tax sends clear signals about the economic activities they

believe should be encouraged or discouraged, and the values they wish to

entrench in society. Just as, for example, work should be encouraged

through the tax system, environmental pollution should be discouraged.

New Labour will establish a new trust on tax with the British people.

The promises we make we will keep. The principles that will underpin our

tax policy are clear: to encourage employment opportunities and work

incentives for all to promote savings and investment and to be fair and

be seen to be fair. New Labour is not about high taxes on ordinary

families. It is about social justice and a fair deal. New Labour

therefore makes the following economic pledges.





Fair taxes There will be no return to the penal tax rates that existed

under both Labour and Conservative governments in the 1970s. To

encourage work and reward effort, we are pledged not to raise the basic

or top rates of income tax throughout the next Parliament. Our long-term

objective is a lower starting rate of income tax of ten pence in the

pound. Reducing the high marginal rates at the bottom end of the earning

scale � often 70 or 80 per cent � is not only fair but desirable to

encourage employment. This goal will benefit the many, not the few. It

is in sharp contrast to the Tory goal of abolishing capital gains and

inheritance tax, at least half the benefit of which will go to the

richest 5,000 families in the country. We will cut VAT on fuel to five

per cent, the lowest level allowed.



We renew our pledge not to extend VAT to food, children's clothes, books

and newspapers and public transport fares. We will also examine the

interaction of the tax and benefits systems so that they can be

streamlined and modernised, so as to fulfil our objectives of promoting

work incentives, reducing poverty and welfare dependency, and

strengthening community and family life.





No risks with inflation We will match the current target for low and

stable inflation of 2.5 per cent or less. We will reform the Bank of

England to ensure that decision-making on monetary policy is more

effective, open, accountable and free from short-term political

manipulation.





Strict rules for government borrowing We will enforce the �golden rule'

of public spending � over the economic cycle, we will only borrow to

invest and not to fund current expenditure. We will ensure that � over

the economic cycle � public debt as a proportion of national income is

at a stable and prudent level.





Stick to planned public spending allocations for the first two years of

office Our decisions have not been taken lightly. They are a recognition

of Conservative mismanagement of the public finances. For the next two

years Labour will work within the departmental ceilings for spending

already announced. We will resist unreasonable demands on the public

purse, including any unreasonable public sector pay demands.





Switch spending from economic failure to investment We will conduct a

central spending review and departmental reviews to assess how to use

resources better, while rooting out waste and inefficiency in public

spending. Labour priorities in public spending are different from Tory

priorities.





Tax reform to promote saving and investment We will introduce a new

individual savings account and extend the principle of TESSAs and PEPs

to promote long-term saving. We will review the corporate and capital

gains tax regimes to see how the tax system can promote greater

long-term investment.





Labour's welfare-to-work Budget We will introduce a Budget within two

months after the election to begin the task of equipping the British

economy and reforming the welfare state to get young people and the

long-term unemployed back to work. This welfare-to-work programme will

be funded by a windfall levy on the excess profits of the privatised

utilities, introduced in this Budget after we have consulted the

regulators.











We will help create successful and profitable businesses



- Backing business: skills, infrastructure, new markets - Gains for

consumers with tough competition law - New measures to help small

businesses - National minimum wage to tackle low pay - Boost local

economic growth with Regional Development Agencies - A strong and

effective voice in Europe





New Labour offers business a new deal for the future. We will leave

intact the main changes of the 1980s in industrial relations and

enterprise. We see healthy profits as an essential motor of a dynamic

market economy, and believe they depend on quality products, innovative

entrepreneurs and skilled employees. We will build a new partnership

with business to improve the competitiveness of British industry for the

21st century, leading to faster growth. Many of the fundamentals of the

British economy are still weak. Low pay and low skills go together:

insecurity is the consequence of economic instability; the absence of

quality jobs is a product of the weakness of our industrial base; we

suffer from both high unemployment and skills shortages. There is no

future for Britain as a low wage economy: we cannot compete on wages

with countries paying a tenth or a hundredth of British wages. We need

to win on higher quality, skill, innovation and reliability. With

Labour, British and inward investors will find this country an

attractive and profitable place to do business. New Labour believes in a

flexible labour market that serves employers and employees alike. But

flexibility alone is not enough. We need �flexibility plus': plus higher

skills and higher standards in our schools and colleges plus policies to

ensure economic stability plus partnership with business to raise

investment in infrastructure, science and research and to back small

firms plus new leadership from Britain to reform Europe, in place of the

current policy of drift and disengagement from our largest market plus

guaranteeing Britain's membership of the single market � indeed opening

up further markets inside and outside the EU � helping make Britain an

attractive place to do business plus minimum standards of fair

treatment, including a national minimum wage plus an imaginative

welfare-to-work programme to put the long-term unemployed back to work

and to cut social security costs.





A reformed and tougher competition law Competitiveness abroad must begin

with competition at home. Effective competition can bring value and

quality to consumers. As an early priority we will reform Britain's

competition law. We will adopt a tough �prohibitive' approach to deter

anti-competitive practices and abuses of market power. In the utility

industries we will promote competition wherever possible. Where

competition is not an effective discipline, for example in the water

industry which has a poor environmental record and has in most cases

been a tax-free zone, we will pursue tough, efficient regulation in the

interests of customers, and, in the case of water, in the interests of

the environment as well. We recognise the need for open and predictable

regulation which is fair both to consumers and to shareholders and at

the same time provides incentives for managers to innovate and improve

efficiency.





Reinvigorate the Private Finance Initiative Britain's infrastructure is

dangerously run down: parts of our road and rail network are seriously

neglected, and all too often our urban environment has been allowed to

deteriorate. Labour pioneered the idea of public/private partnerships.

It is Labour local authorities which have done most to create these

partnerships at local level. A Labour government will overcome the

problems that have plagued the PFI at a national level. We will set

priorities between projects, saving time and expense; we will seek a

realistic allocation of risk between the partners to a project; and we

will ensure that best practice is spread throughout government. We will

aim to simplify and speed up the planning process for major

infrastructure projects of vital national interest. We will ensure that

self-financing commercial organisations within the public sector � the

Post Office is a prime example � are given greater commercial freedom to

make the most of new opportunities.





Backing small business The number of small employers has declined by

half a million since 1990.  Support for small businesses will have a

major role in our plans for economic growth. We will cut unnecessary red

tape; provide for statutory interest on late payment of debts; improve

support for high-tech start-ups; improve the quality and relevance of

advice and training through a reformed Business Links network and the

University for Industry; and assist firms to enter overseas markets more

effectively.





Local economic growth Prosperity needs to be built from the bottom up.

We will establish one-stop regional development agencies to co-ordinate

regional economic development, help small business and encourage inward

investment. Many regions are already taking informal steps to this end

and they will be supported.





Strengthen our capability in science, technology and design The UK must

be positively committed to the global pursuit of new knowledge, with a

strong science base in our universities and centres of excellence

leading the world. The Dearing Committee represents a significant

opportunity to promote high-quality standards in science teaching and

research throughout UK higher education. We support a collaborative

approach between researchers and business, spreading the use of new

technology and good design, and exploiting our own inventions to boost

business in the UK.





Promoting new green technologies and businesses There is huge potential

to develop Britain's environmental technology industries to create jobs,

win exports and protect the environment. Effective environmental

management is an increasingly important component of modern business

practice. We support a major push to promote energy conservation �

particularly by the promotion of home energy efficiency schemes, linked

to our environment taskforce for the under-25s. We are committed to an

energy policy designed to promote cleaner, more efficient energy use and

production, including a new and strong drive to develop renewable energy

sources such as solar and wind energy, and combined heat and power. We

see no economic case for the building of any new nuclear power stations.





Key elements of the 1980s trade union reforms to stay There must be

minimum standards for the individual at work, including a minimum wage,

within a flexible labour market. We need a sensible balance in

industrial relations law � rights and duties go together. The key

elements of the trade union legislation of the 1980s will stay � on

ballots, picketing and industrial action. People should be free to join

or not to join a union. Where they do decide to join, and where a

majority of the relevant workforce vote in a ballot for the union to

represent them, the union should be recognised. This promotes stable and

orderly industrial relations.  There will be full consultation on the

most effective means of implementing this proposal.





