Title: | Alpha Support Conference |
Notice: | This is a new Alphanotes, please read note 2.2 |
Moderator: | VAXAXP::BERNARDO |
Created: | Thu Jan 02 1997 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 128 |
Total number of notes: | 617 |
Someone from Xerox (looking into a port of an HP-UX printing application to Digital UNIX) asked me a few hardware questions that I don't know the answers to myself. Thanks in advance if you can help. Here they are: > 4) Hardware > > EnterPrint requires a dedicated SCSI bus for connection to the Xerox > printer and to the shared disks. > > Q: Do all hardware platforms support additional SCSI controllers? > > Q: Can the initiator IDs of the additional SCSI controllers be set > to 6? (6 is the ID reserved for the print host by the Xerox DDI > protocol). > > Q: For each supported platform, can each SCSI controller be identified > by a physical slot ID? E-mail answers are prefered. -mark.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
37.1 | Usually, Yes, Yes | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:42 | 23 |
> Q: Do all hardware platforms support additional SCSI controllers? All? No. Those with the available I/O bus slots and power, yes. > Q: Can the initiator IDs of the additional SCSI controllers be set > to 6? (6 is the ID reserved for the print host by the Xerox DDI > protocol). The SCSI controller ID can be altered -- that the controller SCSI ID can be reset is a basic requirement for multi-host SCSI support. (Be aware that we generally ship SCSI controllers set to 6, but that multi-host SCSI configurations will have hosts at other SCSI IDs.) > Q: For each supported platform, can each SCSI controller be identified > by a physical slot ID? Under OpenVMS, yes -- the controller letters are different for each controller installed, so yes, one can identify the controller. And each device on the SCSI maps directly to a particular SCSI ID. (Given the requirements for diagnostics, I'd be surprised if UNIX did not provide an analogous way to track problems and errors, etc, back to a particular controller.) |