[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference cookie::archive_backup

Title:Archive/Backup
Moderator:COOKIE::MHUAIG
Created:Wed Sep 08 1993
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:479
Total number of notes:2283

425.0. "Objects/Disks per SAVE request." by MARVEL::DAVIDC (Don't lose your head.) Mon Apr 14 1997 03:43

    
    Hello,
    
    A customer of mine has had some PAB queries which I have been helping
    him with. One question that I have not been able to answer is why the
    number of disks is limited to 8 in a SAVE request. He has 24 disks that
    he needs to back up and they need to be done together. Is there a
    workaround for this at all?
    
    He is running V2.0 of PAB
    
    Thanks in advance  
    
    Chris D.
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
425.1referenceCOOKIE::MHUAMon Apr 14 1997 13:365
    
    See note entry 361.4.
    
    
    Masami
425.2MARVEL::DAVIDCDon't lose your head.Tue Apr 15 1997 11:0111
    
    Masami...
    
    Thanks for your pointer - just the thing.
    
    
    Regards
    
    Chris D.
    
    
425.3Official Statement?MARVEL::DAVIDCDon't lose your head.Wed Apr 23 1997 10:0234
    
    Back again!!
    
    I advised the customer re: note 361.4 and he created a save request
    with 8 include objects using CREATE SAVE THDV69 FULL COM.
    
    He then used the PAB GUI to add another 10 objects to the save request.
    (The reason for this is that one of their systems has 18 disks).
    
    He started the save request. The 1st 17 objects backed up normally, but
    it failed on the 18th.
    
    (I have a full log file if anyone is interested)
    
    I advised the customer that this is probally due to a resource
    limitation, however he now is after a statement from DEC as to what is 
    the maximum number of objects per save request supported by PAB. 
    
    I advised him that if he wanted an official answer, then the answer is
    8.
    
    He was okay with this but now wants to know if their is some sort of
    work around to get the equivalent of two save requests to work together
    or be "piggy-backed" in some way. I said that I didn't think there was.
    
    Any replies, thoughts or solutions on the above would be greatly
    appreciated.
    
    
    Thanks in advance.
    
    Chris D.
    
    
425.4COOKIE::MHUAThu Apr 24 1997 12:5321
    
    Please point to the log file.  We have never seen ABS thread fails with
    resource problem before.  Or, may be the operation failed due to some
    other reason, it may have nothing to do with resource constraint. 
    Please post the show/full output of storage class, execution
    environment and save request also.

    Could you tell us why this customer needs to put 18 objects in one request?
    For manageability reason, putting large number of objects like 18 is not
    a good thing to do.  ABS keeps track of "overall" result of save which
    is the maximum severity of all 18 objects.  So, if you have 17
    successful object saved, but the 18th one failed with fatal error for
    some reason, the entire save request is flagged as "fatal error".

    If you want to keep the tape drive busy, you do not have to put all
    objects in one request. ABS manages tapes/drives in a way that making
    separate requests can keep the drive constantly busy.

    Masami


425.5Log file location.MARVEL::DAVIDCDon't lose your head.Fri Apr 25 1997 04:1617
    
    Masami, 
    
    Thanks for your reply again. The log files can be found in 
    
    		COMICS::DISK$DUMPS_B:[000000.DAVIDC_76413]
    
    As for why he wants 18 data objects in one save request, I'm not sure,
    but I think it has something to do with the way that the customer
    tracks his backups, rather than to keep the tape drive streaming.
    
    
    Many thanks
    
    Chris D.
    
    
425.6official number is inCOOKIE::MHUAFri Apr 25 1997 22:5735
    
    "Official limit of number of data object per ABS request"

    I discussed this topic within the engineering. The answer is we will
    officially support up to 8.  We did not document this clearly until
    now, but it will go into the next round of documentation. 

    The reason is that DCL limits to 8, and even if GUI can handle more
    objects, if there are more than 8 objects, the request cannot be
    handled from DCL interface.  We'd like to have ABS policy objects
    supported equally both from DCL and GUI. 

    	***************************

    If there is no strong reason rather than they want to execute the
    24 (or 18) requests "together", we'll strongly urge this customer
    to break apart their save requests into smaller requests.  By using
    the same storage class and execution environments, all data objects
    will be saved under same condition (using same drive, same volume
    set if you prefer).  

    Take 24 disks they have into some smaller logical groupings (or
    groupings in the order they want to backup). If you make 4 groups,
    there will be 6 objects each in a request. Schedule the request
    start time a little before the last save request is expected to
    end.  The next request will wait for resource (drive which is occupied
    by the previous request, and volume set being used) and as soon as
    the resources become available (when the previous request finished),
    the backup operation will start.

    24 disks can still be saved together in the same volume set with
    this layout, and you will also find it much more manageable to have
    smaller number of objects in one request.

	Masami
425.7MARVEL::DAVIDCDon't lose your head.Tue Apr 29 1997 05:4010
    
    Masami...
    
    Many thanks once again, I'll relay this to the customer.
    
    Much appreciated,
    
    Chris D.