Partnership at work The best companies recognise their employees as

partners in the enterprise. Employees whose conditions are good are more

committed to their companies and are more productive. Many unions and

employers are embracing partnership in place of conflict. Government

should welcome this. We are keen to encourage a variety of forms of

partnership and enterprise, spreading ownership and encouraging more

employees to become owners through Employee Share Ownership Plans and

co-operatives. We support too the Social Chapter of the EU, but will

deploy our influence in Europe to ensure that it develops so as to 

promote employability and competitiveness, not inflexibility.





A sensibly set national minimum wage There should be a statutory level

beneath which pay should not fall � with the minimum wage decided not on

the basis of a rigid formula but according to the economic circumstances

of the time and with the advice of an independent low pay commission,

whose membership will include representatives of employers, including

small business, and employees. Every modern industrial country has a

minimum wage, including the US and Japan. Britain used to have minimum

wages through the Wages Councils. Introduced sensibly, the minimum wage

will remove the worst excesses of low pay (and be of particular benefit

to women), while cutting some of the massive �4 billion benefits bill by

which the taxpayer subsidises companies that pay very low wages.













We will get the unemployed from welfare to work





- Stop the growth of an �underclass' in Britain - 250,000 young

unemployed off benefit and into work - Tax cuts for employers who create

new jobs for the long-term unemployed - Effective help for lone parents





T  here are over one million fewer jobs in Britain than in 1990. One in

five families has no one working. One million single mothers are trapped

on benefits. There is a wider gap between rich and poor than for

generations. We are determined not to continue down the road of a

permanent have-not class, unemployed and disaffected from society. Our

long-term objective is high and stable levels of employment. This is the

true meaning of a stakeholder economy � where everyone has a stake in

society and owes responsibilities to it. The best way to tackle poverty

is to help people into jobs � real jobs. The unemployed have a

responsibility to take up the opportunity of training places or work,

but these must be real opportunities. The government's workfare

proposals � with a success rate of one in ten � fail this test. Labour's

welfare-to-work programme will attack unemployment and break the spiral

of escalating spending on social security. A one-off windfall levy on

the excess profits of the privatised utilities will fund our ambitious

programme.





Every young person unemployed for more than six months in a job or

training We will give 250,000 under-25s opportunities for work,

education and training. Four options will be on offer, each involving

day-release education or training leading to a qualification:

private-sector job: employers will be offered a �60-a-week rebate for

six months work with a non-profit voluntary sector employer, paying a

weekly wage, equivalent to benefit plus a fixed sum for six months

full-time study for young people without qualifications on an approved

course a job with the environment taskforce, linked to Labour's

citizens' service programme. Rights and responsibilities must go hand in

hand, without a fifth option of life on full benefit.





Every 16 and 17 year-old on the road to a proper qualification by the

year 2000 Nearly a third of young people do not achieve an NVQ level two

qualification by age 19. All young people will be offered part-time or

full-time education after the age of 16. Any under-18 year-old in a job

will have the right to study on an approved course for qualifications at

college. We will replace the failed Youth Training scheme with our new

Target 2000 programme, offering young people high-quality education and

training.





Action on long-term unemployment New partnerships between government and

business, fully involving local authorities and the voluntary sector,

will attack long-term joblessness. We will encourage employers to take

on those who have suffered unemployment for more than two years with a

�75-a-week tax rebate paid for six months, financed by the windfall

levy. Our programme for the phased release of past receipts from council

house sales will provide new jobs in the construction industry.





Lone parents into work Today the main connection between unemployed lone

parents and the state is their benefits. Most lone parents want to work,

but are given no help to find it. New Labour has a positive policy. Once

the youngest child is in the second term of full-time school, lone

parents will be offered advice by a proactive Employment Service to

develop a package of job search, training and after-school care to help

them off benefit.





Customised, personalised services We favour initiatives with new

combinations of available benefits to suit individual circumstances. In

new and innovative �Employment Zones', personal job accounts will

combine money currently available for benefits and training, to offer

the unemployed new options � leading to work and independence. We will

co-ordinate benefits, employment and career services, and utilise new

technology to improve their quality and efficiency.





Fraud Just as we owe it to the taxpayer to crack down on tax avoidance,

so we must crack down on dishonesty in the benefit system. We will start

with a clampdown on Housing Benefit fraud, estimated to cost �2 billion

a year, and will maintain action against benefit fraud of all kinds.















We will save the NHS



- 100,000 people off waiting lists - End the Tory internal market - End

waiting for cancer surgery - Tough quality targets for hospitals -

Independent food standards agency - New public health drive - Raise

spending in real terms every year � and spend the money on patients not

bureaucracy



Labour created the NHS 50 years ago. It is under threat from the

Conservatives. We want to save and modernise the NHS. But if the

Conservatives are elected again there may well not be an NHS in five

years' time � neither national nor comprehensive. Labour commits itself

anew to the historic principle: that if you are ill or injured there

will be a national health service there to help; and access to it will

be based on need and need alone � not on your ability to pay, or on who

your GP happens to be or on where you live. In 1990 the Conservatives

imposed on the NHS a complex internal market of hospitals competing to

win contracts from health authorities and fundholding GPs. The result is

an NHS strangled by costly red tape, with every individual transaction

the subject of a separate invoice. After six years, bureaucracy swallows

an extra �1.5 billion per year; there are 20,000 more managers and

50,000 fewer nurses on the wards; and more than one million people are

on waiting lists.  The government has consistently failed to meet even

its own health targets. There can be no return to top-down management,

but Labour will end the Conservatives' internal market in healthcare.

The planning and provision of care are necessary and distinct functions,

and will remain so. But under the Tories, the administrative costs of

purchasing care have undermined provision and the market system has

distorted clinical priorities. Labour will cut costs by removing the

bureaucratic processes of the internal market. The savings achieved will

go on direct care for patients. As a start, the first �100 million saved

will treat an extra 100,000 patients. We will end waiting for cancer

surgery, thereby helping thousands of women waiting for breast cancer

treatment.





Primary care will play a lead role In recent years, GPs have gained

power on behalf of their patients in a changed relationship with

consultants, and we support this. But the development of GP fundholding

has also brought disadvantages. Decision-making has been fragmented.

Administrative costs have grown. And a two-tier service has resulted.

Labour will retain the lead role for primary care but remove the

disadvantages that have come from the present system. GPs and nurses

will take the lead in combining together locally to plan local health

services more efficiently for all the patients in their area. This will

enable all GPs in an area to bring their combined strength to bear upon

individual hospitals to secure higher standards of patient provision. In

making this change, we will build on the existing collaborative schemes

which already serve 14 million people. The current system of

year-on-year contracts is costly and unstable. We will introduce three-

to five-year agreements between the local primary care teams and

hospitals. Hospitals will then be better able to plan work at full

capacity and co-operate to enhance patient services.





Higher-quality services for patients Hospitals will retain their

autonomy over day-to-day administrative functions, but, as part of the

NHS, they will be required to meet high-quality standards in the

provision of care. Management will be held to account for performance

levels. Boards will become more representative of the  local communities

they serve. A new patients' charter will concentrate on the quality and

success of treatment. The Tories' so-called  �Efficiency Index' counts

the number of patient �episodes', not the quality or success of

treatment. With Labour, the measure will be quality of outcome, itself

an incentive for effectiveness. As part of our concern to ensure

quality, we will work towards the elimination of mixed-sex wards. Health

authorities will become the guardians of high standards. They will

monitor services, spread best practice and ensure rising standards of

care. The Tory attempt to use private money to build hospitals has

failed to deliver. Labour will overcome the problems that have plagued

the Private Finance Initiative, end the delays, sort out the confusion

and develop new forms of public/private partnership that work better and

protect the interests of the NHS. Labour is opposed to the privatisation

of clinical services which is being actively promoted by the

Conservatives. Labour will promote new developments in telemedicine �

bringing expert advice from regional centres of excellence to

neighbourhood level using new technology.





Good health A new minister for public health will attack the root causes

of ill health, and so improve lives and save the NHS money. Labour will

set new goals for improving the overall health of the nation which

recognise the impact that poverty, poor housing, unemployment and a

polluted environment have on health. Smoking is the greatest single

cause of preventable illness and premature death in the UK. We will

therefore ban tobacco advertising. Labour will establish an independent

food standards agency. The �3.5 billion BSE crisis and the E. coli

outbreak which resulted in serious loss of life, have made unanswerable

the case for the independent agency we have proposed.





NHS spending The Conservatives have wasted spending on the NHS. We will

do better. We will raise spending on the NHS in real terms every year

and put the money towards patient care. And a greater proportion of

every pound spent will go on patient care not bureaucracy.





