T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
556.1 | | BSS::JILSON | WFH in the Chemung River Valley | Fri May 02 1997 09:40 | 4 |
| If the customer is running Pathworks then you need to look at the STARS
article [OpenVMS,PW-VMS] PATHWORKS V5.0 Periodically Consumes Nonpaged Pool
Jilly
|
556.2 | no pathworks | AXCL04::LAGIOIA | We do ...the best | Fri May 02 1997 09:51 | 9 |
| Hello!
Thanks for your quick answer but they do not have pathworks.
Any other idea?
Tanks
Cheers
|
556.3 | IPMT | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Fri May 02 1997 11:16 | 12 |
|
There are cases where the self-tuning pool support does cause problems,
due to the local application loading.
There exists the potential for changes in this area and (if memory
serves) there are changes being made, but you will want to pursue this
through formal channels (such as an IPMT), as someone from engineering
will likely need to characterize the application load and look at the
self-tuning data to determine what has happened here.
The IPMT would likely be relatively low priority, as you appear to have
a workaround.
|
556.4 | | BSS::JILSON | WFH in the Chemung River Valley | Fri May 02 1997 11:31 | 33 |
| Nonpaged Dynamic Memory (Lists + Variable)
->Current Size (bytes) 14080000 Current Total Size (pages) 27500
Initial Size (NPAGEDYN) 3520000 Initial Size (pages) 6875
->Maximum Size (NPAGEVIR) 14080000 Maximum Size (pages) 27500
-> Free Space (bytes) 268032 Space in Use (bytes) 13811968
Size of Largest Block 5184 Size of Smallest Block 64
Number of Free Blocks 1024 Free Blocks LEQU 64 Bytes 634
Free Blocks on Lookasides 66 Lookaside Space (bytes) 26752
Since the pool is in use you will need to take a look at who/what is using
the pool. There are pool leaks in a few different pieces of software. If
the customer is running DECNET/OSI then make sure they have the latest
version with the latest patches. To see where the pool is being consumed
you need to look at the packets for the largest % consumer
$ ANA/SYSTEM
READ/EXEC
READ SYS$SYSTEM:SYSDEF
SHOW POOL/SUMMARY/NONPAGE
Once you see what packet type is the largest consumer then you can do a
SHOW POOL/HEAD/TYPE=blah/NONPAGE
This will show you the address of the packet, the size of the packet (in
decimal) and the 1st 4 longwords in the packet (in hex and in ASCII). If
you can't determine anything from the longwords then you'll need to dump
some of the packets with an EXAM address;^Dsize
The US CSC has some internal tools that can be used to trace who/what is
allocating pool and not releasing it. Normally this type of work is a
billable service to customers unless it is Digital software casusing the
pool expansion.
Jilly
|
556.5 | | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | Rod OpenVMS Engineering. Project Rock | Fri May 02 1997 12:15 | 8 |
| RE: .1,.2.,3
note that .0 says that this is a *Known* problem, and the question is
whether there is a fix to this known problem.
RE: 0.
What is the reference (STARs for preference) which makes you state that
this is known ? It might be worthwhile asking for an update to the
IMPT case...
|
556.6 | IPMT | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Fri May 02 1997 12:42 | 11 |
| re. 5
: note that .0 says that this is a *Known* problem, and the question is
: whether there is a fix to this known problem.
Folks are aware of workloads where the self-tuning mechanism causes
problems, and are aware of specific workloads that can cause this.
Assuming this is not the Pathworks "storm" problem, and is actually
a problem with the memory management self-tuning, the IPMT will get
the request into the queue, and will get this particular workload
looked at to see if this is a new/different failure in the self-tuning.
|
556.7 | there isn't much left to manage | EVMS::GRANT | | Fri May 02 1997 14:04 | 3 |
| But .4 points out the real problem in this situation. The variable list
is short and there isn't much on the lookaside lists. Nearly all of
pool is currently allocated. Step 1 is to find out who has it.
|
556.8 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue May 27 1997 20:15 | 10 |
| |the pool. There are pool leaks in a few different pieces of software. If
|the customer is running DECNET/OSI then make sure they have the latest
|version with the latest patches. To see where the pool is being consumed
|you need to look at the packets for the largest % consumer
fwiw, DECnet/OSI v6.3 ECO6 is the latest and has the memory leak. ECO7
is being worked on.
regards,
Mike
|