| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 3962.1 | It works for my customer. Cum grano salis | VIRGIN::DEMETRIOU | | Wed May 14 1997 05:45 | 8 |
| I think is fine as I have a customer using it. I must say
that up to the version 2.0.2 was an error, especially with
a mixed environment (Phase V and IV nodes).I escalated the
problem and engineering corrected it. I am not sure though
if V 2.0.3 has this correction but I would think so.
regards
Phyl
|
| 3962.2 | Worked for me... | DAVIDF::FOX | David B. Fox -- DTN 285-2091 | Wed May 14 1997 11:24 | 19 |
| I answered this in the COMMON_BROUTERS notes conference. It would have
been good to say that you had cross-posted this into multiple
conferences.
To paraphrase, it worked for me with Phase V clusters when I was
testing METEOR up to FCS. I haven't played with any of the subsequent
FIX kits that have been released.
I don't know what Phyl's problem was though. The RouteAbout will only
support Phase V cluster aliases. Phase IV clusters require a sepearate
alias and at least one member of the cluster must have a full function
license with routing enabled.
If the concern was about Phase IV ES to Phase V cluster, the RouteAbout
should handle the initial conversion of HELLO packets without any
difficulty. After that, the cluster will talk Phase IV to the ES
directly.
David
|
| 3962.3 | Bug fix is on the way... | DAVIDF::FOX | David B. Fox -- DTN 285-2091 | Wed May 14 1997 12:55 | 7 |
| Actually I do sort of remember Phyl's problem as Neil had asked me
about it.
The METEOR/ASTEROID Testing Project Leader just told me that the bug is
fixed in an upcoming fix kit. Stay tuned...
David
|