An NHS for the future The NHS requires continuity as well as change, or

the system cannot cope. There must be pilots to ensure that change

works. And there must be flexibility, not rigid prescription, if

innovation is to flourish. Our fundamental purpose is simple but hugely

important: to restore the NHS as a public service working co-operatively

for patients, not a commercial business driven by competition.















We will be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime





- Fast-track punishment for persistent young offenders - Reform Crown

Prosecution Service to convict more criminals - Police on the beat not

pushing paper - Crackdown on petty crimes and neighbourhood disorder -

Fresh parliamentary vote to ban all handguns







Under the Conservatives, crime has doubled and many more criminals get

away with their crimes: the number of people convicted has fallen by a

third, with only one crime in 50 leading to a conviction. This is the

worst record of any government since the Second World War � and for

England and Wales the worst record of any major industrialised country.

Last year alone violent crime rose 11 per cent. We propose a new

approach to law and order: tough on crime and tough on the causes of

crime. We insist on individual responsibility for crime, and will attack

the causes of crime by our measures to relieve social deprivation. The

police have our strong support. They are in the front line of the fight

against crime and disorder. The Conservatives have broken their 1992

general election pledge to provide an extra 1,000 police officers. We

will relieve the police of unnecessary bureaucratic burdens to get more

officers back on the beat.





Youth crime Youth crime and disorder have risen sharply, but very few

young offenders end up in court, and when they do half are let off with

another warning. Young offenders account for seven million crimes a

year. Far too often young criminals offend again and again while waiting

months for a court hearing. We will halve the time it takes to get

persistent young offenders from arrest to sentencing; replace widespread

repeat cautions with a single final warning; bring together Youth

Offender Teams in every area; and streamline the system of youth courts

to make it far more effective. New parental responsibility orders will

make parents face up to their responsibility for their children's

misbehaviour.





Conviction and sentencing The job of the Crown Prosecution Service is to

prosecute criminals effectively. There is strong evidence that the CPS

is over-centralised, bureaucratic and inefficient, with cases too often

dropped, delayed, or downgraded to lesser offences. Labour will

decentralise the CPS, with local crown prosecutors co-operating more

effectively with local police forces. We will implement an effective

sentencing system for all the main offences to ensure greater

consistency and stricter punishment for serious repeat offenders. The

courts will have to spell out what each sentence really means in

practice. The Court of Appeal will have a duty to lay down sentencing

guidelines for all the main offences. The attorney general's power to

appeal unduly lenient sentences will be extended. The prison service now

faces serious financial problems. We will audit the resources available,

take proper ministerial responsibility for the service, and seek to

ensure that prison regimes are constructive and require inmates to face

up to their offending behaviour.





Disorder The Conservatives have forgotten the �order' part of �law and

order'. We will tackle the unacceptable level of anti-social behaviour

and crime on our streets. Our �zero tolerance' approach will ensure that

petty criminality among young offenders is seriously addressed.

Community safety orders will deal with threatening and disruptive

criminal neighbours. Labour has taken the lead in proposing action to

tackle the problems of stalking and domestic violence. Child protection

orders will deal with young children suffering neglect by parents

because they are left out on their own far too late at night. Britain is

a multiracial and multicultural society. All its members must have the

protection of the law. We will create a new offence of racial harassment

and a new crime of racially motivated violence to protect ethnic

minorities from intimidation.





Drugs The vicious circle of drugs and crime wrecks lives and threatens

communities. Labour will appoint an anti-drugs supremo to co-ordinate

our battle against drugs across all government departments. The �drug

czar' will be a symbol of our commitment to tackle the modern menace of

drugs in our communities. We will pilot the use of compulsory drug

testing and treatment orders for offenders to ensure that the link

between drug addiction and crime is broken. This will be paid for by

bringing remand delays down to the national targets. We will attack the

drug problem in prisons. In addition to random drug testing of all

prisoners we will aim for a voluntary testing unit in every prison for

prisoners ready to prove they are drug-free.





Victims Victims of crime are too often neglected by the criminal justice

system. We will ensure that victims are kept fully informed of the

progress of their case, and why charges may have been downgraded or

dropped. Greater protection will be provided for victims in rape and

serious sexual offence trials and for those subject to intimidation,

including witnesses.





Prevention We will place a new responsibility on local authorities to

develop statutory partnerships to help prevent crime. Local councils

will then be required to set targets for the reduction of crime and

disorder in their area.





Gun control In the wake of Dunblane and Hungerford, it is clear that

only the strictest firearms laws can provide maximum safety. The

Conservatives failed to offer the protection required. Labour led the

call for an outright ban on all handguns in general civilian use. There

will be legislation to allow individual MPs a free vote for a complete

ban on handguns. Labour is the party of law and order in Britain today.

















We will strengthen family life





- Help parents balance work and family - Security in housing and help

for homeowners - Tackle homelessness using receipts from council house

sales - Dignity and security in retirement - Protect the basic state

pension and promote secure second pensions





We will uphold family life as the most secure means of bringing up our

children. Families are the core of our society. They should teach right

from wrong. They should be the first defence against anti-social

behaviour. The breakdown of family life damages the fabric of our

society. Labour does not see families and the state as rival providers

for the needs of our citizens. Families should provide the day-to-day

support for children to be brought up in a stable and loving

environment. But families cannot flourish unless government plays its

distinctive role: in education; where necessary, in caring for the

young; in making adequate provision for illness and old age; in

supporting good parenting; and in protecting families from lawlessness

and abuse of power. Society, through government, must assist families to

achieve collectively what no family can achieve alone. Yet families in

Britain today are under strain as never before. The security once

offered by the health service has been undermined. Streets are not safe.

Housing insecurity grows. One in five non-pensioner families has no one

working; and British men work the longest hours in Europe. The clock

should not be turned back. As many women who want to work should be able

to do so. More equal relationships between men and women have

transformed our lives. Equally, our attitudes to race, sex and sexuality

have changed fundamentally. Our task is to combine change and social

stability.





Work and family Families without work are without independence. This is

why we give so much emphasis to our welfare-to-work policies. Labour's

national childcare strategy will plan provision to match the

requirements of the modern labour market and help parents, especially

women, to balance family and working life. There must be a sound balance

between support for family life and the protection of business from

undue burdens � a balance which some of the most successful businesses

already strike. The current government has shown itself wholly

insensitive to the need to help develop family-friendly working

practices. While recognising the need for flexibility in implementation

and for certain exemptions, we support the right of employees not to be

forced to work more than 48 hours a week; to an annual holiday

entitlement; and to limited unpaid parental leave. These measures will

provide a valuable underpinning to family life. The rights of part-time

workers have been clarified by recent court judgements which we welcome.

We will keep under continuous review all aspects of the tax and benefits

systems to ensure that they are supportive of families and children. We

are committed to retain universal Child Benefit where it is universal

today � from birth to age 16 � and to uprate it at least in line with

prices. We are reviewing educational finance and maintenance for those

older than 16 to ensure higher staying-on rates at school and college,

and that resources are used to support those in most need. This review

will continue in government on the guidelines we have already laid down.





Security in housing Most families want to own their own homes. We will

also support efficiently run social and private rented sectors offering

quality and choice. The Conservatives' failure on housing has been

twofold. The two thirds of families who own their homes have suffered a

massive increase in insecurity over the last decade, with record

mortgage arrears, record negative equity and record repossessions. And

the Conservatives' lack of a housing strategy has led to the virtual

abandonment of social housing, the growth of homelessness, and a failure

to address fully leaseholder reform. All these are the Tory legacy.

Labour's housing strategy will address the needs of homeowners and

tenants alike. We will reject the boom and bust policies which caused

the collapse of the housing market. We will work with mortgage providers

to encourage greater provision of more flexible mortgages to protect

families in a world of increased job insecurity. Mortgage buyers also

require stronger consumer protection, for example by extension of the

Financial Services Act, against the sale of disadvantageous mortgage

packages. The problems of gazumping have reappeared. Those who break

their bargains should be liable to pay the costs inflicted on others, in

particular legal and survey costs. We are consulting on the best way of

tackling the problems of gazumping in the interests of responsible home

buyers and sellers.





