T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
357.1 | | ZIMBRA::BERNARDO | Dave Bernardo, VMS Engineering | Thu Mar 20 1997 12:57 | 4 |
|
use MAIL/OLD ....
d.
|
357.2 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu Mar 20 1997 13:35 | 6 |
| Can you elaborate on this? I looked in the V7.0 release notes and
didn't see any mention of a behavior change in Mail or about the
"/OLD" qualifier. Is all this related to the /PAGE qualifier now
in mail?
-John
|
357.3 | Try MAIL/OLD or SPAWN/OUTPUT=far.out/INPUT=NL: @foo.com | EVMS::DAVIDB::DMILLER | This bug fix broke what??????? | Thu Mar 20 1997 14:35 | 12 |
| Mail was re-written in C for V7.0. /PAGE behavior was added to be
consistent with other utilities that use /PAGE.
Because of the possibility of small behavioral changes that might
not be seen, the original mail utility remains on the kit and can
be invoked via MAIL/OLD.
You might try "SPAWN/OUTPUT=far.out/INPUT=NL: @foo.com". This may
get MAIL to realize you're not on a terminal, and not prompt for
the page breaks.
-Dave
|
357.4 | Thanks for quick answer | TLE::MCCLURE | | Thu Mar 20 1997 15:00 | 23 |
|
Thank you for the suggestions:
I tried SPAWN/OUTPUT=far.out/INPUT=NL: @foo.com
and the behavior is the same. In fact if I change
foo.com to be
set ter/page=0
mail
dir
exit
or
set ter/page=10
mail
dir
exit
or
set ter/page=100
mail
dir
exit
it always prompts for input after listing 4 lines.
Mail/old works. But will this continue to be supported ?
|
357.5 | Looks Like Buglet in New Mail | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Mar 20 1997 15:11 | 3 |
|
This four-line stuff sounds like it might be a bug -- something that
should be looked at (fixed?) in MAIL. You might want to QAR it...
|
357.6 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu Mar 20 1997 15:36 | 7 |
| RE: .3
> Mail was re-written in C for V7.0.
I'm afraid to ask why...
-John
|
357.7 | Simple... | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Mar 20 1997 16:12 | 7 |
|
: > Mail was re-written in C for V7.0.
: I'm afraid to ask why...
Because it was getting very difficult to maintain. (Or was that
a snide comment about C? :-)
|
357.8 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu Mar 20 1997 17:16 | 9 |
| No, there are enough snide comments about C/C++ to go around. You
don't need anymore from me.
As a mail user, I've always thought that it was pretty solid. My
opinion is that other OpenVMS components could have benefitted from
a rewrite (or at least a major upgrade) before MAIL. However, I
certainly don't know the dirty details behind the scenes...
-John (a proud owner of a C++ Barf Bag)
|
357.9 | | AUSS::GARSON | DECcharity Program Office | Thu Mar 20 1997 17:42 | 14 |
| re .0
Did you try SUBMIT?
re .*
Was callable MAIL included in that rewrite or just the front end?
Regarding MAIL solidity, my POP server repeatedly leaks to death and
occasionally exhibits other errors both of which the POP people attribute
to callable MAIL so a full rewrite that improves reliability is welcome
here.
C may be marginally better than Macro (32).
|
357.10 | | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | Rod OpenVMS Engineering. Project Rock | Fri Mar 21 1997 04:41 | 4 |
| Another reason to use mail/old is that in V7 at least it does not
extract /FOREIGN mail messages correctly.
.rod
|
357.11 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Mar 21 1997 09:15 | 3 |
| Really? How so? I haven't had a problem yet.
Steve
|
357.12 | | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | Rod OpenVMS Engineering. Project Rock | Fri Mar 21 1997 09:55 | 3 |
| I get bit mostly with OFFICE files (.DOC or .XLS).
See EVMS-GRYPHON QAR 1404. Problem *is* fixed in Gryphon.
|
357.13 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Mar 21 1997 12:37 | 4 |
| Oh, ok. I'm running Gryphon (7.1). I had received many .DOC files this
way without problems.
Steve
|
357.14 | Just the front end | EVMS::DAVIDB::DMILLER | This bug fix broke what??????? | Fri Mar 21 1997 16:20 | 10 |
| > Was callable MAIL included in that rewrite or just the front end?
Just the front end. The old front end used callable MAIL in
some places, and went off on it's own in others. I think the
new front end uses callable MAIL wherever possible, if not
completely.
Maintainabilitty of the old code was definitely a problem.
-Dave
|