[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vaxaxp::vmsnotes

Title:VAX and Alpha VMS
Notice:This is a new VMSnotes, please read note 2.1
Moderator:VAXAXP::BERNARDO
Created:Wed Jan 22 1997
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:703
Total number of notes:3722

407.0. "CTRL-O looses dir info during SAB" by TAV02::CHAIM (Semper ubi Sub ubi .....) Wed Apr 02 1997 02:27

OpenVMS V6.2

A customer has described the following behaviour:

He booted standalone backup and issued backup/image/log. At that point he
starts getting the full file specification for each file being processed. At
some point he issued CTRL-O on the console and the CTRL-O again to resume the
display. From this point on he claims that he no longer received the full file
specification, but ONLY [] with the directory information normally contained
within the [] missing.

We both tried this with full VMS running and were unable to reproduce this. 

Unfortunatley, I do not currently have a system on which to try this.

Obviously this has no affect on the actual content of the backup saveset, but
the customer would like to understand what he has experienced.

Thanks,

Cb.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
407.1AUSS::GARSONDECcharity Program OfficeWed Apr 02 1997 03:288
    re .0
    
    Of course backup/image, standalone or otherwise, can save files that
    are not in a directory and which are indeed logged as []NAME.TYPE;N
    so I would start by doing a BACK/LIS on the backup to confirm that you
    are *not* experiencing this situation.
    
    VAX or Alpha?
407.2ANALYZE the source-input disk structure...XDELTA::HOFFMANSteve, OpenVMS EngineeringWed Apr 02 1997 10:388
.1:    Of course backup/image, standalone or otherwise, can save files that
.1:    are not in a directory and which are indeed logged as []NAME.TYPE;N
.1:    so I would start by doing a BACK/LIS on the backup to confirm that you
.1:    are *not* experiencing this situation.

   Also consider ANALYZE/DISK [/REPAIR] on the BACKUP source-input disk, and
   see how many files find their way into [SYSLOST]....

407.3Alias problem?SWETSC::WESTERBACKPanta reiThu Apr 03 1997 04:5824
    File specs  starting with [] are standard when a listing an image
    backup of a system disk which has the infamous (and common) alias 
    file problem, which is shown if you do 
    
    $ sh dev/files sys$sysdevice
    
    it should give output like this
    ....
    00000000  [VMS$COMMON.SYS$LDR]SYS.EXE;2
    00000000  [VMS$COMMON.SYS$LDR]EXEC_INIT.EXE;2
    ....
    
    If you have the  error it says something else, I think it was
    ....
    00000000  [SYSCOMMON....   instead of VMS$COMMON 
    
    Solution found in Release notes and many notes in here.
    
    Rgds,
    Hans
    
    
    
    
407.4BACKUP/[NO]ALIASXDELTA::HOFFMANSteve, OpenVMS EngineeringThu Apr 03 1997 10:3714
   I'm not sure the alias back-link problem is related to this.
   
   The alias backlink problem referenced in .3 was a result of
   having one of the alternate backlinks listed as "primary":
   [VMS$COMMON.SYS$LDR] and [SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYS$LDR] are the
   same directory file, after all.

   There *is* a way to reduce the total size of a BACKUP that
   involves ignoring the contents of the alternate backlinks.
   This reduces the size of the BACKUPs of disks with backlinks,
   but it also means that any /SELECT file-oriented restorations
   will operate only if the primary path (link) is specified.
   See BACKUP/[NO]ALIAS.