The rented housing sector We support a three-way partnership between the

public, private and housing association sectors to promote good social

housing. With Labour, capital receipts from the sale of council houses,

received but not spent by local councils, will be re-invested in

building new houses and rehabilitating old ones. This will be phased to

match the capacity of the building industry and to meet the requirements

of prudent economic management. We also support effective schemes to

deploy private finance to improve the public housing stock and to

introduce greater diversity and choice. Such schemes should only go

ahead with the support of the tenants concerned: we oppose the

government's threat to hand over council housing to private landlords

without the consent of tenants and with no guarantees on rents or

security of tenure. We value a revived private rented sector. We will

provide protection where most needed: for tenants in houses in multiple

occupation. There will be a proper system of licensing by local

authorities which will benefit tenants and responsible landlords alike.

We will introduce �commonhold', a new form of tenure enabling people

living in flats to own their homes individually and to own the whole

property collectively. We will simplify the current rules restricting

the purchase of freeholds by leaseholders.





Homelessness Homelessness has more than doubled under the Conservatives.

Today more than 40,000 families in England are in expensive temporary

accommodation. The government, in the face of Labour opposition, has

removed the duty on local authorities to find permanent housing for

homeless families. We will impose a new duty on local authorities to

protect those who are homeless through no fault of their own and are in

priority need. There is no more powerful symbol of Tory neglect in our

society today than young people without homes living rough on the

streets. Young people emerging from care without any family support are

particularly vulnerable. We will attack the problem in two principal

ways: the phased release of capital receipts from council house sales

will increase the stock of housing for rent; and our welfare-to-work

programme will lead the young unemployed into work and financial

independence.





Older citizens We value the positive contribution that older people make

to our society, through their families, voluntary activities and work.

Their skills and experience should be utilised within their communities.

That is why, for example, we support the proposal to involve older

people as volunteers to help children learn in pre-school and

after-school clubs. In work, they should not be discriminated against

because of their age. The provision of adequate pensions in old age is a

major challenge for the future. For today's pensioners Conservative

policies have created real poverty, growing inequality and widespread

insecurity. The Conservatives would abolish the state-financed basic

retirement pension and replace it with a privatised scheme, with a vague

promise of a means-tested state guarantee if pensions fall beneath a

minimum level. Their proposals mean there will be no savings on welfare

spending for half a century; and taxes will have to rise to make

provision for new privately funded pensions. Their plans require an

additional �312 billion between now and 2040 through increased taxes or

borrowing, against the hope of savings later, with no certainty of

security in retirement at the end. We believe that all pensioners should

share fairly in the increasing prosperity of the nation. Instead of

privatisation, we propose a partnership between public and private

provision, and a balance between income sourced from tax and invested

savings. The basic state pension will be retained as the foundation of

pension provision. It will be increased at least in line with prices. We

will examine means of delivering more automatic help to the poorest

pensioners � one million of whom do not even receive the Income Support

which is their present entitlement. We will encourage saving for

retirement, with proper protection for savings. We will reform the

Financial Services Act so that the scandal of pension mis-selling �

600,000 pensions mis-sold and only 7,000 people compensated to date �

will not happen again. Too many people in work, particularly those on

low and modest incomes and with changing patterns of employment, cannot

join good-value second pension schemes. Labour will create a new

framework � stakeholder pensions � to meet this need. We will encourage

new partnerships between financial service companies, employers and

employees to develop these pension schemes. They will be approved to

receive people's savings only if they meet high standards of value for

money, flexibility and security. Labour will promote choice in pension

provision. We will support and strengthen the framework for occupational

pensions. Personal pensions, appropriately regulated, will remain a good

option for many. Labour will retain SERPS as an option for those who

wish to remain within it. We will also seek to develop the

administrative structure of SERPS so as to create a �citizenship

pension' for those who assume responsibility as carers, as a result lose

out on the pension entitlements they would otherwise acquire, and

currently end up on means-tested benefits. We overcame government

opposition to pension splitting between women and men on divorce. We

will implement this in government. We aim to provide real security for

families through a modern system of community care. As people grow

older, their need for care increases. The Conservative approach is to

promote private insurance and privatisation of care homes. But private

insurance will be inaccessible to most people. And their policy for

residential homes is dogmatic and will not work. We believe that local

authorities should be free to develop a mix of public and private care.

We recognise the immense amount of care provision undertaken by family

members, neighbours and friends. It was a Labour MP who piloted the 1995

Carers Act through Parliament. We will establish a Royal Commission to

work out a fair system for funding long-term care for the elderly. We

will introduce a �long-term care charter' defining the standard of

services which people are entitled to expect from health, housing and

social services. We are committed to an independent inspection and

regulation service for residential homes, and domiciliary care. Everyone

is entitled to dignity in retirement. Under the Tories, the earnings

link for state pensions has been ended, VAT on fuel has been imposed,

SERPS has been undermined and community care is in tatters. We will set

up a review of the central areas of insecurity for elderly people: all

aspects of the basic pension and its value, second pensions including

SERPS, and community care. The review will ensure that the views of

pensioners are heard. Our watchword in developing policy for pensions

and long-term care will be to build consensus among all interested

parties.

















We will help you get more out of life







- Every government department a �green' department - Efficient and clean

transport for all - New arts and science talent fund for young people -

Reform the lottery - Improve life in rural areas - Back World Cup bid







The millennium is the time to reaffirm our responsibility to protect and

enhance our environment so that the country we hand on to our children

and our grandchildren is a better place in which to live. It also

provides a natural opportunity to celebrate and improve the contribution

made by the arts, culture and sport to our nation. We need a new and

dynamic approach to the �creative economy'. The Department of National

Heritage will develop a strategic vision that matches the real power and

energy of British arts, media and cultural industries.





Protecting the environment Our generation, and generations yet to come,

are dependent on the integrity of the environment. No one can escape

unhealthy water, polluted air or adverse climate change. And just as

these problems affect us all, so we must act together to tackle them. No

responsible government can afford to take risks with the future: the

cost is too high. So it is our duty to act now. The foundation of

Labour's environmental approach is that protection of the environment

cannot be the sole responsibility of any one department of state. All

departments must promote policies to sustain the environment. And

Parliament should have an environmental audit committee to ensure high

standards across government. Throughout this manifesto, there are

policies designed to combine environmental sustainability with economic

and social progress. They extend from commitments at local level to give

communities enhanced control over their environments, to initiatives at

international level to ensure that all countries are contributing to the

protection of the environment. A sustainable environment requires above

all an effective and integrated transport policy at national, regional

and local level that will provide genuine choice to meet people's

transport needs. That is what we will establish and develop.





Railways The process of rail privatisation is now largely complete. It

has made fortunes for a few, but has been a poor deal for the taxpayer.

It has fragmented the network and now threatens services. Our task will

be to improve the situation as we find it, not as we wish it to be. Our

overriding goal must be to win more passengers and freight on to rail.

The system must be run in the public interest with higher levels of

investment and effective enforcement of train operators' service

commitments. There must be convenient connections, through-ticketing and

accurate travel information for the benefit of all passengers. To

achieve these aims, we will establish more effective and accountable

regulation by the rail regulator; we will ensure that the public subsidy

serves the public interest; and we will establish a new rail authority,

combining functions currently carried out by the rail franchiser and the

Department of Transport, to provide a clear, coherent and strategic

programme for the development of the railways so that passenger

expectations are met. The Conservative plan for the wholesale

privatisation of London Underground is not the answer. It would be a

poor deal for the taxpayer and passenger alike. Yet again, public assets

would be sold off at an under-valued rate. Much-needed investment would

be delayed. The core public responsibilities of the Underground would be

threatened. Labour plans a new public/private partnership to improve the

Underground, safeguard its commitment to the public interest and

guarantee value for money to taxpayers and passengers.





Road transport A balanced transport system must cater for all the

familiar modes of transport: cars � whether owned, leased or shared;

taxis; buses; bicycles and motorcycles. All needs must be addressed in

transport planning to ensure the best mix of all types of transport,

offer quality public transport wherever possible and help to protect the

environment. The key to efficient bus services is proper regulation at

local level, with partnerships between local councils and bus operators

an essential component. There must be improved provision and enforcement

of bus lanes. Better parking facilities for cars must be linked to

convenient bus services to town centres. Road safety is a high priority.

Cycling and walking must be made safer, especially around schools. We

remain unpersuaded by the case for heavier, 44-tonne lorries mooted by

the Conservatives. Our concern is that they would prove dangerous and

damaging to the environment. Our plans to reduce pollution include

working with the automotive industry to develop �smart', efficient and

clean cars for the future, with substantially reduced emission levels.

