T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
313.1 | Wrong Conference, Retired Product... | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Wed Mar 12 1997 11:17 | 12 |
|
The Assets ZAP product is being discussed over in the European Assets
notes conference -- from what I can tell, the entire Assets program
is currently undergoing a reorganization. See CLARID::EOASSETS.
ZAP was retired a while back. Also see the ZAP notes conference at
SHARE::ZAP. (If you're not sure about the location or the name of a
notes conference, "search humane::sys$public:easynotes.lis zap"...)
There are third-party idle-process killers available from a variety
of sources, and freeware available from DECUS and other sources.
|
313.2 | There are also 3rd party products | STAR::DEMERS | Leo 381-2245 OpenVMS/SEVMS SecurityPM | Wed Mar 12 1997 11:34 | 14 |
| Roberto,
If you cannot get an answer regarding ZAP please keep in mind
that some of our partners sell products that will solve this
problem on OpenVMS for your customer.
Two products that I can think of off the top of my head are
Axent's KBLOCK and Braintree's VIGIL. I think OpenVISION has
a product that does something similar as well.
- Leo Demers
OpenVMS & SEVMS
Security Product Manager
Tel: (603)881-2245
DTN:381-2245
|
313.3 | | AUSS::GARSON | DECcharity Program Office | Wed Mar 12 1997 17:04 | 19 |
| re .0
>He would like to kill user processes logged but inactive during the
>night, and for this requirement doesn't help setting hours, days or
>minutes in specific accounts (this blocks only possible new logins).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
False.
If you are logged in and the hour rolls over and you would not now be
allowed to log in, you will be killed by VMS with the following message.
%SYSTEM-F-FORCEDEXIT, forced exit of image or process by job controller
However this makes no distinction as to whether the process was idle
and so may not meet the customer's stated requirements.
As always when the topic of IPKs comes up, the question arises as to
why they feel they need to do this.
|
313.4 | Thanks! | MLNCSC::BORGINI | | Thu Mar 13 1997 03:42 | 6 |
| Hi to all,
many thanks for your quick suggestions.
Best regards,
Roberto.
|
313.5 | one possiblity | STAR::ABIS | I come in peace | Thu Mar 13 1997 10:28 | 15 |
| > <<< Note 313.3 by AUSS::GARSON "DECcharity Program Office" >>>
>
> As always when the topic of IPKs comes up, the question arises as to
> why they feel they need to do this.
I'm only guessing, but one reason could be due to license restrictions. Unlike
our internal systems, many customers are not licensed for unlimited use.
Therefore, inactive/idle logins can prevent people with real work from logging
in.
Perhaps if we had to work under the same conditions, there would be hooks in
the operating system to make things easier (and less kludgy) for tools like
ZAP.
Eric
|
313.6 | Yah, KBlock's good. some info about it. | STAR::EVERHART | | Fri Mar 14 1997 14:25 | 19 |
| ahem...
having worked on KBlock a bit, I'll mention that the XAutolock program
might also be considered for idle workstations. KBlock is otherwise
rather unaware of X connections. One can, with recent Digital X
servers, do rather better since they implement the xidle extension
but with older Digital X code, XAutolock needs to get in the input
chain. It does run on VMS however, and is reliable.
For terminals, I like WATCHER (free, from DECUS, sigtapes, or net)
and have used it. However, the ability to lock a terminal via a
terminal port/class intercept and block terminal traffic with no
other effect is unique to KBlock. The others can suspend processes,
stop them, forcex, or in a few cases detach them. Last I heard
of, KBlock was only on Vax, but may have been ported by now.
(One obstacle when I worked with it was that a good chunk of the
code was in Vax BASIC. I think they were translating it all to C
though.)
glenn everhart
|
313.7 | More info on Kblock & Vigil | STAR::DEMERS | Leo 381-2245 OpenVMS/SEVMS SecurityPM | Mon Mar 17 1997 17:11 | 13 |
| Here's some pointers to the products I mentioend earlier.
Kblock runs on Vax and Alpha there are More details at:
http://www.axent.com/product/classic/kblock1.htm
Looks like they are using XautoLock (but from a 3rd party?)
Also Braintree's Vigil product info is available at:
http://www.braintree.co.uk/BT_VIGIL.HTM
- Leo
|