[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference siog::year2000

Title:Year 2000
Moderator:SIOG::SYSTEM
Created:Mon Dec 09 1996
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:23
Total number of notes:70

9.0. "PCs" by SEPPLT::FREAK (Roy Freak) Mon Jan 20 1997 00:01

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
9.1PC Compliance infoSIOG::FARRELLYThu Jan 30 1997 15:20111
    
    The following is info I received from our territory PCBU:
    
    
    
    
    DIGITAL UK & IRELAND PC BUSINESS UNIT MARKETING UPDATE
    
    12 November 1996 / 256 BLITZ
    
    MILLENNIUM DATE ROLLOVER
    
    There has been much discussion over the likely problems that the
    computer industry will face with the date rollover at midnight on 31st
    December  1999.
    
    The majority of problems will arise when no action has been taken to 
    enhance applications software that  holds the date in YYMMDD format
    i.e. does  not hold the year as 1999 but as merely 99.
    
    A minor issue will also be incurred when the real time clock 
    controlled by the PC's BIOS incorrectly handles the rollover -
    resulting in the operating system typically showing a date in 1980
    rather than 1st January 2000.
    
    Digital has performed extensive testing of its desktop and mobile
    products to verify that the real time clock functions correctly on the
    millennium date rollover.  A further update will also be issued
    covering the Prioris  server range.
    
    DESKTOP SYSTEMS
    
     System			Part Number					
    Compliant
    			
     Celebris 486		FR-82xxx					
    Failed*
     Celebris 5xxx		FR-83xxx / FR-84xxx				
    Yes 
     Celebris FX 5xxx	FR-BAxxx					Yes
     Celebris GL 5xxx	FR-95xxx / FR-96xxx				Yes
     Celebris GL 6xxx	FR-B0xxx/ FR-B1xxx				Yes
     Celebris XL 5xxx	FR-87xxx / FR-98xxxFR-A0xxx / FR-A1xxx	Yes 
     Celebris XL 6xxx	FR-A3xxx					Yes 
    
     DECpc XL		FR-77xxx / FR-78xxx				Yes 
     DECpc LPv		FR-75xxx					Yes 
     DECpc LPv+		FR-74xxx					Yes 
     DECpc LPx		FR-76xxx					Yes 
     DECpc LPx+		FR-80xxx					Yes
     DECpc LPx 5xx		FR-81xxx					
    Yes
     DECpc MT		FR-PCT6x					Yes
     DECpc MTE		FR-PCT7x					Yes
    
     Venturis 486		FR-85xxx / FR-86xxx				
    Yes
     Venturis 5xxx		FR-92xxx					
    Yes 
     Venturis FX 5xxx	FR-A7xxx / FR-A8xxxFR-Aaxxx / FR-Abxxx	Yes
     Venturis GL 6xxx	FR-B0xxx / FR-B1xxx				Yes
    
    * Possible corrective action being evaluated
    
    NOTE: in each of the above cases, tests were carried out using the most
    recent version of the BIOS.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    MOBILE SYSTEMS
    
    As of January 1997, all HiNote Mobile Systems will be year 2000 
    compliant.
    
    Following is specific information relating to compliance on the HiNote 
    Ultra II, HiNote VP, and HiNote VP 500 products. The original HiNote & 
    HiNote Ultra (486 processor variants) are the only products that are
    currently not complaint.  A new BIOS will be released February 1997 on
    the BBS &  WWW.
    
    Product: Digital HiNote Ultra II			 Compliant for
    Windows 95 
    For WFW 3.11 BIOS upgrade to 2.09 or later may be required, if not 
    user must set date at system level (i.e. command prompt) and reboot.
    
    Product: Digital HiNote VP			 Compliant for Windows 95
    and WFW3.11
    
    Product: Digital HiNote VP 500			 Compliant for
    Windows 95 and WFW3.11
    			 
    Product: Digital HiNote Ultra (9.5-inch)		Compliant for
    Windows 95 
    For WFW 3.11BIOS upgrade will be necessary (due for release by 
    1/2/97), if not user must set date at system level (i.e. command
    prompt) and reboot
    
    Product: Digital HiNote (9.5-inch)			 Compliant for
    Windows 95 
    For WFW 3.11BIOS upgrade will be necessary (due for release by 
    1/2/97), if not user must set date at system level (i.e. command
    prompt) and reboot
    
    
    
    
9.2Location of BIOS Updates???CHEFS::LEYTONRichardMon Mar 03 1997 17:278
    From the preceding reply I deduce that an LPx should be compliant with
    the most recent BIOS.  Mine is not with the current (delivery) BIOS,
    what is the source of updates please?  (Some while ago I searched the
    Web and could not find an update, but I could well have not found the
    correct location.)
    
    Richard
    
9.3NT? Or am I reading to far into that Blitz?XDELTA::HOFFMANSteve, OpenVMS EngineeringMon Mar 03 1997 21:513
:    The following is info I received from our territory PCBU:

   NT is conspicuously absent in the testing...  Just W95 and WFW...