The review of vehicle excise duty to promote low-emission vehicles will

be continued. We will conduct an overall strategic review of the roads

programme against the criteria of accessibility, safety, economy and

environmental impact, using public/private partnerships to improve road

maintenance and exploiting new technology to improve journey

information.





Shipping and aviation The Tory years have seen the near-extinction of

Britain's merchant fleet. Labour will work with all concerned in

shipping and ports to help develop their economic potential to the full.

The guiding objectives of our aviation strategy will be fair

competition, safety and environmental standards. We want all British

carriers to be able to compete fairly in the interests of consumers.





Life in our countryside Labour recognises the special needs of people

who live and work in rural areas. The Conservatives do not. Public

services and transport services in rural areas must not be allowed to

deteriorate. The Conservatives have tried to privatise the Post Office.

We opposed that, in favour of a public Post Office providing a

comprehensive service. Conservative plans would mean higher charges for

letters and put rural post offices under threat. We favour a moratorium

on large-scale sales of Forestry Commission land. We recognise that the

countryside is a great natural asset, a part of our heritage which calls

for careful stewardship. This must be balanced, however, with the needs

of people who live and work in rural areas. The total failure of the

Conservatives to manage the BSE crisis effectively and to secure any

raising of the ban on British beef has wreaked havoc on the beef and

dairy industries. The cost to the taxpayer so far is �3.5 billion.

Labour aims to reform the Common Agricultural Policy to save money, to

support the rural economy and enhance the environment. Our initiatives

to link all schools to the information superhighway will ensure that

children in rural areas have access to the best educational resources.

Our policies include greater freedom for people to explore our open

countryside. We will not, however, permit any abuse of a right to

greater access. We will ensure greater protection for wildlife. We have

advocated new measures to promote animal welfare, including a free vote

in Parliament on whether hunting with hounds should be banned by

legislation. Angling is Britain's most popular sport. Labour's anglers'

charter affirms our long-standing commitment to angling and to the

objective of protecting the aquatic environment.





Arts and culture The arts, culture and sport are central to the task of

recreating the sense of community, identity and civic pride that should

define our country. Yet we consistently undervalue the role of the arts

and culture in helping to create a civic society � from amateur theatre

to our art galleries. Art, sport and leisure are vital to our quality of

life and the renewal of our economy. They are significant earners for

Britain. They employ hundreds of thousands of people. They bring

millions of tourists to Britain every year, who will also be helped by

Labour's plans for new quality assurance in hotel accommodation. We

propose to set up a National Endowment for Science and the Arts to

sponsor young talent. NESTA will be a national trust � for talent rather

than buildings � for the 21st century. NESTA will be partly funded by

the lottery; and artists who have gained high rewards from their

excellence in the arts and wish to support young talent will be

encouraged to donate copyright and royalties to NESTA.





Sport A Labour government will take the lead in extending opportunities

for participation in sports; and in identifying sporting excellence and

supporting it. School sports must be the foundation. We will bring the

government's policy of forcing schools to sell off playing fields to an

end. We will provide full backing to the bid to host the 2006 football

World Cup in England. A Labour government will also work to bring the

Olympics and other major international sporting events to Britain.





A people's lottery The lottery has been a financial success. But there

has been no overall strategy for the allocation of monies; and no

co-ordination among the five distributor bodies about the projects

deserving to benefit from lottery funding. For example, the

multi-million-pound expenditure on the Churchill papers caused national

outrage. A Labour government will review the distribution of lottery

proceeds to ensure that there is the widest possible access to the

benefits of lottery revenues throughout the UK. Labour has already

proposed a new millennium commission to commence after the closure of

the Millennium Exhibition, to provide direct support for a range of

education, environment and public health projects, including those

directed at children's play, a project currently excluded from lottery

benefit. Because the lottery is a monopoly intended to serve the public

interest, it must be administered efficiently and economically. When the

current contract runs out, Labour will seek an efficient not-for-profit

operator to ensure that the maximum sums go to good causes.





Media and broadcasting Labour aims for a thriving, diverse media

industry, combining commercial success and public service. We will

ensure that the BBC continues to be a flagship for British creativity

and public service broadcasting, but we believe that the combination of

public and private sectors in competition is a key spur to innovation

and high standards. The regulatory framework for media and broadcasting

should reflect the realities of a far more open and competitive economy,

and enormous technological advance, for example with digital television.

Labour will balance sensible rules, fair regulation and national and

international competition, so maintaining quality and diversity for the

benefit of viewers.





Citizens' service for a new millennium An independent and creative

voluntary sector, committed to voluntary activity as an expression of

citizenship, is central to our vision of a stakeholder society. We are

committed to developing plans for a national citizens' service

programme, to tap the enthusiasm and commitment of the many young people

who want to make voluntary contributions in service of their

communities. The millennium should harness the imagination of all those

people who have so much to offer for the benefit of the community. We do

not believe programmes should be imposed from the top down, but on the

contrary wish to encourage a broad range of voluntary initiatives

devised and developed by people within their own communities.























We will clean up politics





- End the hereditary principle in the House of Lords - Reform of party

funding to end sleaze - Devolved power in Scotland and Wales - Elected

mayors for London and other cities - More independent but accountable

local government - Freedom of information and guaranteed human rights





The Conservatives seem opposed to the very idea of democracy. They

support hereditary peers, unaccountable quangos and secretive

government. They have debased democracy through their MPs who have taken

cash for asking questions in the House of Commons. They are opposed to

the development of decentralised government. The party which once

opposed universal suffrage and votes for women now says our constitution

is so perfect that it cannot be improved. Our system of government is

centralised, inefficient and bureaucratic. Our citizens cannot assert

their basic rights in our own courts. The Conservatives are afflicted by

sleaze and prosper from secret funds from foreign supporters. There is

unquestionably a national crisis of confidence in our political system,

to which Labour will respond in a measured and sensible way.





A modern House of Lords The House of Lords must be reformed. As an

initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the

future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of

Lords will be ended by statute. This will be the first stage in a

process of reform to make the House of Lords more democratic and

representative. The legislative powers of the House of Lords will remain

unaltered. The system of appointment of life peers to the House of Lords

will be reviewed. Our objective will be to ensure that over time party

appointees as life peers more accurately reflect the proportion of votes

cast at the previous general election. We are committed to maintaining

an independent cross-bench presence of life peers. No one political

party should seek a majority in the House of Lords. A committee of both

Houses of Parliament will be appointed to undertake a wide-ranging

review of possible further change and then to bring forward proposals

for reform. We have no plans to replace the monarchy.





An effective House of Commons We believe the House of Commons is in need

of modernisation and we will ask the House to establish a special Select

Committee to review its procedures. Prime Minister's Questions will be

made more effective. Ministerial accountability will be reviewed so as

to remove recent abuses. The process for scrutinising European

legislation will be overhauled. The Nolan recommendations will be fully

implemented and extended to all public bodies. We will oblige parties to

declare the source of all donations above a minimum figure: Labour does

this voluntarily and all parties should do so. Foreign funding will be

banned. We will ask the Nolan Committee to consider how the funding of

political parties should be regulated and reformed. We are committed to

a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An

independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to

recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

At this election, Labour is proud to be making major strides to rectify

the under-representation of women in public life.





Open government Unnecessary secrecy in government leads to arrogance in

government and defective policy decisions. The Scott Report on arms to

Iraq revealed Conservative abuses of power. We are pledged to a Freedom

of Information Act, leading to more open government, and an independent

National Statistical Service.





Devolution: strengthening the Union The United Kingdom is a partnership

enriched by distinct national identities and traditions. Scotland has

its own systems of education, law and local government. Wales has its

language and cultural traditions. We will meet the demand for

decentralisation of power to Scotland and Wales, once established in

referendums. Subsidiarity is as sound a principle in Britain as it is in

Europe. Our proposal is for devolution not federation. A sovereign

Westminster Parliament will devolve power to Scotland and Wales. The

Union will be strengthened and the threat of separatism removed. As soon

as possible after the election, we will enact legislation to allow the

people of Scotland and Wales to vote in separate referendums on our

proposals, which will be set out in white papers. These referendums will

take place not later than the autumn of 1997. A simple majority of those

voting in each referendum will be the majority required. Popular

endorsement will strengthen the legitimacy of our proposals and speed

their passage through Parliament. For Scotland we propose the creation

of a parliament with law-making powers, firmly based on the agreement

reached in the Scottish Constitutional Convention, including defined and

limited financial powers to vary revenue and elected by an additional

member system. In the Scottish referendum we will seek separate

endorsement of the proposal to create a parliament, and of the proposal

to give it defined and limited financial powers to vary revenue. The

Scottish parliament will extend democratic control over the

responsibilities currently exercised administratively by the Scottish

Office. The responsibilities of the UK Parliament will remain unchanged

over UK policy, for example economic, defence and foreign policy. The

Welsh assembly will provide democratic control of the existing Welsh

Office functions. It will have secondary legislative powers and will be

specifically empowered to reform and democratise the quango state. It

will be elected by an additional member system. Following majorities in

the referendums, we will introduce in the first year of the Parliament

legislation on the substantive devolution proposals outlined in our

white papers.





Good local government Local decision-making should be less constrained

by central government, and also more accountable to local people. We

will place on councils a new duty to promote the economic, social and

environmental well-being of their area. They should work in partnership

with local people, local business and local voluntary organisations.

They will have the powers necessary to develop these partnerships. To

ensure greater accountability, a proportion of councillors in each

locality will be elected annually. We will encourage democratic

innovations in local government, including pilots of the idea of elected

mayors with executive powers in cities. Although crude and universal

council tax capping should go, we will retain reserve powers to control

excessive council tax rises. Local business concerns are critical to

good local government. There are sound democratic reasons why, in

principle, the business rate should be set locally, not nationally. But

we will make no change to the present system for determining the

business rate without full consultation with business. The funnelling of

government grant to Conservative-controlled Westminster speaks volumes

about the unfairness of the current grant system. Labour is committed to

a fair distribution of government grant. The basic framework, not every

detail, of local service provision must be for central government.

Councils should not be forced to put their services out to tender, but

will be required to obtain best value. We reject the dogmatic view that

services must be privatised to be of high quality, but equally we see no

reason why a service should be delivered directly if other more

efficient means are available. Cost counts but so does quality. Every

council will be required to publish a local performance plan with

targets for service improvement, and be expected to achieve them. The

Audit Commission will be given additional powers to monitor performance

and promote efficiency. On its advice, government will where necessary

send in a management team with full powers to remedy failure. Labour

councils have been at the forefront of environmental initiatives under

Local Agenda 21, the international framework for local action arising

from the 1992 Earth Summit. A Labour government will encourage all local

authorities to adopt plans to protect and enhance their local

environment. Local government is at the sharp end of the fight against

deprivation. Ten years after the Conservatives promised to improve the

inner cities, poverty and social division afflict towns and outer

estates alike. A Labour government will join with local government in a

concerted attack against the multiple causes of social and economic

decline � unemployment, bad housing, crime, poor health and a degraded

environment.





London London is the only Western capital without an elected city

government. Following a referendum to confirm popular demand, there will

be a new deal for London, with a strategic authority and a mayor, each

directly elected. Both will speak up for the needs of the city and plan

its future. They will not duplicate the work of the boroughs, but take

responsibility for London-wide issues � economic regeneration, planning,

policing, transport and environmental protection. London-wide

responsibility for its own government is urgently required. We will make

it happen.





The regions of England The Conservatives have created a tier of regional

government in England through quangos and government regional offices.

Meanwhile local authorities have come together to create a more

co-ordinated regional voice. Labour will build on these developments

through the establishment of regional chambers to co-ordinate transport,

planning, economic development, bids for European funding and land use

planning. Demand for directly elected regional government so varies

across England that it would be wrong to impose a uniform system. In

time we will introduce legislation to allow the people, region by

region, to decide in a referendum whether they want directly elected

regional government. Only where clear popular consent is established

will arrangements be made for elected regional assemblies. This would

require a predominantly unitary system of local government, as presently

exists in Scotland and Wales, and confirmation by independent auditors

that no additional public expenditure overall would be involved. Our

plans will not mean adding a new tier of government to the existing

English system.





Real rights for citizens Citizens should have statutory rights to

enforce their human rights in the UK courts. We will by statute

incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law to bring

these rights home and allow our people access to them in their national

courts. The incorporation of the European Convention will establish a

floor, not a ceiling, for human rights. Parliament will remain free to

enhance these rights, for example by a Freedom of Information Act. We

will seek to end unjustifiable discrimination wherever it exists. For

example, we support comprehensive, enforceable civil rights for disabled

people against discrimination in society or at work, developed in

partnership with all interested parties. Labour will undertake a

wide-ranging review both of the reform of the civil justice system and

Legal Aid. We will achieve value for money for the taxpayer and the

consumer. A community legal service will develop local, regional and

national plans for the development of Legal Aid according to the needs

and priorities of regions and areas. The key to success will be to

promote a partnership between the voluntary sector, the legal profession

and the Legal Aid Board. Every country must have firm control over

immigration and Britain is no exception. All applications, however,

should be dealt with speedily and fairly. There are, rightly, criteria

for those who want to enter this country to join husband or wife. We

will ensure that these are properly enforced. We will, however, reform

the system in current use to remove the arbitrary and unfair results

that can follow from the existing �primary purpose' rule. There will be

a streamlined system of appeals for visitors denied a visa. The system

for dealing with asylum seekers is expensive and slow � there are many

undecided cases dating back beyond 1993. We will ensure swift and fair

decisions on whether someone can stay or go, control unscrupulous

immigration advisors and crack down on the fraudulent use of birth

certificates.





Northern Ireland Labour's approach to the peace process has been

bipartisan. We have supported the recent agreements between the two

governments � the Anglo-Irish Agreement, the Downing Street Declaration

and the Framework Document. The government has tabled proposals which

include a new devolved legislative body, as well as cross-border

co-operation and continued dialogue between the two governments. There

will be as great a priority attached to seeing that process through with

Labour as under the Conservatives, in co-operation with the Irish

government and the Northern Ireland parties. We will expect the same

bipartisan approach from a Conservative opposition. We will take

effective measures to combat the terrorist threat. There is now general

acceptance that the future of Northern Ireland must be determined by the

consent of the people as set out in the Downing Street Declaration.

Labour recognises that the option of a united Ireland does not command

the consent of the Unionist tradition, nor does the existing status of

Northern Ireland command the consent of the Nationalist tradition. We

are therefore committed to reconciliation between the two traditions and

to a new political settlement which can command the support of both.

Labour will help build trust and confidence among both Nationalist and

Unionist traditions in Northern Ireland by acting to guarantee human

rights, strengthen confidence in policing, combat discrimination at work

and reduce tensions over parades. Labour will also foster economic

progress and competitiveness in Northern Ireland, so as to reduce

unemployment.



















We will give Britain leadership in Europe





- Referendum on single currency - Lead reform of the EU - Retain

Trident: strong defence through NATO - A reformed United Nations -

Helping to tackle global poverty







Britain, though an island nation with limited natural resources, has for

centuries been a leader of nations. But under the Conservatives

Britain's influence has waned. With a new Labour government, Britain

will be strong in defence; resolute in standing up for its own

interests; an advocate of human rights and democracy the world over; a

reliable and powerful ally in the international institutions of which we

are a member; and will be a leader in Europe. Our vision of Europe is of

an alliance of independent nations choosing to co-operate to achieve the

goals they cannot achieve alone. We oppose a European federal

superstate. There are only three options for Britain in Europe. The

first is to come out. The second is to stay in, but on the sidelines.

The third is to stay in, but in a leading role. An increasing number of

Conservatives, overtly or covertly, favour the first. But withdrawal

would be disastrous for Britain. It would put millions of jobs at risk.

It would dry up inward investment. It would destroy our clout in

international trade negotiations. It would relegate Britain from the

premier division of nations. The second is exactly where we are today

under the Conservatives. The BSE fiasco symbolises their failures in

Europe. The third is the path a new Labour government will take. A fresh

start in Europe, with the credibility to achieve reform. We have set out

a detailed agenda for reform, leading from the front during the UK

presidency in the first half of 1998: Rapid completion of the single

market: a top priority for the British presidency. We will open up

markets to competition; pursue tough action against unfair state aids;

and ensure proper enforcement of single market rules. This will

strengthen Europe's competitiveness and open up new opportunities for

British firms. High priority for enlargement of the European Union to

include the countries of central and eastern Europe and Cyprus, and the

institutional reforms necessary to make an enlarged Europe work more

efficiently. Urgent reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. It is

costly, vulnerable to fraud and not geared to environmental protection.

Enlargement and the World Trade talks in 1999 will make reform even more

essential. We will seek a thorough overhaul of the Common Fisheries

Policy to conserve our fish stocks in the long-term interests of the UK

fishing industry. Greater openness and democracy in EU institutions with

open voting in the Council of Ministers and more effective scrutiny of

the Commission by the European Parliament. We have long supported a

proportional voting system for election to the European Parliament.

Retention of the national veto over key matters of national interest,

such as taxation, defence and security, immigration, decisions over the

budget and treaty changes, while considering the extension of Qualified

Majority Voting in limited areas where that is in Britain's interests.

Britain to sign the Social Chapter. An �empty chair' at the negotiating

table is disastrous for Britain. The Social Chapter is a framework under

which legislative measures can be agreed. Only two measures have been

agreed � consultation for employees of large Europe-wide companies and

entitlement to unpaid parental leave. Successful companies already work

closely with their workforces. The Social Chapter cannot be used to

force the harmonisation of social security or tax legislation and it

does not cost jobs. We will use our participation to promote

employability and flexibility, not high social costs.





The single currency Any decision about Britain joining the single

currency must be determined by a hard-headed assessment of Britain's

economic interests. Only Labour can be trusted to do this: the Tories

are riven by faction. But there are formidable obstacles in the way of

Britain being in the first wave of membership, if EMU takes place on 1

January 1999. What is essential for the success of EMU is genuine

convergence among the economies that take part, without any fudging of

the rules. However, to exclude British membership of EMU forever would

be to destroy any influence we have over a process which will affect us

whether we are in or out. We must therefore play a full part in the

debate to influence it in Britain's interests. In any event, there are

three pre-conditions which would have to be satisfied before Britain

could join during the next Parliament: first, the Cabinet would have to

agree; then Parliament; and finally the people would have to say �Yes'

in a referendum.





Strong defence through NATO The post-Cold War world faces a range of new

security challenges � proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the

growth of ethnic nationalism and extremism, international terrorism, and

crime and drug trafficking. A new Labour government will build a strong

defence against these threats. Our security will continue to be based on

NATO. Our armed forces are among the most effective in the world. The

country takes pride in their professionalism and courage. We will ensure

that they remain strong to defend Britain. But the security of Britain

is best served in a secure world, so we should be willing to contribute

to wider international peace and security both through the alliances to

which we belong, in particular NATO and the Western European Union, and

through other international organisations such as the UN and the

Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Labour will

conduct a strategic defence and security review to reassess our

essential security interests and defence needs. It will consider how the

roles, missions and capabilities of our armed forces should be adjusted

to meet the new strategic realities. The review we propose will be

foreign policy led, first assessing our likely overseas commitments and

interests and then establishing how our forces should be deployed to

meet them.





Arms control A new Labour government will retain Trident. We will press

for multilateral negotiations towards mutual, balanced and verifiable

reductions in nuclear weapons. When satisfied with verified progress

towards our goal of the global elimination of nuclear weapons, we will

ensure that British nuclear weapons are included in multilateral

negotiations. Labour will work for the effective implementation of the

Chemical Weapons Convention and for a strengthening of the Biological

Weapons Convention. Labour will ban the import, export, transfer and

manufacture of all forms of anti-personnel landmines. We will introduce

an immediate moratorium on their use. Labour will not permit the sale of

arms to regimes that might use them for internal repression or

international aggression. We will increase the transparency and

accountability of decisions on export licences for arms. And we will

support an EU code of conduct governing arms sales. We support a strong

UK defence industry, which is a strategic part of our industrial base as

well as our defence effort. We believe that part of its expertise can be

extended to civilian use through a defence diversification agency.





Leadership in the international community A new Labour government will

use Britain's permanent seat on the Security Council to press for

substantial reform of the United Nations, including an early resolution

of its funding crisis, and a more effective role in peacekeeping,

conflict prevention, the protection of human rights and safeguarding the

global environment. The Commonwealth provides Britain with a unique

network of contacts linked by history, language and legal systems.

Labour is committed to giving renewed priority to the Commonwealth in

our foreign relations. We will seize the opportunity to increase trade

and economic co-operation and will also build alliances with our

Commonwealth partners to promote reform at the UN and common action on

the global environment. Britain has a real opportunity to provide

leadership to the Commonwealth when we host the heads of government

meeting in Britain at the end of 1997.





Promoting economic and social development Labour will also attach much

higher priority to combating global poverty and underdevelopment.

According to the World Bank, there are 1.3 billion people in the world

who live in absolute poverty, subsisting on less than US$1 a day, while

35,000 children die each day from readily preventable diseases. Labour

believes that we have a clear moral responsibility to help combat global

poverty. In government we will strengthen and restructure the British

aid programme and bring development issues back into the mainstream of

government decision-making. A Cabinet minister will lead a new

department of international development. We will shift aid resources

towards programmes that help the poorest people in the poorest

countries. We reaffirm the UK's commitment to the 0.7 per cent UN aid

target and in government Labour will start to reverse the decline in UK

aid spending. We will work for greater consistency between the aid,

trade, agriculture and economic reform policies of the EU. We will use

our leadership position in the EU to maintain and enhance the position

of the poorest countries during the renegotiation of the Lom�

Convention. We will support further measures to reduce the debt burden

borne by the world's poorest countries and to ensure that developing

countries are given a fair deal in international trade. It is our aim to

rejoin UNESCO. We will consider how this can be done most effectively

and will ensure that the cost is met from savings elsewhere.





Human rights Labour wants Britain to be respected in the world for the

integrity with which it conducts its foreign relations. We will make the

protection and promotion of human rights a central part of our foreign

policy. We will work for the creation of a permanent international

criminal court to investigate genocide, war crimes and crimes against

humanity.





A new environmental internationalism Labour believes that the threats to

the global climate should push environmental concerns higher up the

international agenda. A Labour government will strengthen co-operation

in the European Union on environmental issues, including climate change

and ozone depletion. We will lead the fight against global warming,

through our target of a 20 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide

emissions by the year 2010. Labour believes the international

environment should be safeguarded in negotiations over international

trade. We will also work for the successful negotiation of a new

protocol on climate change to be completed in Japan in 1997.





Leadership, not isolation There is a sharp division between those who

believe the way to cope with global change is for nations to retreat

into isolationism and protectionism, and those who believe in

internationalism and engagement. Labour has traditionally been the party

of internationalism. Britain cannot be strong at home if it is weak

abroad. The tragedy of the Conservative years has been the squandering

of Britain's assets and the loss of Britain's influence. A new Labour

government will use those assets to the full to restore Britain's pride

and influence as a leading force for good in the world. With effective

leadership and clear vision, Britain could once again be at the centre

of international decision-making instead of at its margins.





















This manifesto contains the detail of our plans. We have promised only

what we know we can deliver.Britain deserves better and the following

five election   pledges will be the first steps towards a better

Britain. If you would like to help us build that better Britain, join us

by calling 0990 300 900.









cut class sizes to 30 or under for 5, 6 and 7 year-olds by using money

from the assisted places scheme



fast-track punishment for persistent young offenders by halving the time

from arrest to sentencing



cut NHS waiting lists by treating an extra 100,000 patients as a first

step by releasing �100 million saved from NHS red tape



get 250,000 under-25 year-olds off benefit and into work by using money

from a windfall levy on the privatised utilities



no rise in income tax rates, cut VAT on heating to 5 per cent and

inflation and interest rates as low as possible

    
38.54Dear JohnRIOT01::SUMMERFIELDSic Transit Gloria MundiFri May 02 1997 12:284
    John Major has just announced that he will be stepping down as leader
    of the Conservative Party.
    
    Balders
38.55IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 12:303
    My that is a surprise. I hope he packed all his things last night.
    
    Jamie.
38.56VAXCAT::GOLDYSmart goldfishFri May 02 1997 12:553
    Doesn't surprise me, except that he made the announcement so quickly.
    
    Goldy.
38.5745080::CWINPENNYFri May 02 1997 13:108
    
    I'm extremely happy with the result especially the downfall of the
    large number of 'safe' Tory seats and even more so at the downfall of
    Finchley.
    
    Not so much a landslide as a culling.
    
    Chris
38.58IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 13:296
    Unfortunately the various service providers drastically misjudged the
    interest that the election would cause on the web. As a result I cannot
    attach to the special web sites covering the election nor to the
    Electronic Telegraph for general news.

    Jamie.
38.59VAXCAT::LAURIEDesktop Consultant, Project EnterpriseFri May 02 1997 13:5221
    This is a very grim day indeed. Not so much because the Tories lost,
    because as I've said before, in many ways they not only deserved it,
    but needed it. It's a grim day because Labour now have a mandate and a
    majority to do whatever they like. It was noticable in the campaign
    that all the nutters kept very quiet, and no real meat whatsoever was
    put on the bones of Labour's promises.
    
    It's a grim day because Labour, notwithstanding the nutters crawling
    out of the woodwork and from under their rocks, will now cede all
    sovreignty to Brussels, sign us up to the Social Chapter, join a single
    currency, and generally destroy the only healthy economy in Europe. I
    don't even want to think what they'll do to education.
    
    At least Suffolk stayed blue.
    
    Yep, it's a grim day indeed.
    
    Looking on the positive side, I suppose my house in the Channel Islands
    is leaping in value by the minute, and after all, I am an ex-pat.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
38.6045862::DODDFri May 02 1997 14:0413
    Although all the results are not yet in...
    
    The labour party do not really have that much bigger a mandate than the
    tories had.
    
    In the 1992 election the tories polled 42% of the votes cast, so far
    labour are on about 44%. This is in part due to boundary changes and
    the quirks of the electoral system. I would also suggest that it shows
    a considerable amount of voting for the candidate most likely to remove
    the sitting tory - in other words tactical voting on a scale never seen
    before.
    
    Andrew
38.61IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 14:303
    Tactical voting = boot the buggers out?

    Jamie.
38.62black monday was a victory or what?MKTCRV::MANNERINGSFri May 02 1997 14:507
    >>>generally destroy the only healthy economy in Europe
    
    the what??
    
    Excuse me please while I hold my side and have a good giggle.
    
    ..Kevin.. 
38.63IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Fri May 02 1997 14:594
    Well some good news, the pound is beginning to drop, It is two  Dutch
    cents down on its value this morning.

    Jamie.
38.64EVTSG8::TOWERSFri May 02 1997 15:396
    What would be very amusing would be if Ken Clark won the Tory
    leadership and Labour stuck to its manifesto. Then we might end up with
    a Labour party to the right of the Tories!
    
    Cheers,
    Brian
38.65I've got a landslide, blowing through my headCHEFS::16.42.3.171::CONNELLAFri May 02 1997 16:0446
No big suprise there Jamie, city pundits had been saying for weeks that 
a new govt would lead to short term jitters by the city.

I am absolutely knackered having sat up till 3.30am to watch the demise 
in all it's glory and get up at 6.30 to witness the final acts..  I feel 
it's important to redress the despair I felt in 1992 and the tears shed 
whilst very drunk with two of my fellow students watching Neil Kinnocks 
speach.

I disagree with Laurie (no big surprise there) this is the sign that the 
British people are not as timid/dim  as I thought they were.  They can 
see that the Tory govt was not helping the "poorer" people (so what!!!) 
but neither were they doing a great deal for *them* either. I could not 
have predicted such a Labour landslide, I had faith we would win but was 
amazed and delighted in the way the country turned against tory and pro 
Labour, even the Tories who did not vote gave their consent to a labour 
Govt.  I am in awe of the support they have gained...

I know this may be difficult for some people, but this is the first time 
in 18 years I have been able to gloat politically- Portillo, Mellow, 
Shepphard, Fox etx...  THe best result of the night (well the funniest 
result) was the Martin Bell majority over Hamilton git!!!!!!!  HA HA 
HA!!

I am very very happy today, Labour have a long road ahead and a big 
mountain to climb.  They are not about to return to the ideology of late 
seventies, the govt must act in a way that can ensure this country stays 
economically sound but perhaps they can redress some of the problems 
created by Thatcherism and the Tory monopoly over the country.

I have never understood anyone but major employers being against the 
Social Chapter.... minimum wage, holiday pay, employment protection, 
employee rights, I would personally welcome that right.  Considering any 
Trade Union power has been given up by the Tories (and yes they did need 
to be controlled!!) I would welcome legislative rights to protect my 
interest in the work place (especially as I am about to be "outsourced = 
sold off) and am reliant on the European TUPEE law).   No entry into the 
single currency without a referendum, so put your money where your mouth 
is.. and vote!!

Happy girl, my mum rang me a 3 am having had 3 gin and tonics and sang 
D-ream down the phone to me.. not bad for a 63 year old!!   Give the new 
govt a chance.  I think it's a really exciting time and it means that 
Paul Daniels is going to leave Britain!!!

Andrea
38.66try a cup of teaMKTCRV::MANNERINGSFri May 02 1997 16:3622
    Andrea,
    
    I can remember Harold Wilson getting elected in 1964, 'after 13 years of
    tory misrule.' I was delighted, and indeed I am delighted today.
    The Open University was a big achievement, and Barbara
    Castle got some good anti-discrimination legislation on the statute
    book, but I was horrified at the way Wilson sat on his hands while
    Biafra starved during the Nigerian Civil War, to protect the interests
    of British Oil companies. They also supported the USA in Vietnam when
    opposition would have made a difference.  Then in 69 NI became the
    issue and Labour supported shoot to kill and RUC terror. 
    
    I hope your optimism does not suffer in the same way.
    
    BTW Will Labour do anything for London ? Ken Livingstone did a good job
    on the GLC, for all his opportunist warts.
    
    Re the unions, there was a problem with Stalinism in the unions, but
    the Tories are the bosses party at the end of the day, and employee
    rights are important.
    
    ..Kevin..  
38.6745080::CWINPENNYFri May 02 1997 17:5219
    
    Re: .59
    
    Come on Laurie, the Tories had sod all policies apart from let's wait
    and see. They spent the whole campaign preaching about how bad the
    other parties were, which the Liberals didn't do and the odd Labour
    candidate may have done but it certainly didn;t appear to be offical
    policy, add that to the 'wait and see' above. They aimed their rhetoric
    at their own loyal true blue supporters akin to a budgie with a new
    mirror, I know that whilst wanting a Tory Government you want a
    different one to what was on offer so that doesn't apply to you.
    
    They deserved what they got and nothing less.
    
    And to whoever it was that said major businesses didn't want the social
    chapter, theat's not quite true. Major businesses are not as
    apprehensive about the social chapter as the small sweat shops.
    
    Chris
38.68IJSAPL::ANDERSONNow noting in colour!"Mon May 05 1997 07:209
    You know somewhere at the back of my mind I can remember the Labour
    government making such a cock up of the economy that they had to go cap
    in hand to the International Monetary Fund to get bailed out like they
    were a banana republic. That was about the same time that you could
    spend a whole fifty quit a head on holidays abroad every year.

    I shall watch "New Labour" with interest.
    
    Jamie.
38.69COMICS::SUMNERCOpenVMS Counter IntelligenceTue May 06 1997 10:0714
    Although I think the nation needs a new government and I hope Labour do
    a good job, I can't help but be surprised in labours attitude to
    Student Grants.
    
    Can anyone explain labours policy of getting rid of Student grants and
    forcing the poor beggars to take out full loans ?  I'm sure there's
    more to this policy but I only saw a small article in the Sun.  If
    single mums get housing benefit I can't see a reason why students
    should be penalized.
    
    I'm not a student anymore, but I believe they are an important part of
    the nations future.
    
    Chris      
38.70Starting to hurt already45862::lzodhcp-182-48-148.lzo.dec.com::hiltong[email protected]Tue May 06 1997 14:554
1st working day, Labour puts up interest rates 1/4%, The Halifax 
follows suit by announcing mortages go up, others to follow.


38.71OSEC::GRAHAMGraham Smith, Solution Support GroupTue May 06 1997 15:066
    The Halifax has put rates up by .35% - .10 percentage points more than
    the rise.
    
    Hands up who voted to float.
    
    Graham
38.72TUXEDO::GASKELLTue May 06 1997 15:239
    The 1964 election of Labor eventually broke my fathers solid Labor
    heart.  Wilson promised to soak it to the rich and help the poor.  
    The voters forgot to ask him to clarify his cut on who was rich.  
    (I think owning a fountain pen put you into the "rich" bracket.) 
    
    Although, I have a greater hope that this Labor government will be
    better than Wilson's.  Blair strikes me as being a much better class
    of politician all together.  If I'm right, who knows, I may even come 
    back to the UK to retire?